Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
How to respond in this case? http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=11063 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | gostudent [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:30 am ] |
Post subject: | How to respond in this case? |
In the following sequence, B5 cannot tenuki, because there is a sequence after W6 B7 that will make white very thick. However, if B7 plays this way, it seems to lead to a fight that white is not easy to win: I have tried different sequences, and it seems that the black corner group cannot be killed. One example sequence is White plays at a cannot save the two white stone because of snapback, and white playing at b or c also doesn't seem to work either. Is there any sequence to kill black that I miss? If black is alive, how should white respond after the cut? Thanks. |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:15 am ] |
Post subject: | |
How do you feel about this ? W gets a lot of cash, and B has a heavy group. |
Author: | schawipp [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
How about a move like ![]() ![]() Update: I have not tested ![]() Update II: Another possible variation after ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
gostudent wrote:
White plays at a cannot save the two white stone because of snapback No. Read again and find the correct reason W(a) fails.
|
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
schawipp wrote: How about a move like ![]() ![]() Whilst I applaud your creativity, this is bonkers. gostudent's hane is a much better feeling (take a liberty of black's empty triangle, make your stones stronger, reduce eyespace). Black just stops connection on one side, white thinly connects the other (still problem at a/b later) and then cuts and white can't keep it all together. schawipp wrote: Update: I have not tested thoroughly and EdLee's variation is probably good enough. Not just good enough, but better. |
Author: | gostudent [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: gostudent wrote:
White plays at a cannot save the two white stone because of snapback No. Read again and find the correct reason W(a) fails.I am thinking about the following sequence, and white cannot connect at 2 because black can simply take at a. And B6 is at 2 to capture the 3 white stones. Then b and the key point of the three stones would be miai. |
Author: | gostudent [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: How do you feel about this ? W gets a lot of cash, and B has a heavy group. Thanks. It is a fairly good result for white. A lesson for me here is that, after W1 and B2, the 3-3 point becomes so vital that white has to take it -- letting black play there would almost surely lead to black life. So I have to allow black to escape. Since the running group is heavy, even though I might not be able to kill it, I should get plenty in return. On the other hand, if I insist on surrounding, after black plays at 3-3 and makes life, I would be in a very bad situation with two weak groups. |
Author: | EdLee [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
gostudent wrote: I am thinking about the following sequence... Hi GoStudent,Yes, we knew what you were thinking. ![]() Please read again. You're still missing something very basic. ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
schawipp wrote: Another possible variation... ( Diagram edited for clarity. )Hi schawipp, Putting aside ![]() the ![]() If B wants to wedge ![]() without the exchange [ ![]() ![]() If ![]() |
Author: | Uberdude [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
gostudent wrote: A lesson for me here is that, after W1 and B2, the 3-3 point becomes so vital that white has to take it -- letting black play there would almost surely lead to black life. So I have to allow black to escape. Since the running group is heavy, even though I might not be able to kill it, I should get plenty in return. On the other hand, if I insist on surrounding, after black plays at 3-3 and makes life, I would be in a very bad situation with two weak groups. I wouldn't say very bad, like this is also playable for white. You are cut, but neither group is particularly weak. In fact when you let black escape I want to press black down at 5 (rather than backing off at 8 which might be good enough but I want to play as severely as possible) but then it gets rather complicated, I didn't finish reading who is overplaying here. If black turns white is plenty happy with the jump: |
Author: | schawipp [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
Thanks EdLee and Uberdude for the corrections! I have not yet encountered black's original response (the empty triangle) but if that happens now, I should know what to do! ![]() |
Author: | Uberdude [ Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
Btw, if you hane first the empty triangle is actually a strong move, better than crawling at a (Of course you usually don't want to kick and then tenuki, but maybe the tenuki was actually a pincer around b). |
Author: | gostudent [ Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: gostudent wrote: I am thinking about the following sequence... Hi GoStudent,Yes, we knew what you were thinking. ![]() Please read again. You're still missing something very basic. ![]() Do you mean the following sequence? and then either or |
Author: | EdLee [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
gostudent wrote: Do you mean the following sequence? No. No throw-in. No snapback.
|
Author: | oca [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 7:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: gostudent wrote: I am thinking about the following sequence... Hi GoStudent,Yes, we knew what you were thinking. ![]() Please read again. You're still missing something very basic. ![]() Oups... I'm missing that too ![]() |
Author: | illluck [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 7:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: No. No throw-in. No snapback. |
Author: | EdLee [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi illluck, Technical issue about the diagrams: This one shows an "open" board toward the center: This one is a closed 19x6 board: Big difference. If you want to see the solution, you can open the above hidden text. |
Author: | oca [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
Thank you Edlee, I got it... Seeing throw in everwhere even when there is a simple solution seems to be a new bad habit I developped... |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Nov 17, 2014 12:38 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi oca, you're welcome. |
Author: | oca [ Mon Nov 17, 2014 4:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: How to respond in this case? |
EdLee wrote: Hi oca, you're welcome. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |