SoDesuNe wrote:
In fact I felt the only things which where beneficial, were those which required stones to be touched. Maybe this has something to do with how you learn best.
This probably has something to do with enriching the data, thereby making it more memorable (Bjork et al, 1978 performed a classic study about how this works).
Getting stronger at go is obviously based on knowledge (just take a lesson from someone like breakfast and be astounded at the breadth and depth of his knowledge), and on practical skills such as reading, and some meta-skills, including self-control, emotional intelligence and mind-reading (seriously, you can read a person`s mind by observing them carefully, and even on the internet you can often sense a great deal from such cues as the pace of their play or the style of their avatar and personal notes).
I have wasted many years of my go time on crackpot ideas (see "force feeding" on SL for a juicy, prime example) that were based on ignorance. Despite myself, I still want to get stronger, but from now on, I`m determined to use what science says about learning as my foundation. Obviously, I am not a psychologist, but it seems to me that most people base their study habits on a mixture of common-sense and experience, which does not always work very well, particularly and ironically when they really want to get good quickly. Instead of simply exhausting oneself with ten hours of grinding a day, could it be possible that you could get better results by working smarter? I ask this if only because I once noticed that I tended to show most improvement in things that I
wasn`t trying particularly hard in.
The point of the "ideal study session" is to present new information, to rehearse old information, and to work in harmony with the natural limitations of the brain.
Psyschology teaches that short term memory (STM) is quite limited, which is why a study session should not include too much new data. Neither should the data be too similar (I could learn a new star point joseki and a new 3-4 pincer line in one sitting, but not two or three new star point joseki), because the mind gets confused easily. STM is made up of quickly fading chemical traces. Review, especially at the point of forgetting, appears crucial to deepening these memory traces and turning them into new memories. Hence, a study session should include testing of things you have been working on recently, but which are not necessarily fresh in the mind. (There is a wealth of research on the Spacing Effect, but it seems good enough simply to ensure you test yourself when you feel your memory begin to fade, and eventually the memory won`t fade because it will have become LTM.)
Long term memory is probably an actual physical change in the brain, almost mechanical in nature. You can clap your hands or ride a bicycle because your brain is physically prepared for that. By some processes, what is in the STM is transferred to the LTM. Emotion appears to play a key role, as does sleeping, dreaming and simply resting. Therefore, it makes sense to rest the moment you feel that your head is full - it means that the memory buffer, the STM, is at capacity and time is required for memory transfer to begin. A good article about this is
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/biology/b1 ... arren.htmlIn addition, I strongly suspect that studying smart could be the key to help people of any age improve at go or chess or snooker or koto playing. The STM may decline in capacity with age, and one's concentration span may also decline, but so long as the ability to form new LTMs remains intact, progress ought still be possible by treating the brain kindly.
_________________
Learn the "tea-stealing" tesuji! Cho Chikun demonstrates here: