Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
To capture or not to capture? http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=17279 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | jlt [ Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:50 am ] |
Post subject: | To capture or not to capture? |
I recently watched videos about this joseki However, people say that White should not capture at ![]() After a few thousand playouts, Katago thinks that
It seems Katago evaluates the first ko threat at 5.4 points and the second one at 1.1 point, but I am not sure this conclusion is valid, things are not clear in my mind. In any case, taking directly 4 stones off the board is significantly more valuable than needing a sequence of alternating plays to remove them. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: To capture or not to capture? |
jlt wrote: I recently watched videos about this joseki However, people say that White should not capture at ![]() You are talking about the swing, although there is more to it that just taking stones. To compare it with, say, the first move in the game, you have to divide by two. The comparison, then, is between 14 pts. and 8 pts. plus. Edit: I do not have an explanation for KataGo's evaluations. How does KataGo compare ![]() |
Author: | jlt [ Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: To capture or not to capture? |
Concerning your last question: according to Katago after a few thousand playouts, ![]() After b-a, ![]() After b-a-d-c, ![]() P.S. In the initial post, I indeed forgot to divide by 2. The difference between (White captures, Black passes, White to play) and (White passes, Black captures, White to play) is 16 points plus something, so White should capture when the cost of passing is less than about 8 points. On an empty board, the cost of passing is twice (fair komi), which is about 14 points. |
Author: | lightvector [ Fri Feb 21, 2020 7:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: To capture or not to capture? |
I used a 40b256c network from KataGo that is in the middle of training right now, for around 50k playouts on each move.
So: It is repeatedly the case that playing in the lower left is too small. The per-move value of the raw territory in the lower left is something like 9 points (8 points due to the capture swing, 1 from territory on the first line). Which is quite a bit too small for the opening. The reason why playing elsewhere is only often 1 or 2 points worse is that there is extra value beyond the 9 points in outside forcing moves and group safety from resolving the capture. So this all makes sense. The a-b exchange costs black 1 point. The c-d exchange costs black another 5 points, at which point capturing is actually the largest move for white, white no longer wants to tenuki. Why? I'm pretty sure the answer is that KataGo senses that exchanging a-b in the lower left might in some variations reduce the effectiveness value of this forcing move when white resists by coming out at 'e', because black's stones down there have one fewer liberty. I'd be far from sure "1 point" is the right value for this, because it seems to me black can still follow with 'f' with about the same effect. So I don't entirely trust KataGo here, but it also seems plausible to me that it's right, there could well be variations where it matters. And exchanging c-d further is very bad for black, now white wants to respond locally to finish the capture, and then black entirely loses out on this forcing move, which would be helpful in building the center and limiting white's left side. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |