It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 3:11 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #1 Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 11:17 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 87
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 341
Was liked: 17
Rank: EGF 5kyu
Hey guys,

can you look at the first 50 moves of the following game and tell me whether the top and bottom right corner sequences were josekis and where the mistakes were? Of course you can look at the rest, too, but it is nothing to speak of.

I was Black.



Attachments:
Yannick123-Killerbee.sgf [5.99 KiB]
Downloaded 621 times
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #2 Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:54 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2495
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 443
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
Looks like black got swindled in both cases. In the top right, I don't think black should push in... it just removes a liberty from black. Maybe hane on top of the two white stones and let them run if white wants? I'm not entirely sure about how to handle the bottom right, but it looks like black should be able to cut white and fight.


This post by skydyr was liked by: Akura
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #3 Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:38 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 553
Liked others: 61
Was liked: 250
Rank: AGA 5 dan
In the upper right, B did fine through move 27. However, once B is secure on the outside, W must come back to add another defensive move. See if you can find a good attack for B in the game position. (B should be able to capture four stones in sente or play ko to kill the entire corner, depending on how W responds.)

In the lower right, I would not worry about joseki, but about direction of play, which is more important. At move 38, W invaded deep into a very strong B position. B should be able to profit by attacking this stone.

In the game, B used thickness to make territory directly, but then W was able to make compensating territory in the other direction, and overall B gain relatively little. Try counting the W and B positions after move 50, then look back to the position at move 38. It feels like B is entitled to more than he actually got. Another way to see this is to note that the B territory near Q12 is over-concentrated.

The right strategy for B is to attack from the left, pushing W toward the B thickness above. B will then profit by making new territory along the bottom side. As W runs, he will make little or no territory of his own. True, some of the potential territory near the B thickness will disappear, but the gains on the other side will more than compensate for this. Try playing out some simple sequences starting with move 38 at O4 or P5. Count the resulting territories for both sides and see how well B does, compared to the previous result.


This post by mitsun was liked by: Akura
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #4 Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:12 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
175 Ko threat was terrorable.
you should almost never play such ko threat.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: Akura
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #5 Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:41 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 87
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 341
Was liked: 17
Rank: EGF 5kyu
Thank you all for your replies.

@skydyr: In the top right corner I think I confused the situation with a joseki I once saw. Therefore the push-in.

@mitsun: During the game I thought that :b1: in the following diagram is definitly sente:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X c . b . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X O O a . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X X O . O |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . O . . . O X X X W . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X W W W X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O X X X 1 |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


But now I think that if White answers at 'a' or 'b', Black can catch the marked stones in sente. And if White answers at 'c', we get a ko for the whole corner.

At the bottom right you are right. I tried too fast to convert my influence to territory.

@Magicwand: Why shouldn't I play such ko threats? Because it eliminates further threats to the corner?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #6 Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:19 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Akura wrote:
@Magicwand: Why shouldn't I play such ko threats? Because it eliminates further threats to the corner?


if you see professionals using ko threat you will see that they alomst will never play ko threat that they will lose points..
you used ko threat to give his group life that he didnt have before.

learn basic life and death in the corner.
memorize them and you will be surprised how often they show up.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #7 Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:19 pm 
Dies with sente

Posts: 87
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 341
Was liked: 17
Rank: EGF 5kyu
This makes sense. Thank you!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #8 Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:07 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 759
Liked others: 114
Was liked: 916
Rank: maybe 2d
If you're not careful in choosing your threats, it's actually surprisingly easy to lose enough points to make winning the ko not worth it overall.

Say you have a ko to kill a medium sized group where the difference between winning and losing is a whole 40 points (you gain 40 if you win, you gain 0 if the opponent wins). Say that a regular move gains each player about 10 points, which is actually probably a low estimate for many midgames. And say that you have have several ko threats that lose 3-4 points each, and not enough non-losing ko threats. Note that even something as small as making a future first-line endgame hane no longer sente for yourself is already a loss of 3 points.

Scenario 1:
You fight the ko and in total play 4 ko threats each worth -3 points after the opponent answers. (-12)
Your opponent finally runs out of ko threats and plays a regular move. (-10)
You win the ko and kill the opponent's group. (+40)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +18

Scenario 2:
You stop fighting the ko when your non-losing threats run out and play a regular move. (+10)
Your opponent wins the ko and his group lives. (+0)
You play another regular move. (+10)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +20


This post by lightvector was liked by: illluck
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #9 Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:24 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
lightvector wrote:
If you're not careful in choosing your threats, it's actually surprisingly easy to lose enough points to make winning the ko not worth it overall.

Say you have a ko to kill a medium sized group where the difference between winning and losing is a whole 40 points (you gain 40 if you win, you gain 0 if the opponent wins). Say that a regular move gains each player about 10 points, which is actually probably a low estimate for many midgames. And say that you have have several ko threats that lose 3-4 points each, and not enough non-losing ko threats. Note that even something as small as making a future first-line endgame hane no longer sente for yourself is already a loss of 3 points.

Scenario 1:
You fight the ko and in total play 4 ko threats each worth -3 points after the opponent answers. (-12)
Your opponent finally runs out of ko threats and plays a regular move. (-10)
You win the ko and kill the opponent's group. (+40)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +18

Scenario 2:
You stop fighting the ko when your non-losing threats run out and play a regular move. (+10)
Your opponent wins the ko and his group lives. (+0)
You play another regular move. (+10)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +20

NO NO NO and NO
if you use -3 point ko threat..your opponent only need 37 after ko threat and 34 point ko threat 31 and 28..
which means his ko threat will increase... after few ko fight you alread lose that ko without fighting.
that is why you have to calculate all ko threat before starting it.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: illluck
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #10 Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:58 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 1223
Liked others: 738
Was liked: 239
Rank: OGS 2d
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Magicwand wrote:
lightvector wrote:
If you're not careful in choosing your threats, it's actually surprisingly easy to lose enough points to make winning the ko not worth it overall.

Say you have a ko to kill a medium sized group where the difference between winning and losing is a whole 40 points (you gain 40 if you win, you gain 0 if the opponent wins). Say that a regular move gains each player about 10 points, which is actually probably a low estimate for many midgames. And say that you have have several ko threats that lose 3-4 points each, and not enough non-losing ko threats. Note that even something as small as making a future first-line endgame hane no longer sente for yourself is already a loss of 3 points.

Scenario 1:
You fight the ko and in total play 4 ko threats each worth -3 points after the opponent answers. (-12)
Your opponent finally runs out of ko threats and plays a regular move. (-10)
You win the ko and kill the opponent's group. (+40)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +18

Scenario 2:
You stop fighting the ko when your non-losing threats run out and play a regular move. (+10)
Your opponent wins the ko and his group lives. (+0)
You play another regular move. (+10)
And it's your opponent's turn next.
Result: +20

NO NO NO and NO
if you use -3 point ko threat..your opponent only need 37 after ko threat and 34 point ko threat 31 and 28..
which means his ko threat will increase... after few ko fight you alread lose that ko without fighting.
that is why you have to calculate all ko threat before starting it.


I didn't know either reason before and just knew that you should avoid point-losing threats unless you must, so thanks a lot for the explanations! I think, though, that it's probably the combination of the two reasons (or it's really the same one, except expressed in different ways).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #11 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:09 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 87
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 341
Was liked: 17
Rank: EGF 5kyu
I obviously have no idea how to fight a ko. Thanks you, Magicwand and lightvector, but I think I need some time to digest what you have said.

@lightvector: Do you say that this :b1: loses 3 points when played as a ko threat?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . . 1 . .
$$ -----------[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Josekis? Nosekis?
Post #12 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:12 am 
Oza

Posts: 2495
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 443
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
Akura wrote:
I obviously have no idea how to fight a ko. Thanks you, Magicwand and lightvector, but I think I need some time to digest what you have said.

@lightvector: Do you say that this :b1: loses 3 points when played as a ko threat?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . X O . .
$$ . . . 1 . .
$$ -----------[/go]


He's saying that if you play a ko threat that turns :b1: into a gote move, it loses points.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group