Life In 19x19
http://www.lifein19x19.com/

why not joseki + what about this move ?
http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=11789
Page 1 of 1

Author:  otenki [ Tue May 05, 2015 1:06 pm ]
Post subject:  why not joseki + what about this move ?

Aparently 4 is bad for black but i'm not sure why...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


Also if you go this route you can get:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


Howhever what if black play this move:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 0 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


I don't even see how this 9 is doable for white ...

Thanks!
Otenki

Author:  Bki [ Tue May 05, 2015 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . 1 . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


This peep?

Author:  skydyr [ Tue May 05, 2015 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

The reason why it's not joseki is that white's original pincering stone is not under much pressure, but it's blocking black exactly where black would want to extend to secure eyespace. If you look at the 5-4 joseki where black attaches as in your diagram, black follows it up with an extension down the left side. White's pincer stone here blocks that, so black has to move into the center, but he doesn't have clear eyespace, he's not exerting a lot of pressure on the white upperside group, and the left side stone is light and flexible.

Regarding your :b10: I think that black's shape is a bit too weak for this. White should be able to peep and cut or something similar, without reading into it too much.

Author:  EdLee [ Tue May 05, 2015 1:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hi otenki, the order also matters; a common sequence:
( Rotated for space :) )
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W :b8: pincer around grey regions
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 . 4 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 , 2 . . 3 . ? ? .
$$ | . 7 6 a . . . . . ? ? .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | -----------------------[/go]
B exchanges :b6: with :w7: , but does not pull back at (a), and pincers instead.
Pulling back to (a), like :b6: in your 2nd diagram, may be heavy for B.

Later, if W ataris at (a) = :wc:, then B blocks at :b1: .
If W does not capture, B can drop to :b3: .
Now B has miai of (b) and (c):
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B :w2: tenuki
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . X . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O b X . . O .
$$ | . O X W 1 . . . .
$$ | . . 3 c . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | -----------------[/go]
( If :w2: does capture at :b3: , then B has blocked at :b1: in sente. )

Author:  Uberdude [ Tue May 05, 2015 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Answer at a. Easy peasy.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . a . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 0 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


P.S. this is consistent with the laid back 9, simply connecting. You could also think about more aggressive moves for 9 like cutting black's thin 2 space jump.

Author:  ez4u [ Tue May 05, 2015 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

otenki wrote:
...

Also if you go this route you can get:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


...

Thanks!
Otenki

Normally we end up with this 9 instead.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

Author:  otenki [ Wed May 06, 2015 9:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

ez4u wrote:
otenki wrote:
...

Also if you go this route you can get:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


...

Thanks!
Otenki

Normally we end up with this 9 instead.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


That makes a lot of sense, in that case josekipedia should be updated :-)
http://josekipedia.com/#path:qdodldqcrcpcreogqh

Cheers,
Otenki

Author:  otenki [ Wed May 06, 2015 9:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Thanks for the replies guys... gives me things to think about and check !

Cheers,
Otenki

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/