Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
1 lost game out of 4 played http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9251 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | tekesta [ Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:28 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | 1 lost game out of 4 played | ||
Today on IGS I played 4 games. Of these, 3 were handicap games in which I took White. The remaining one was an even game in which I took Black. I won all the handi games, but lost this one by 22.5 points. One thing that cost me the game - in addition to faster than usual playing - was the successful invasion of White 84 in the lower right corner. I now feel that, had Black 87 been avoided, White would've not had it so easy. Below is the game record. Much obliged in advance for your comments.
|
Author: | ez4u [ Thu Oct 24, 2013 12:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1 lost game out of 4 played |
Comments on a few early choices... In the diagram below ![]() ![]() ![]() Six seconds later (of your time that is ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I would probably play the double hane without thinking (being too lazy to read it out ![]() With ![]() ![]() You've already realized that 87 in the game was a poor choice. Almost any other move would have made it nearly impossible for White to live. Indeed, it would have been harder for White if Black had simply passed! ![]() |
Author: | tekesta [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1 lost game out of 4 played |
@illuck: No. 29 in the 2nd diagram was to being strengthening the Black group before White surrounded it. "Build strength by attacking another stone" is the proverb I tried to follow, but in hindsight I now wonder if it would've been better just to seal White in and let her live. I still need to practice dealing effectively with moyō invasions. In the 4th diagram, I was looking to make a living - although overconcentrated - group by using tesuji. Strategically speaking, in this game I see the same symptom from before, namely my failure to counter my opponent's plans on a global scale. One fault of mine is that I often let my opponent have 1 or 2 nice, big corners. I'll need to fight more if I am to let my opponent have a corner or two. Also, if Black 87 had been played at, let's say, q7, I would've won the game by 5-10 pts., barring losses elsewhere on the board. My opponent exploited my mistakes nicely ![]() |
Author: | illluck [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1 lost game out of 4 played |
While it is nice to get credit for something I didn't do, I guess you actually want to direct that question to ez4u ![]() |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1 lost game out of 4 played |
For move 17, O15 seems small when one corner is not yet secured. Remember: corners first, sides next, center last. |
Author: | ez4u [ Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1 lost game out of 4 played |
tekesta wrote: @illuck: No. 29 in the 2nd diagram was to being strengthening the Black group before White surrounded it. "Build strength by attacking another stone" is the proverb I tried to follow, but in hindsight I now wonder if it would've been better just to seal White in and let her live. I still need to practice dealing effectively with moyō invasions. In the 4th diagram, I was looking to make a living - although overconcentrated - group by using tesuji. Strategically speaking, in this game I see the same symptom from before, namely my failure to counter my opponent's plans on a global scale. One fault of mine is that I often let my opponent have 1 or 2 nice, big corners. I'll need to fight more if I am to let my opponent have a corner or two. Also, if Black 87 had been played at, let's say, q7, I would've won the game by 5-10 pts., barring losses elsewhere on the board. My opponent exploited my mistakes nicely ![]() The point about 29 is actually 31. If Black has to answer 30, then 29 was mistimed at best. In other words, 29 is not a case of "attacking another stone" if White connects out with 30 and 36. Black probably needs to go ahead and cut above 30 with 33, returning to the idea of sealing White in. In diagram 4 Black seems to have lost track of the real situation while fixating on "shapes"/"tesuji". Either of the diagrams below is much better for Black than the result in the game. After either one Black is strong and can invade the upper left and/or lower left corners with confidence. The "shape" moves in the game left Black not quite sure of having two eyes and therefore less able to reduce the top. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |