Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Off-joseki sequence after pincer? http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=12869 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | memotype [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
My question is about ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Anyway, this whole sequence just really confused me and I'm just curious to see what people think about it. In case it's relevant, this is a game on DGS. I'm ranked at 9k on there, and white is also 9k. |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi memotype, F3 for ![]() Suppose we ignore the global considerations for the moment. Locally, when you jump out to ![]() you have miai of two directions -- the grey areas: That's one meaning of jumping out to ![]() W plays ![]() ![]() One variation: BTW, what's the current position on DGS ? If ![]() to ask for advice at the moment... ( Any comments on ![]() ![]() |
Author: | macelee [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
And globally, ![]() Playing off-joseki moves is not necessarily a bad thing. As a simple rule, if you can find at least two good reasons for playing a move (like I just did), it is probably a reasonable move, on or off joseki. |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
memotype wrote: I couldn't see how I could pass up an opportunity to attack white's corner stone, but I wasn't sure what the right attack move was. My move at ![]() As a general principle, if you want to attack don't touch your opponent's stone(s). Attack from a distance. Ed's f3 is a perfect example of attacking and surrounding from a distance (it's what I'd play). |
Author: | memotype [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: ( Any comments on ![]() ![]() Here's the current board position: I'm mostly interested in feedback on my moves at ![]() ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi memotype, I started to edit a variation diagram, but then remembered/realized it could affect your on-going game, as mentioned, so I deleted the diagram. memotype wrote: but I have a much stronger group, and my plan wasn't to capture anyway, but to attach and push. I'd be interested to hear others' opinions on this, too,but my assessment is your group is not only not "much stronger," but actually still weak after your ![]() |
Author: | Tryss [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
Did you consider your 8 at E3? |
Author: | hyperpape [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
We can only say so much since it's an ongoing game, but compare the current board to the one after Ed's variation? Which do you prefer? Why? |
Author: | memotype [ Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
Tryss wrote: Did you consider your 8 at E3? Yes, as I explained in my original diagram, I was considering ![]() |
Author: | memotype [ Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Off-joseki sequence after pincer? |
hyperpape wrote: We can only say so much since it's an ongoing game, but compare the current board to the one after Ed's variation? Which do you prefer? Why? I think if I wanted to surround white, the variation where I play ![]() |
Author: | Uberdude [ Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
White's game 7 was very odd and let you get more than you deserved. The normal continuation would be something like this: You can see, that as often happens when you attach, both sides got stronger. As for: memotype wrote: I was considering ![]() Even if white can live in the corner it is a disaster, as white is separated into many groups. |
Author: | memotype [ Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Uberdude wrote: White's game 7 was very odd and let you get more than you deserved. Thank you, that's what I wanted to know. Seemed very odd to me, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something vital in white's play. Which is why I played ![]() ![]() Quote: The normal continuation would be something like this: You can see, that as often happens when you attach, both sides got stronger. As for: memotype wrote: I was considering ![]() Even if white can live in the corner it is a disaster, as white is separated into many groups. Good point, I should have thought of that. Again, white's play was so strange and unusual that I played overly cautious. I should have been more aggressive. Thanks again, this is pretty much exactly the kind of analysis I was looking for. |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:36 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi memotype, The variation in post 11 was the one I had already edited in post 6, but deleted it as the lower left corner is still not finished in your on-going game. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |