Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6950 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
A position from the interesting Malkovich game #158: Probably a basic question, but why was ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
Don't worry, I have just seen it: Black can escape from the ladder by capturing the 2 Black stones! |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:07 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Peter, first of all, ![]() The result is too good for W -- so don't learn this as a 'joseki'. Second, could you show your sequence if B cuts at (b)? This will answer your last question why W fixed (a) but not (b). |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: Peter, first of all, ![]() That move looked odd to me, but I was giving the player (who is much stronger than I am) the benefit of the doubt. Thanks for pointing out something that I should NOT try to learn from. EdLee wrote: Second, could you show your sequence if B cuts at (b)? (This will answer your question why W fixed the cut at (a) but not at (b)). I think I have answered my own question: Black can escape from a ladder at A, but not from one at B? |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
PeterPeter wrote: Black can escape from a ladder at A, but not from one at B? It sounds like you figured out what happens if B cuts at (a).Now please show us (and other beginners) the sequence you figured out if B cuts at (b). ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
Am I missing something? I don't see a good outcome for Black after ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:45 am ] |
Post subject: | |
PeterPeter wrote: Am I missing something? Yes. ![]() In other words, if we change to following board, W would still play ![]() ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
Oh I see. I don't see an escape for Black from this net: |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Very good! ![]() ![]() Here is one joseki -- W also plays ![]() ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
This looks very similar. White could set a net at c. |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:21 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Good. Follow-up question: what about ![]() ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
White would set a net with ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes -- what if B ataris with ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
White will connect with ![]() ![]() ![]() I had to consider a lot of variations to decide on this main line - how did I do? ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() PeterPeter wrote: This shape is a disaster for W. ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
While you work on ![]() ![]() W has two ways to fix that cut: tiger's mouth (right) or solid connect (left). The tiger's mouth is better. Why? Try to name as many reasons as you can. (I have to crash now! ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cutting point in 3-3 invasion joseki |
I see it now, White forces a bigger capture after ![]() If Black captures with ![]() ![]() |
Author: | PeterPeter [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
EdLee wrote: :w8: was bad -- try again. ![]() PeterPeter wrote: This shape is a disaster for W. ![]() Because Black can play at A? |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
PeterPeter wrote: I see it now, White forces a bigger capture after Good! That's called a squeeze. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:38 am ] |
Post subject: | |
PeterPeter wrote: Because Black can play at A? (*) Because W's shape is crushed. See:http://senseis.xmp.net/?SqueezingOutTheToothpaste and http://senseis.xmp.net/?SmallGaps (*) Also, because W should've gotten the following result -- compare the two! ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |