It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 3:09 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #1 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:20 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
This part rant, part cry for help.

Widescreens are a complete waste to me-an abomination. I do not play many games on my laptop (and those I do play are usually older and do not benefit from a widescreen--if they even support it), and I do not often watch movies. I do not need more space off to the side--I need more space for toolbars, etc. What's more, is that widescreens make laptops more cumbersome to carry around. Yet, from what I can tell, the industry has moved to the widescreen because they have become cheaper, and they sound bigger than they really are. I cannot overstate how much this annoys me. :evil:

I'm a longtime Thinkpad fan, as I've had great luck with them. But when I purchased my current laptop (last year, I think), I was horrified to discover that Lenovo had effectively abandoned any non-widescreen display.
So, I purchased a refurbished T61 with a 14.1 4:3 display. The Lenovo T61 doesn't seem to have the durability my IBM T41 had (the screen finally died on me after several years), so I'm worried I'll need to buy a new one.

Anyone know a good laptop manufacturer that still sells a computer with a non-widescreen display?

Btw, external monitors in 4:3 or 5:4 are getting hard and harder to find too.


This post by judicata was liked by: Li Kao
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #2 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:27 am 
Oza

Posts: 2180
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Liked others: 237
Was liked: 662
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Interesting, because I am typing this on a one-year-old Lenovo X61. It is supplied by my employer so I had no choice. It is way too small and I wish I did have a widescreen.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #3 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:32 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 643
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 115
Was liked: 102
Rank: KGS 3k
KGS: LiKao / Loki
On notebooks I understand the use of widescreens somewhat(But I'm still annoyed that old 15" notebooks had 800px vertical resolution, and new ones have less. Not what I call progress. And even for movies, which are the reason for wider screens 1280x800 is better, since 720p movies don't need to be scaled.
But for desktop monitors 4:3 is still the best resolution.
I even have put my task bar on the left so it doesn't cost me >50px on the bottom of the screen of my already scarce vertical resolution.

_________________
Sanity is for the weak.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #4 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:33 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1072
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 72
Rank: 5K KGS
GD Posts: 1165
KGS: Dogen
Wide screens are much better. You can have two or three windows open at the same time, and if you're working with multiple programs, it's a big improvement. I have a 27" desktop monitor, and I can have three windows laid out horizontally, and it's a big help.

The toolbar issue is a problem, especially the way Microsoft makes them. Just drag them off, though, and put them to the side. You'll end up not only with more vertical space, but it'll be easier to work with toolbars if they have more room on the side of the screen. (At least that's my experience.)

I find that people who want 4:3 screens are generally Windows users who are used to making every window fill the screen. Is that your case?

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #5 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:34 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1072
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 72
Rank: 5K KGS
GD Posts: 1165
KGS: Dogen
Li Kao wrote:
On notebooks I understand the use of widescreens somewhat(But I'm still annoyed that old 15" notebooks had 800px vertical resolution, and new ones have less.


My 13" MacBook Air has 1440x900. Current Macs all have more than 800 px vertical; maybe with PCs it's different?

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #6 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:37 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 643
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 115
Was liked: 102
Rank: KGS 3k
KGS: LiKao / Loki
The windows window-manager doesn't support tiling well, so there is no choice but maximizing windows. Guess I need to switch to linux sometime... And of course notebooks have such a small total resolution that non fullscreen windows don't work either.

_________________
Sanity is for the weak.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #7 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:39 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 448
Liked others: 127
Was liked: 34
Rank: Tygem 4d
GD Posts: 24
judicata wrote:
This part rant, part cry for help.

Widescreens are a complete waste to me-an abomination. I do not play many games on my laptop (and those I do play are usually older and do not benefit from a widescreen--if they even support it), and I do not often watch movies. I do not need more space off to the side--I need more space for toolbars, etc. What's more, is that widescreens make laptops more cumbersome to carry around. Yet, from what I can tell, the industry has moved to the widescreen because they have become cheaper, and they sound bigger than they really are. I cannot overstate how much this annoys me. :evil:

I'm a longtime Thinkpad fan, as I've had great luck with them. But when I purchased my current laptop (last year, I think), I was horrified to discover that Lenovo had effectively abandoned any non-widescreen display.
So, I purchased a refurbished T61 with a 14.1 4:3 display. The Lenovo T61 doesn't seem to have the durability my IBM T41 had (the screen finally died on me after several years), so I'm worried I'll need to buy a new one.

Anyone know a good laptop manufacturer that still sells a computer with a non-widescreen display?

Btw, external monitors in 4:3 or 5:4 are getting hard and harder to find too.

Ugh, toolbars, talk about ancient technology. :geek:

What size screen do you generally use? Most widescreens now have a high enough resolution for such issues to be irrelevant. By the way, did it ever occur to you that they may have switched to widescreen because that's what the majority of people actually want?

kirkmc wrote:
My 13" MacBook Air has 1440x900. Current Macs all have more than 800 px vertical; maybe with PCs it's different?

I want a 60" screen with a retina display like the iPhone 4. :)

_________________
"Those who calculate greatly will win; those who calculate only a little will lose, but what of those who don't make any calculations at all!? This is why everything must be calculated, in order to foresee victory and defeat."-The Art of War

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #8 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:06 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
kirkmc wrote:
I find that people who want 4:3 screens are generally Windows users who are used to making every window fill the screen. Is that your case?


Of course, our resident Mac superfan would come to the defense of widescreens :).

I run Ubuntu (except at work, but I have no choice on what laptop to use). And I have programs take up the whole screen when it makes sense to do so--for example, the more space you have to work on the layout of documents, etc., the better; likewise for viewing photos, and even playing go (I like a big go board). At home, I use both my external monitor and laptop screen.

nagano wrote:
By the way, did it ever occur to you that they may have switched to widescreen because that's what the majority of people actually want?


Yes. And? The majority of people apparently prefer Miley Cyrus over Arcade Fire...doesn't mean I have to be happy about it. (On a related note, I'm generally pro free markets, but that doesn't mean I have to be happy with where the market is going.)

I also prefer my laptops to be narrower so they don't take up as much room. Of course, smaller computers are available, but by their nature, widescreens will be smaller compared to a similar-width 4:3.

Apparently, I'm not alone. A Google search for "no widescreen laptops" turns up several related hits.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #9 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:06 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2508
Liked others: 1304
Was liked: 1128
The screen on my T41 recently died too. I've also been thinking about getting a refurbished T60, but first, I'm going to replace the screen on my T41 and see how much more life it has left in it. Too bad people can't leave good enough alone.

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #10 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:17 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
I'm a big fan of wide-screens. I use a 30" at work (2560x1600), and make my desktop even wider with a second screen - an older 20" rotated to portrait mode, for a total desktop area of 3760x1600. It's awesome. I can have multiple terminal windows and a browser window on the main screen, and my e-mail client on the second monitor, and everything I need right in my field of view.

Wide-screens make more efficient use of the field of view of human vision, which is significantly wider than it is tall. It's also much better at scanning horizontally than vertically, so it makes sense to add desktop area horizontally first. They also make laptops more portable - the minimum dimensions of a laptop are constrained by the size of the keyboard, which is much wider than it is tall.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku


This post by fwiffo was liked by 2 people: hyperpape, nagano
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #11 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:01 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1072
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 72
Rank: 5K KGS
GD Posts: 1165
KGS: Dogen
nagano wrote:
I want a 60" screen with a retina display like the iPhone 4. :)


Yes, but to be fair, I think you'd only need like 160 dpi for the same impression, given the distance. The new 27" display I have is 108 dpi, and the difference between that and the previous 24" Apple monitor I had is noticeable.

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #12 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:02 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1072
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 72
Rank: 5K KGS
GD Posts: 1165
KGS: Dogen
fwiffo wrote:
I'm a big fan of wide-screens. I use a 30" at work (2560x1600), and make my desktop even wider with a second screen - an older 20" rotated to portrait mode, for a total desktop area of 3760x1600. It's awesome. I can have multiple terminal windows and a browser window on the main screen, and my e-mail client on the second monitor, and everything I need right in my field of view.

Wide-screens make more efficient use of the field of view of human vision, which is significantly wider than it is tall. It's also much better at scanning horizontally than vertically, so it makes sense to add desktop area horizontally first.


Seconded.

If you want height, with a desktop, either get a monitor that rotates, or get two and use them as Fwiffo does.

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #13 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:23 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
My biggest frustration with widescreens is the apparent desire to replace vertical space with horizontal space. Like the OP, much of my work is with code, or documents, which are all basically more height than width (kinda like books and, you know, letters written and paper, that kind of thing!).

Sure, I could have two windows with 4:3, or, more desirably, 3:4 aspect ratios, but then all the text gets too itsy bitsy for my comfort. I would like more vertical space, and I do know that thisn't a particularly rare position to hold :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #14 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:33 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1072
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 72
Rank: 5K KGS
GD Posts: 1165
KGS: Dogen
topazg wrote:
My biggest frustration with widescreens is the apparent desire to replace vertical space with horizontal space. Like the OP, much of my work is with code, or documents, which are all basically more height than width (kinda like books and, you know, letters written and paper, that kind of thing!).

Sure, I could have two windows with 4:3, or, more desirably, 3:4 aspect ratios, but then all the text gets too itsy bitsy for my comfort. I would like more vertical space, and I do know that thisn't a particularly rare position to hold :)


I work with text, and the biggest advantage for me is having multiple windows horizontally. For example, I have a browser and email window taking up the width of my screen. When I work on text, I have my text editor at 80 character width, which leaves me plenty of room for a preview window (a lot of my writing is in HTML), and a third window, such as for a dictionary or other tool. I have poor eyesight, and use large fonts, and this works fine for me, at least with a 27" monitor. On my laptop it's obviously different, but I don't do much serious work there.

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #15 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:44 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
topazg wrote:
My biggest frustration with widescreens is the apparent desire to replace vertical space with horizontal space. Like the OP, much of my work is with code, or documents, which are all basically more height than width (kinda like books and, you know, letters written and paper, that kind of thing!).

Sure, I could have two windows with 4:3, or, more desirably, 3:4 aspect ratios, but then all the text gets too itsy bitsy for my comfort. I would like more vertical space, and I do know that thisn't a particularly rare position to hold :)


Of course, to each his own.

While our vision is wider than it is tall, as Fwiffo says, that does not mean wider is always better. For code and for documents, the wider lines get, the hard they are to follow. For watching movies and gaming (and I'm sure other applications), I won't deny that widescreen is better. But for the work I do (e.g, drafting/editing documents), widescreens add useless bulk to my laptop.

As for opening multiple windows... I want my laptop to be small. Using multiple windows makes no sense when drafting documents for which attention to detail is important (is that comma italicized? are those straight quotes or curly quotes? is that an en-dash, or em-dash?).

Do you turn e-book readers sideways? If so, you're the first person I've ever heard of doing so.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #16 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:03 pm 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 269
Location: Seattle
Liked others: 127
Was liked: 123
Rank: AGA 12k
GD Posts: 292
KGS: RedBeard
DGS: Akahige
nagano wrote:
[By the way, did it ever occur to you that they may have switched to widescreen because that's what the majority of people actually want?

Actually, LCD manufacturers have found that they can get more screens out of an LCD sheet by making the screens rectangular. There is less waste in the manufacturing process and therefore more profit. It has nothing to do with what the majority wants or what sells best.

Besides, if what was good for the majority was good for everyone, we would all be playing chess. Vive la différence! :D .

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #17 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:09 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
kirkmc wrote:
I work with text, and the biggest advantage for me is having multiple windows horizontally. For example, I have a browser and email window taking up the width of my screen. When I work on text, I have my text editor at 80 character width, which leaves me plenty of room for a preview window (a lot of my writing is in HTML), and a third window, such as for a dictionary or other tool. I have poor eyesight, and use large fonts, and this works fine for me, at least with a 27" monitor. On my laptop it's obviously different, but I don't do much serious work there.


For desktops I agree. I only use a 24" at work, but I love having it widescreen because I can get two very reasonable working areas. However, I also have to do a lot of serious work on a 14" laptop, and they really don't benefit from being widescreen. I'd much rather have something with the same horizontal width, a bit more bulk (physical weight), but enough extra height to make a 4:3 aspect ratio.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #18 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:11 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
judicata wrote:
topazg wrote:
My biggest frustration with widescreens is the apparent desire to replace vertical space with horizontal space. Like the OP, much of my work is with code, or documents, which are all basically more height than width (kinda like books and, you know, letters written and paper, that kind of thing!).

Sure, I could have two windows with 4:3, or, more desirably, 3:4 aspect ratios, but then all the text gets too itsy bitsy for my comfort. I would like more vertical space, and I do know that thisn't a particularly rare position to hold :)


Of course, to each his own.

While our vision is wider than it is tall, as Fwiffo says, that does not mean wider is always better. For code and for documents, the wider lines get, the hard they are to follow. For watching movies and gaming (and I'm sure other applications), I won't deny that widescreen is better. But for the work I do (e.g, drafting/editing documents), widescreens add useless bulk to my laptop.

As for opening multiple windows... I want my laptop to be small. Using multiple windows makes no sense when drafting documents for which attention to detail is important (is that comma italicized? are those straight quotes or curly quotes? is that an en-dash, or em-dash?).

Do you turn e-book readers sideways? If so, you're the first person I've ever heard of doing so.


Am I missing something here? I thought I pretty much agreed with everything you said in your OP?? :scratch:

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #19 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:17 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 448
Liked others: 127
Was liked: 34
Rank: Tygem 4d
GD Posts: 24
Redbeard wrote:
nagano wrote:
By the way, did it ever occur to you that they may have switched to widescreen because that's what the majority of people actually want?

Actually, LCD manufacturers have found that they can get more screens out of an LCD sheet by making the screens rectangular. There is less waste in the manufacturing process and therefore more profit. It has nothing to do with what the majority wants or what sells best.

Besides, if what was good for the majority was good for everyone, we would all be playing chess. Vive la différence! :D .

Really? Get back to me in a hundred years and tell me how much more popular chess is. ;-) But seriously, I understand. My tastes and views are almost always in the minority, if not obscurity.

_________________
"Those who calculate greatly will win; those who calculate only a little will lose, but what of those who don't make any calculations at all!? This is why everything must be calculated, in order to foresee victory and defeat."-The Art of War

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: RIP Non-Widescreens
Post #20 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:38 pm 
Tengen

Posts: 4382
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Liked others: 499
Was liked: 733
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
1. I often had two windows side by side on my old 13" laptop--one for my text editor, one for material that I was referencing. These were usually academic papers: I can see how you might want a taller screen for coding.

2. I read in landscape on my iPad, but perhaps that's comfort and the design of the case that I use.

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group