It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 6:54 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #1 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:01 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
I just had this joseki come up in a game (I'm white):

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm1
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . 3 . 6 5 . . |
$$ . . . . . X 7 . . |
$$ . . . . . 0 8 9 . |
$$ . . . . . 4 1 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm11
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 4 2 3 . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]

My opponent played :b12:, which is not joseki as far as I'm aware (should be directly at :b14:). It doesn't seem like black should get the hane-connect for free if it's not joseki... But I'm having trouble coming up with a response for white that isn't worse than joseki. As the game went, I played it badly and I'm going to die. It doesn't seem like this position should really be that confounding!

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #2 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:05 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Seems slightly more gote-ish for black the way he played. White might still answer, but I feel slightly more inclined to tenuki this way.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #3 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:10 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #4 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:15 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Indeed, pros never play :b12:. I can't see why not though. :scratch:

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #5 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:17 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
fwiffo wrote:
I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.


Do you mean white needs to protect after black connects? The corner is small already, so there isn't much to reduce. I think if black can't kill, white should probably tenuki.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #6 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:20 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
oh wait, I see now...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm11 Gote... (can't kill white)
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 4 2 3 . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm11 sente...
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 2 3 . . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


edit: wait, maybe I spoke too soon... :/

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #7 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:23 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
If white doesn't play another move after the hane-connect, white can be pushed around badly just to survive. So yeah, black can't kill, but white will be forced to crawl on the second line to live or be shut in badly.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #8 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:29 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
fwiffo wrote:
If white doesn't play another move after the hane-connect, white can be pushed around badly just to survive. So yeah, black can't kill, but white will be forced to crawl on the second line to live or be shut in badly.


My gut feeling is that White only has 8 points anyway. Sente at corner joseki stage is surely worth more than the reduction possibilities Black has, provided White is unconditionally alive? Which I suppose means the descent is a definite kill threat.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #9 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:38 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
daniel_the_smith wrote:
Indeed, pros never play :b12:. I can't see why not though. :scratch:


According to a quick GoGoD search, the first 11 moves appear in only 15 games.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #10 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:41 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
fwiffo wrote:
I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.


IMO, the point is that white may still protect, but he is less inclined to protect than with the joseki sequence. Sente is based on the amount of points something is worth.

So let's say that joseki makes it worth X points for white to defend. I believe that it is worth less than X points for white to defend in this position - say Y points.

So if something is on the board valued between X and Y, that would make the difference between this and joseki.

In other words, :w13: in the second diagram of your first post is valuable.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #11 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:24 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
I'm being a little bit unclear. I'm also being a little bit cagey because I'm analysing an alternate history of a game-in-progress and don't want to spoil it.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm15
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . a . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . c . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X b . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]

I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b. In the game, I cut at c and ended up in a bad way. My opponent has since blundered and let me off the hook - I even got to use a nose tesuji for the first time ever, but that's a whole nuther thread.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #12 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:36 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
fwiffo wrote:
I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b.


Are you saying black a or b kills? If not - white has maybe 7 points in the corner. If black reduces that to 2 points, black gets 5 points. If this is the opening, surely there is a move elsewhere worth more than 5 points?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #13 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:42 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
fwiffo wrote:
I'm being a little bit unclear. I'm also being a little bit cagey because I'm analysing an alternate history of a game-in-progress and don't want to spoil it.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm15
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . a . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . c . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X b . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]

I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b. In the game, I cut at c and ended up in a bad way. My opponent has since blundered and let me off the hook - I even got to use a nose tesuji for the first time ever, but that's a whole nuther thread.


I would be tempted to. I mean, playing locally is big, but:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm15
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . 1 . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . O . X O 2 . |
$$ . . . . . X O . 4 |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . a . . . |
$$ . . . . b . X 3 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


Because of the cut aji at "a", Black's going to want to play it or "b" at some point, giving White yet another free move. White can't be killed either:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm15
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . 1 . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . O . X O 2 . |
$$ . . . . . X O . 3 |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . a 6 . 8 |
$$ . . . . . 7 X 4 . |
$$ . . . . . . . 5 . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


Is simply alive, ignoring the remaining aji at "a". So, if we say that Black seals White in to only having about 2 or 3 points, and he had 8 points before, it's a loss of only 5-6 points + some ambiguous points for Black's thickness. In the late opening early middle game I understand a lot of moves are worth ~20 points or so (I remember this from a post-game discussion writeup where they played that "card go" game or whatever where the players could claim points and pass instead of move).

The argument being that actually the global temperature frequently goes up (increasing move value) after a few stones are down compared to an empty board.

So, for the loss of maybe 10 or so points I'd gladly take sente for something in the opening (bearing in mind that after :w22: in the above diagram, Black now really wants to protect at "a" too).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #14 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:53 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
My judgement was that the influence from sealing white in - not just white's points lost in territory - make it too big to tenuki. But that's based on my eye's judgment, so I may be overestimating that.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #15 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:55 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
fwiffo wrote:
My judgement was that the influence from sealing white in - not just white's points lost in territory - make it too big to tenuki. But that's based on my eye's judgment, so I may be overestimating that.


That makes sense. I just consider White already completely sealed in ;)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #16 Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:01 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 55
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 33
Rank: EGF 6d
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wworse for Black
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 4 2 3 . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]




Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 2 3 . . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


:w13: is possible, not needed though. Depends on the players style.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Worse for Black
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . 2 . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ 1 . . O . X O a . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ 9 . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . 4 3 . . |
$$ . . . . . . X 5 . |
$$ . . . . . . 6 7 . |
$$ . . . . . , 8 b . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


A and B is miai, please note that white 1 and 9 is just showing tenuki.
Ideally they will be at middle-hoshi (K16) and an approach in upperleft-corner. Black gets thick but white is fast. This variation is slightly inferior to the next one because: Probably Black will exchange B for A which could have been better if he had extended immediately:



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Worse for Black
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . X . 2 . |
$$ 1 . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ 9 . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . 4 3 . . |
$$ . . . . . . X 5 . |
$$ . . . . . . 6 7 . |
$$ . . . . . , 8 b . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Worse for Black
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . X a X . |
$$ O . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ O . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O O . |
$$ . . . . . X O . 2 |
$$ . . . . . . X O . |
$$ . . . . . . X O . |
$$ . . . . . , X 1 . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]



In this variation, later Black can connect at a in sente (or capture the 2 stones in sente as payment, Black will most likely get this move in yose). Like this, Blacks territority in the corner is bigger than the other variation.

Also there is also another reason,



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . 6 4 5 . |
$$ . . . . . 2 3 7 . |
$$ . . . O . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X O . . |
$$ . . . . . X X O . |
$$ . . . . . X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . , . . . |[/go]


If Black later can get 4 and 6 in sente, it will help him attacking/developing the top. Please note that the amount of territority in white's corner would be the same as if Black hane and white defended on the first line. ( :b3: :w7: :b2: :w5: ).


Last edited by Fredrik on Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

This post by Fredrik was liked by 3 people: daniel_the_smith, fwiffo, topazg
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Post #17 Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:49 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
That totally clears it up for me. Awesome.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group