It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 2:57 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #1 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:04 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
Also: Do Go players go mad?

I've been doing some research and can't find anything on the subject. I'd like to compare Go to Chess in the psychology of the game and the pathology of the players. Does anyone have any information on the subject?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #2 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:15 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 349
Location: Washington State
Liked others: 272
Was liked: 60
Rank: OGS 11kyu
KGS: gotony
OGS: nghtstalker
Lol! What an interesting subject. Yes there have been some very unusual Chess masters. Quite colorful really. I do not know about GO masters nearly as well.

I do believe the current Chess masters are more balanced, they love Chess, work at it devotedly, but they have other interests as well. They surely aren't the dedicated smokers they used to be. But they are not quite as colorful either.

_________________
Walla Walla GO Club -(on FB)

We play because we enjoy the beauty of the game, the snap and feel of real stones, and meeting interesting people. Hope to see ya there! お願いします!

Anthony

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #3 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:45 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2221
Location: Germany
Liked others: 8268
Was liked: 924
Rank: OGS 9k
OGS: trohde
Universal go server handle: trohde
Heh, I don’t know where you draw the line to “mad”, but I can personally attest that it’s perfectly possible to be a Go player and at the same time to be a neurotic :twisted: and to have depressions :-|

For me, Go is also a means of coping, as — I think — is anything that is challenging and enjoyable at the same time.

_________________
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali ★ Play a slooooow correspondence game with me on OGS? :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #4 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:21 pm 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 93
Liked others: 87
Was liked: 11
Rank: EGF mid sdk
goTony wrote:
They surely aren't the dedicated smokers they used to be. But they are not quite as colorful either.


Generally speaking they never were.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #5 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:44 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
goTony wrote:
Lol! What an interesting subject. Yes there have been some very unusual Chess masters. Quite colorful really. I do not know about GO masters nearly as well.

I do believe the current Chess masters are more balanced, they love Chess, work at it devotedly, but they have other interests as well. They surely aren't the dedicated smokers they used to be. But they are not quite as colorful either.


Bonobo wrote:
Heh, I don’t know where you draw the line to “mad”, but I can personally attest that it’s perfectly possible to be a Go player and at the same time to be a neurotic :twisted: and to have depressions :-|

For me, Go is also a means of coping, as — I think — is anything that is challenging and enjoyable at the same time.


My thoughts involve computation vs creativity. Chess mimics computer thought processes whereas Go mimics the human thought. There's a quote: “Poets do not go mad; but chess-players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.” - G.K. Chesterton


This post by leonprimrose was liked by: goTony
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #6 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:31 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
leonprimrose wrote:
My thoughts involve computation vs creativity. Chess mimics computer thought processes whereas Go mimics the human thought. There's a quote: “Poets do not go mad; but chess-players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.” - G.K. Chesterton


Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity: "The Slyvia Plath Effect"

In the end, actually measuring any of this is extremely difficult. Was Edgar Allen Poe insane, or did he gather that reputation because of his subject matter? Was Emily Dickens reclusion insanity or just shyness? Are quantum physicists crazy, or does it just seem like it because the Paul Diracs make for better stories than the Neils Bohrs? How can you examine any of this in a double blind, clinical manner?

I suspect any real difference between insanity among Go and Chess players is going to be swamped by differences in cultural norms towards the topic in Eastern and Western society.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #7 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:47 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
Polama wrote:

Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity: "The Slyvia Plath Effect"

In the end, actually measuring any of this is extremely difficult. Was Edgar Allen Poe insane, or did he gather that reputation because of his subject matter? Was Emily Dickens reclusion insanity or just shyness? Are quantum physicists crazy, or does it just seem like it because the Paul Diracs make for better stories than the Neils Bohrs? How can you examine any of this in a double blind, clinical manner?

I suspect any real difference between insanity among Go and Chess players is going to be swamped by differences in cultural norms towards the topic in Eastern and Western society.


That's very fair. Just wish I could find more information on the psychology of the game and its players lol

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #8 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:57 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 349
Location: Washington State
Liked others: 272
Was liked: 60
Rank: OGS 11kyu
KGS: gotony
OGS: nghtstalker
leonprimrose wrote:
Polama wrote:

Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity: "The Slyvia Plath Effect"

In the end, actually measuring any of this is extremely difficult. Was Edgar Allen Poe insane, or did he gather that reputation because of his subject matter? Was Emily Dickens reclusion insanity or just shyness? Are quantum physicists crazy, or does it just seem like it because the Paul Diracs make for better stories than the Neils Bohrs? How can you examine any of this in a double blind, clinical manner?

I suspect any real difference between insanity among Go and Chess players is going to be swamped by differences in cultural norms towards the topic in Eastern and Western society.


That's very fair. Just wish I could find more information on the psychology of the game and its players lol


I strongly recommend "Chess Secrets I Learned from the Masters" by Edward Lasker yes one of the founders of the AGA. This book is reminisces of his games and the many Masters he played and learned from. A thoroughly enjoyable book. Many of the Chess Masters are from the 30's and 40's were quite unique. While it is not a documentary on madness it does a great job of revealing personalities. One does not have to play thru the games included to enjoy the book. And I daresay it is such a unique book that it may be of interest to people who do not like Chess. Mr Lasker generally writes with a certain respect and fondness for his opponents. He also mentions some Chess tournament shenanigans. A great place to start. Also he talks of his encounter with GO in the book but I do not wish to reveal any spoilers.

Some of the books about Fischer and the cold war taking place can be quite interesting.



Enjoy!

_________________
Walla Walla GO Club -(on FB)

We play because we enjoy the beauty of the game, the snap and feel of real stones, and meeting interesting people. Hope to see ya there! お願いします!

Anthony

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #9 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:14 pm 
Beginner
User avatar

Posts: 5
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 4
Rank: weakling
leonprimrose wrote:

My thoughts involve computation vs creativity. Chess mimics computer thought processes whereas Go mimics the human thought.


Here we go again. All hail Go, the most wonderful, creative and worthy game. Who plays chess anyway? It's really quite shallow and bleak.

I've heard people compare chess to painting, poetry and dance.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #10 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:28 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
japanesechessfan wrote:

Here we go again. All hail Go, the most wonderful, creative and worthy game. Who plays chess anyway? It's really quite shallow and bleak.

I've heard people compare chess to painting, poetry and dance.

Not even a little. I enjoy Chess. I actually just watched Searching for Bobby Fischer and then read into Fischer as a person and came across chess masters apparently going crazy. So I searched for Go in the same way and haven't been able to find anything on the pathology of Go masters. This is a purely intellectual question. Is "going mad" a thing prevalent in Go as it seems to be in Chess and why? I never once said one was better than the other.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #11 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:30 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
goTony wrote:
leonprimrose wrote:
Polama wrote:

Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity: "The Slyvia Plath Effect"

In the end, actually measuring any of this is extremely difficult. Was Edgar Allen Poe insane, or did he gather that reputation because of his subject matter? Was Emily Dickens reclusion insanity or just shyness? Are quantum physicists crazy, or does it just seem like it because the Paul Diracs make for better stories than the Neils Bohrs? How can you examine any of this in a double blind, clinical manner?

I suspect any real difference between insanity among Go and Chess players is going to be swamped by differences in cultural norms towards the topic in Eastern and Western society.


That's very fair. Just wish I could find more information on the psychology of the game and its players lol


I strongly recommend "Chess Secrets I Learned from the Masters" by Edward Lasker yes one of the founders of the AGA. This book is reminisces of his games and the many Masters he played and learned from. A thoroughly enjoyable book. Many of the Chess Masters are from the 30's and 40's were quite unique. While it is not a documentary on madness it does a great job of revealing personalities. One does not have to play thru the games included to enjoy the book. And I daresay it is such a unique book that it may be of interest to people who do not like Chess. Mr Lasker generally writes with a certain respect and fondness for his opponents. He also mentions some Chess tournament shenanigans. A great place to start. Also he talks of his encounter with GO in the book but I do not wish to reveal any spoilers.

Some of the books about Fischer and the cold war taking place can be quite interesting.



Enjoy!


Thank you very much :) I'll give it a look! It's something more than nothing lol I've heard about Lasker's thoughts on the subject a bit. Haven't read the book yet though. I suppose it's about time lol

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #12 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:35 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
leonprimrose wrote:
goTony wrote:
Lol! What an interesting subject. Yes there have been some very unusual Chess masters. Quite colorful really. I do not know about GO masters nearly as well.

I do believe the current Chess masters are more balanced, they love Chess, work at it devotedly, but they have other interests as well. They surely aren't the dedicated smokers they used to be. But they are not quite as colorful either.


Bonobo wrote:
Heh, I don’t know where you draw the line to “mad”, but I can personally attest that it’s perfectly possible to be a Go player and at the same time to be a neurotic :twisted: and to have depressions :-|

For me, Go is also a means of coping, as — I think — is anything that is challenging and enjoyable at the same time.


My thoughts involve computation vs creativity. Chess mimics computer thought processes whereas Go mimics the human thought. There's a quote: “Poets do not go mad; but chess-players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.” - G.K. Chesterton

Looking at most of present-day music scene, I would dispute this quote. Most of them seem absolutely nuts! As are many of the dancers I met, although much smaller percentage. I don't know that much about present day painters, sculptors, or writers. Historically, there were some/many cases...

Can it be that in "logical" profession(s), "mad" is a serious detriment, and so it gets attention and is recorded? In artistic and creative profession(s), "mad" can be beneficial (we call it by other words, like eccentric or something) - so it gets much less spotlight?

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!


Last edited by Bantari on Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

This post by Bantari was liked by 3 people: DrStraw, goTony, joellercoaster
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #13 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:36 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 50
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 2
Rank: 7k
Bantari wrote:
Looking at most of present-day music scene, I would dispute this quote. Most of them seem absolutely nuts! As do many of the dancers I met, although much smaller percentage. I don't know that much about present day painters, sculptors, or writers. Historically, there were some/many cases...

Can it be that in "logical" profession(s), "mad" is a serious detriment, and so it gets attention and is recorded? In artistic and creative profession(s), "mad" can be beneficial (we call it by other words, like eccentric or something) - so it gets much less spotlight?


That's a very good point actually. I hadn't considered that :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #14 Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 6:30 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
The Young Beethoven, the Mature Beethoven, the Mad Beethoven. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #15 Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:22 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 93
Liked others: 87
Was liked: 11
Rank: EGF mid sdk
Here we go again about the mad mathematicians...

People remember the ''mad'' ones because their life is more colorful. I might agree to the idea that the percentage of mathematicians that go bananas is higher than any other branch of science, it is definitely lower though than that of artists. Definitely

Also i agree with what leonprimrose said. It is expected from an artist to be a little crazy, but god forbid a scientist behaves a bit differently

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #16 Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 7:31 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 51
Liked others: 25
Was liked: 5
Rank: 4d
GD Posts: 262
Not even one mention of Fujisawa Shuko?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #17 Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:18 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2508
Liked others: 1304
Was liked: 1128
FlameBlade wrote:
Not even one mention of Fujisawa Shuko?


You did. Why?

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #18 Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:54 am 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5546
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1104
Was liked: 1457
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Polama wrote:
...
Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity...


I think that cause and effect are confused here. Writing poetry does not make one crazy; rather, crazy people gravitate toward poetry.

Are go players mad? Again, cause and effect are confused. We should be asking: do mad people choose go?
We are not chosen at random. We are a self-selected group.

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #19 Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:46 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Polama wrote:
...
Interestingly, there's even a name for the opposite hypothesis that poets are particularly susceptible to insanity...


I think that cause and effect are confused here. Writing poetry does not make one crazy; rather, crazy people gravitate toward poetry.


Good point. Besides, mathematics may be considered a form of poetry. So there you go. ;)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: The Psychology of the Encircling Game
Post #20 Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:10 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 546
Liked others: 18
Was liked: 81
KGS: FanXiping
OGS: slashpine
Chess exercises the left brain a lot, so if any madness arises among strong chess players it may be because of a left brain predominance. This may be one reason why many Grandmasters indulge in music, art, and fine dining, instead of becoming hardcore chess nerds; these three activities engage the right brain.

As well, this could be why Go is popular among mathematicians and information technology technicians. The game provides that bit of right brain creativity that might be lacking in an analysis-intensive discipline.

Go exercises both right and left brains. Which is why most pros lack any real hint of madness in their emotions. In fact, Go is a game known for promoting emotional stability. Also, womanizing is easier for the man that plays Go on a regular basis. Just look at Shuko.

Personally, I feel more inclined to understand human nature since I began playing and studying Go on a regular basis. Even evil people seem to have their reasons for doing what they do. Still not morally justifiable, but not as irrational as before. At least now I would not call a woman evil if she decided to break up with me out of the blue. Instead, I would attribute it to a cumulative process that ended in the break-up and my failure to understand that she had deep emotional needs that I did not bother to satisfy.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group