(;CA[Windows-1252]AB[qd][oc][sr][pr][dn][oq][cq][dq][fp][pq][kp][lc][qk]AW[qq][sq]
[dk][dp][eo][fo][pp][po][qo][so][rm][rn][sm][dd][cp][jd][qr][rr][qi]LB[ok:A][nk:B]
[pi:C][qg:D][qj:E]C[djllap vs opex

Move 41 deliberation


]AP[MultiGo:4.4.4]
SZ[19]AB[gp]MULTIGOGM[1]

(;B[ok];W[qf]LB[rk:A]C[I don't care much for this result.  Black is not left with much.   Whit can connect under at "A" and B has no good follow ups.  ])
(;B[qg]
(;W[oi];B[ok]C[This is better for B, but White miht not play along.])
(;W[pk]
(;B[qj];W[pj];B[ri];W[qh];B[rh];W[pg];B[ph];W[pi];B[oh]LB[rg:A][qf:B]C[This looks good to me.  According to my reading, the cut at A is manageable.  The atari at B is also OK]
(;W[rg];B[qf];W[rf];B[re])
(;W[qf];B[rg]
(;W[pf];B[re])
(;W[rf];B[pf];W[og];B[ng];W[of];B[pe];W[nh];B[oi];W[nf];B[mg];W[ni];B[oj];W[ok]
;B[nj]))
(;W[og]
(;B[nh]
(;W[rg];B[qf])
(;W[qf];B[rg];W[rf];B[re];W[sf];B[pf]C[THis could lead into dicey watters for B.]))
(;B[qf];W[nh]C[This is bad for B.])))
(;B[pl]
(;W[ql];B[pj];W[ok];B[qj]C[Not Bad.])
(;W[ol]
(;B[pj];W[ok];B[qj]C[a decent result for both players.])
(;B[ok];W[pj];B[om];W[nl];B[nm];W[pm];B[ml];W[nk];B[mk];W[nj];B[mm]C[Not bad for B, though W gets quite a bit of profit.]))
(;W[pj];B[ql];W[ol];B[om];W[nm];B[nl];W[ok];B[nn];W[pm];B[mm]C[I like this result quite a bit.])))
(;W[pj];B[pk];W[ok];B[ol]
(;W[pl];B[pm];W[ql];B[nk];W[oj];B[nm]C[Again, I would be pleased with this.])
(;W[nk]
(;B[pm];W[nm];B[nl];W[ml];B[nn];W[mn];B[on];W[no]C[bad \:(])
(;B[nl];W[pl])
(;B[qj];W[pi];B[om];W[mm];B[nn];W[mn];B[no];W[mo];B[np];W[mp];B[mq]))))
(;B[pi];W[ph]
(;B[pj];W[qg]C[Hard to say, but I dont think I like it.])
(;B[oh]
(;W[pj];B[oi];W[qj];B[pg];W[qh];B[nk]C[Could be worse.])
(;W[pg];B[pj])
(;W[og]
(;B[qh];W[pg];B[qj];W[ri];B[rh];W[oi];B[pj];W[nh]C[Bad I think])
(;B[pg];W[qh];B[ng];W[oi];B[of];W[pj];B[ni]))))
(;B[qj];W[pi];B[ok];W[qf])
(;B[nk];W[qf]))