The game is GoGoD 2003-01-20o, between Otake Hideo, 9 dan (W), and Oya Koichi, 9 dan.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm37 Drive towards thickness? Mistake.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . 4 , O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . e a . . |
$$ | . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . c b . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X . d . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Elf reckons that
loses 12½% to the approach at
a, making it a definite mistake.
9 dans do not blindly follow proverbs, OC, but surely the one about driving the opponent's stones towards thickness was in the back of Oya's mind. And he was surely aware of the threat of
to slide to
b or otherwise take advantage of the weakness of Blacks' corner by playing at
c or
d, for instance. It is likely that he planned to reply to
with
before he decided on
. Unfortunately, Elf regards
as losing 9% by comparison with the kosumi at
c, which threatens the shoulder hit at
e.
Otake's play does not escape criticism, either.
, a two space extension that makes a base, and
, a one space jump, are bread and butter plays, but they are minor errors, or at least questionable. Elf reckons that
loses 5% to par and
loses 6%. IMO the bots are going to lead to a profound reconsideration of what we think we know about go, something that by human progress alone would have taken centuries to accomplish.
Let's take another look at
, through Elf's eyes.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm40 Variation for
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 6 . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . X 5 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O 3 7 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O O . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
switches to the bottom left, threatening to cut off three Black stones.
replies strongly by crawling into the White corner.
bolsters the White group with sente.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm48 Variation for , continued
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O X . . . . . . . . . 3 5 . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . 4 O 1 . |
$$ | . . O O . . O . . . . . . . . . 2 X . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
returns to the right side and blocks on the 2d line, making some territory. By comparison with
, White in this line of play on the right side makes territory and counters the influence of the Black wall.
Next, Elf's mainline variation for
is instructive.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm38 Threaten the corner first
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O 6 . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4 . |
$$ | . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . O O . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X 2 . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . 8 X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
plays kikashi against the corner before making a base with
. (If Black plays at
40 instead of blocking the corner, White can push into the corner at
39.)
undercuts the White base, but
simply blocks on top.
switches to the bottom left.
Top choice: Approach from the bottom
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm37 Extend from the wall
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . a W . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . 3 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
extends from the bottom corner. The fact that it might be close to the Black wall is no big deal. In fact, Black is building a territorial moyo.
switches to the bottom left, and plays into the center, as well. Takagawa points out that it is by no means necessary to make a base or extend from a side wedge like
, even though the ability to do so is part of the rationale for the play. Takagawa argues that preventing Black's ideal extension to
or
a is good enough. OTOH, the bots don't think much of those extensions early in the game.
Anyway, in the mainline variation White tenukis and later
plays an enclosure cum 3 space pincer against
.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm42 Mainline, continued
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O . . . 4 8 . . . . . . 6 . X . . |
$$ | . . . X X . 2 3 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . X O 5 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . O X X X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O O . O O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . O . . . . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
The hane,
, is a strong play dividing Black in two on the left side and attacking both ways.
bolsters his stones in the bottom left with sente. Then
extends Black's territorial moyo into the center, as anticipated by Knotwilg, pwaldron, and, I suppose, John Fairbairn.
White now continues the attack on the left side.
I would have chosen the approach of
in this game until I ran across a Jowa game years ago where Black played an side extension from a wall that seemed to me to be too close and thus a bit inefficient, and then played a one space jump from it, making territory from thickness.
I decided that maybe Jowa was right and I wasn't.
I think that the bots like the way top players in the 19th century handled play on the side over the way that top players in the 20th century did. This is another example, it seems to me.