I draw two conclusions:

You practice blitz, so you're relatively good at blitz.

Your overall progress is slower than it could be (according to yourself).

Even when playing blitz you should be reading and counting as much as you can in the time you have. Sure you need intuition to help pick what moves to read out in the first place since your time is so limited in blitz games but just picking a spot and immediately playing it based on intuition is bad.

Intuition is good but so is calculation. I think you should use both when you play, not just one or the other. Also I have to say, without calculating and reading in a game, I find it hard to improve. Quality over quantity and if you read out variations and stuff in the game, that's quality, if you just click at a spot that looks good and hope it works that's just stupid. I have been guilty of such behaviour many times and every single time I find that the quality of my game deteriorates vastly and I find it hard to learn from the game and to find mistakes. For improving, one game where you read out variations is better than 50 games where you just click at a spot that seems good.

But I'm not bashing intuition, it's great and helpful, just make sure your move works.

...

Actually, I rarely play blitz games. However, when I do play, I tend to dominate my opponents. I've probably played a grand total 0f 10 or so Blitz games over 2 years. And I've played around 700 total...

I suspect that you are moving much deeper into game analysis than you realise.

What you might have meant to discuss for learning purposes is experience versus analysis. However, I am going to answer the more interesting question you pose with regards to intuition.

I am a very strong games all-rounder because of my ability to play intuitively. I am what is known as a shape player. This is an entirely different skill set to counting positions and analysing.

Thinking ahead can still be done intuititively, have you seen Gary Kasparov's eyes flitting over the board when he was playing deep blue.

You always have an image of a position in your mind, when you can see an actual position a stronger image is formed. This is why blindfold play is weaker than normal play. So a level of thought is needed to safeguard against mistakes.

To progress to the very top of any game requires that you add extra information to your skill sets to gain the extra edge. However, most of the time this is a waste of time as your instinctive move remains unaltered but sometimes it will decide the game.

Shape recognition represents the strongest of all game skills and is in effect a measure of someone's natural ability. The top go players in the world must be strong at shape recognition. However, you can't just increase your shape recognition by playing games. You can improve rapidly as you find patterns that your opponent uses but this is a subtley different skill. Similarly analysis can be improved by practise.

So back to the original question. if you are the most natural go player ever born you could become a professional dan player without ever studying any analysis but you will never reach the top of the game on intuition alone.

The strongest natural games player ever, I saw draw with a top chess GM rated over 700 points higher than himself with black and he used less than 5 minutes on his own clock. He is the only human player I have ever met who I will lose to if I try to keep tempo with him. However, the players which beat him (at any game) had to not only have natural ability but the discipline to think too.

LOL! Good one H! Essentially all your games posted here are blitz. You start with 25 minutes main time and finish the game in 15 minutes.

I don't understand the difference between "intuition style" and "not knowing how to use your time."

Everyone uses intuition to come up with plausible looking moves. 75% of the game is then using your time to calculate, reason, and determine which of those moves seems best. By stopping at step 1, I don't think you are playing a different style -- you are just playing worse.