No, we don't. See my remark about "anybody" on the ground floor. Colloquial English is not logical. "Any" and "all" can get mixed up, as can "and" and "or". (I have noted that sometimes this confuses native German speakers, BTW.)

In context, the AGA rule statement is clear enough. But from a logical standpoint it uses "any" where it should use "all".

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

This is the approach of the Japanese 1989 rules.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

I think any is the correct word here and the quoted sentence means exactly what it's supposed to mean. It makes no assumption about the presence of captured enemy stones, it simply allows for the possibility, and I wouldn't even call it a colloquialism.