Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Another one bites the dust http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=11591 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Pippen [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Another one bites the dust |
Two questions: 1. Biggest mistake White made till move 60? (My take: 28 instead of d6) 2. At which point White's chances to win where below 40%? (My take: from move 60) |
Author: | tentano [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
Is there a reasonable alternative to ![]() After ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() After ![]() |
Author: | Pippen [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
tentano wrote: Is there a reasonable alternative to ![]() In the game I thought about it more than a minute. It gives Black a wall and sente, but I still did it, because with that I got the upper side settled and Black couldn't make a shimari there anymore. I think it's ok. |
Author: | mitsun [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
Pippen wrote: tentano wrote: Is there a reasonable alternative to ![]() In the game I thought about it more than a minute. It gives Black a wall and sente, but I still did it, because with that I got the upper side settled and Black couldn't make a shimari there anymore. I think it's ok. As mitsun says, the result is not good for White. A loss of about 1/2 stone, I think. Also, his suggestion of the high approach at E-16 is usual here. In the bottom left, better to approach at C-05, making miai of C-03 and C-08. ![]() |
Author: | ystao [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
tentano wrote: Is there a reasonable alternative to ![]() After ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() After ![]() I also agree ![]() ![]() White chose the wrong joseki in bottom left I think. How about ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
There were a number of problem moves in the bottom left, resulting in a running group while Black mounts a good attack. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | ystao [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
Bill Spight wrote: Also, ![]() Yes, this is also good. |
Author: | Pippen [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
mitsun wrote: If you want to play first in that corner, maybe E16? Then if B plays the joseki starting with D17-E17, the W stone at K17 ends up on a good spot. Amazing. Now that you suggested it I almost feel humiliated for not seeing this obvious superior move (to what I played)^^. @all: At what point would you have seen no realistic chance to win for White? (Maybe not where you resign, but where you think "Cr..., this will be a long afternoon.) |
Author: | ez4u [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
Why did you play 6? doesn't this violate the 'Pippen fuseki' idea of splitting the side and then leaving that stone to be treated lightly? Shouldn't 6 have been a play against the lower left or something? ![]() |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
I agree that 8 feels wrong, but it is hard to say that it is really bad - maybe half a point as Bill says. Move 28? Well, we are all allowed a misclick now and then... ![]() But it is 62 that really disturbs me. You are picking a fight in the shadow of his wall. I would have played P6. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 5:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: I agree that 8 feels wrong, but it is hard to say that it is really bad - maybe half a point as Bill says. Sorry. Half a stone = half a handicap stone = 7 points or so. |
Author: | mitsun [ Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
The sequence ![]() ![]() |
Author: | tapir [ Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
mitsun wrote: The sequence ![]() ![]() Players aren't professionals. I wonder about W12, I probably would push a bit longer (gaining points in the corner because disabling Black moves there) instead of jumping ahead with W12 and use the stone already in place at 10-3 to finally "get ahead". |
Author: | skydyr [ Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
tapir wrote: mitsun wrote: The sequence ![]() ![]() Players aren't professionals. I wonder about W12, I probably would push a bit longer (gaining points in the corner because disabling Black moves there) instead of jumping ahead with W12 and use the stone already in place at 10-3 to finally "get ahead". Getting that wall in sente feels a lot more valuable than the territory white is taking. Black just needs to make a nice extension down the left side and the game feels hard for white. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
tapir wrote: mitsun wrote: The sequence ![]() ![]() Players aren't professionals. My opponents aren't pros, so it's OK if I make a few 10 kyu moves. Right? Quote: I wonder about W12, I probably would push a bit longer (gaining points in the corner because disabling Black moves there) instead of jumping ahead with W12 and use the stone already in place at 10-3 to finally "get ahead". More like this. ![]() |
Author: | tapir [ Thu Mar 12, 2015 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
My point: In the given circumstances W12 appears to be a mistake in itself, in other words a move not worthy of an aspiring player such as pippen, regardless of other mistakes earlier and later. |
Author: | zinger [ Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another one bites the dust |
The sequence 30-32-34 feels pretty optimistic. If black plays 35 at G7, white seems likely to be swallowed whole. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |