Shawn Ligocki wrote:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Wrong Answer \nThe responses a-d are all inferior to the correct answer.
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X . X . . X , . .
$$ | . . . . . . c . d . O .
$$ | . . . . . . b a O . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ -------------------------[/go]
I thought that b would be the best way to stop white, because I was also worried about the black response paKO posted. Any explanation for why the shoulder hit is better than the one-point approach?
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X . X . . # , . .
$$ | . . . . . . . 2 . . O .
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . O . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ -------------------------[/go]
After

, white can occupy the
Elephant's eye at

which threatens to cut off the marked black stone or further reduce the corner. After...
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . 8 7 . . . . .
$$ | . . X X . X 6 3 # , . .
$$ | . . . . . 5 4 2 a . O .
$$ | . . . . . d 1 b O c . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ -------------------------[/go]
... the marked stone is still cut off. Black can try to also cut off white with the a-b-c sequence, but this seems to become quite messy, since w can capture at d and either live at the bottom or re-connect his stones to the right.
@Ortho: Obviously your variation works better than mine given above

Initially, I was not sure about possible corner aji but I cannot find anything that works for w.
EDIT:
If w has many big ko threats elsewhere, he could at least try the following:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . X . . X , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X 5 4 O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O 1 O 3 a b . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 2 . 6 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
With the a-b exchange it's a two-step ko, but if w wins it that would be a big endgame for w lateron. I was also thinking of
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 8 7 a . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X 9 X 6 b X , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 4 X 5 . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O 1 O 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
The white move 4 threatens to play on 5 in sente - thus it forces b to connect in bad shape. If b follows the above given sequence, w can atari at a and connect at b which looks complicated. With a solid corner position I think

is the best move for b - however in the given situation I am not completely sure. I would appreciate if someone could point out a failsafe variation for b after
