It is currently Fri Jul 23, 2021 11:34 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1057 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 53  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #901 Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 1:19 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Oh, yes. Generally speaking the point of Black starting on the 2-2 is to make the ko, not to generate ko threats. :)

Up until now we have focused on the play that you discovered where Black makes the ko, despite neither player having a ko threat, now or later.

Evaluation of kos, except for placid kos, depends upon what assumptions we make. Berlekamp's brilliant komaster analysis depends upon assumptions that are usually not met exactly on the go board, but which provide useful approximate limits. When neither side is komaster, he came up with the idea of a neutral threat environment (NTE), where each player has the exact opposite of the ko threats of the other, where the ko threats are sufficiently large. How good an approximation NTE produces in practice is another question, but let's give it a shot.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | C 5 4 2 X . . . . |
$$ | 1 C O O X . . . . |
$$ | C C O X X . . . . |
$$ | C O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 3 X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w1: gets a local score of -5 in one net play.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, no ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 4 3 1 X . . . . |
$$ | . 2 O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . . . . |
$$ | 6 O O X . . . . . |
$$ | 5 O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 7 X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b1: gets a net local score of -3 in one net play.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 7 2 . 4 X . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O O X . . . . |
$$ | 3 . O X X . . . . |
$$ | 6 O O X . . . . . |
$$ | 5 O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

Now we have reached a position after one net move by Black such that either player, playing first could win the ko in two local plays by ignoring the opponent's threat.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X O . O X . . . . |
$$ | 1 X O O X . . . . |
$$ | X 3 O X X . . . . |
$$ | O O O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b2: = ko threat, :b4: completes threat

After :b4: there is a local score of -7 plus a gote worth on average 0 when t > 1.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X W 1 W X . . . . |
$$ | C X W W X . . . . |
$$ | X 3 W X X . . . . |
$$ | W W W X . . . . . |
$$ | X W X X . . . . . |
$$ | C X . . . . . . . |
$$ | C X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w2: = ko threat, :w4: completes threat

After :w4: there is a local score of +21.

By assumption, what each player gains by playing and completing their threat is the same, and therefore cancel out in the average, so the average value of the given position under NTE when t > 1 is the average of the value of these two politions. That value is (21 - 7)/2 = 7, 10 points better than -3. ;)

So, under NTE conditions, the average value of the corner is (7 - 5)/2 = 1, and the miai value of a play is 6.


Though I follow your calculation the conclusion does not fit with my understanding of the miai value basic concept. For me a miai value of say "6" means that each player has to play in the local area when the temperature drops under 6.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . . . . |
$$ | . O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Without any ko threat in the environment I do not think white has to play in this local area when temperature drops under 6 do you?
For a simple direct ko I have no problem with miai values but here the ko in the corner is more complex and in the initial position black is the only one who can start the ko. In that case it appears quite difficult to calculate a miai value without changing its basic concept.
My feeling is that, by starting the ko, black increases the temperature but that does not mean that the intial miai value is that high.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #902 Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 1:38 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | . . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O a . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 2 . b X X O O . |
$$ | a 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O a . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


BTW, if you do not know the white move at "a" and you play white "b" then black is komaster and is able to kill the top left white corner.
Otherwise if white plays "a" he will be able to save his group by playing first at "a" and black has no more ko threat. But note that by playing at "a" white do not play in the environment in order to gain t points and that means that the black ko threat allows black to add t + 1 to her score (t for a play in the enviroment and +1 for the white move in white territory).
I do not know what is the correct wording here. Certainly black in not "komaster" but her ko threat cannot be ignore and will assure some good points.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #903 Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 5:55 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Oh, yes. Generally speaking the point of Black starting on the 2-2 is to make the ko, not to generate ko threats. :)

Up until now we have focused on the play that you discovered where Black makes the ko, despite neither player having a ko threat, now or later.

Evaluation of kos, except for placid kos, depends upon what assumptions we make. Berlekamp's brilliant komaster analysis depends upon assumptions that are usually not met exactly on the go board, but which provide useful approximate limits. When neither side is komaster, he came up with the idea of a neutral threat environment (NTE), where each player has the exact opposite of the ko threats of the other, where the ko threats are sufficiently large. How good an approximation NTE produces in practice is another question, but let's give it a shot.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | C 5 4 2 X . . . . |
$$ | 1 C O O X . . . . |
$$ | C C O X X . . . . |
$$ | C O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 3 X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w1: gets a local score of -5 in one net play.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, no ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 4 3 1 X . . . . |
$$ | . 2 O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . . . . |
$$ | 6 O O X . . . . . |
$$ | 5 O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 7 X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b1: gets a net local score of -3 in one net play.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 7 2 . 4 X . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O O X . . . . |
$$ | 3 . O X X . . . . |
$$ | 6 O O X . . . . . |
$$ | 5 O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

Now we have reached a position after one net move by Black such that either player, playing first could win the ko in two local plays by ignoring the opponent's threat.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X O . O X . . . . |
$$ | 1 X O O X . . . . |
$$ | X 3 O X X . . . . |
$$ | O O O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b2: = ko threat, :b4: completes threat

After :b4: there is a local score of -7 plus a gote worth on average 0 when t > 1.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, NTE
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X W 1 W X . . . . |
$$ | C X W W X . . . . |
$$ | X 3 W X X . . . . |
$$ | W W W X . . . . . |
$$ | X W X X . . . . . |
$$ | C X . . . . . . . |
$$ | C X . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w2: = ko threat, :w4: completes threat

After :w4: there is a local score of +21.

By assumption, what each player gains by playing and completing their threat is the same, and therefore cancel out in the average, so the average value of the given position under NTE when t > 1 is the average of the value of these two politions. That value is (21 - 7)/2 = 7, 10 points better than -3. ;)

So, under NTE conditions, the average value of the corner is (7 - 5)/2 = 1, and the miai value of a play is 6.


Though I follow your calculation the conclusion does not fit with my understanding of the miai value basic concept. For me a miai value of say "6" means that each player has to play in the local area when the temperature drops under 6.


The thing is that kos typically destroy the independence of the local area of the ko and the rest of the board. The concepts of komaster and NTE are ways of taking account of the relevance of the rest of the board. With kos we cannot always rely upon the basic idea of miai values.

Miai values rely upon average territorial values. With a ko, strictly speaking there may not be an average value, and thus, no miai value in the basic sense, either. That is why Berlekamp talked about the mast values of kos.

And indeed, if NTE conditions apply, either player should play in the corner when the global temperature drops under 6. In addition, with complex kos such as this one, altering the conditions on the rest of the board is often done instead of playing in the local ko position.

And, as we have seen, with this ko the top three plays elsewhere may be considered as local. Kos destroy the independence of the board.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #904 Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:22 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
I have dubbed the ko plus other relevant regions of the board the ko ensemble.

Maybe I have goofed, but I think that the ko corner plus one humungous ko threat for Black makes Black komaster. Here is an SGF file. :)



The ko ensemble has a mast value of -1½, with each play gaining 6½ points on average.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #905 Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:53 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Bill Spight wrote:
I have dubbed the ko plus other relevant regions of the board the ko ensemble.

Maybe I have goofed, but I think that the ko corner plus one humungous ko threat for Black makes Black komaster. Here is an SGF file. :)





Oops why not the above sequence? I alaways proposed to play white tenuki in the corner just after having played my new move A17. That way white can save his group.


This post by Gérard TAILLE was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #906 Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 6:53 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Very good, thanks. :D

Here is a new SGF file. Edited for correctness.



So the mast value of the ko ensemble is -5 points and the average gain per move is 3 points. :)

Edit: As pointed out later, this calculation does not give the value of the vertical mast, which is what the unqualified term, mast value, indicates.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


Last edited by Bill Spight on Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #907 Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:44 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Bill Spight wrote:
Very good, thanks. :D

Here is a new SGF file. Edited for correctness.



So the average value of the ko ensemble is -5 points and the average gain per move is 3 points. :)


I do not understand how you count the ko variant

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | . X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X . O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | X O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Unless the temperature is very low the answer :b2: is very bad isn't it?
My feeling is that white must play in the corner as soon as she cannot afford to give up the corner. IOW I see a miai value far higher than yours and probably near from 6½. Are you sure white has better to play in the environment if temperature is between 3 and 6½ ?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #908 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:16 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Very good, thanks. :D

Here is a new SGF file. Edited for correctness.



So the average value of the ko ensemble is -5 points and the average gain per move is 3 points. :)


I do not understand how you count the ko variant

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | . X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X . O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | X O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Unless the temperature is very low the answer :b2: is very bad isn't it?


It is sente, isn't it?

To find the local territorial count you play out the sente.

If Black plays elsewhere, so that White wins the ko with more local plays than Black, we cannot find a mast value fo the ko ensemble, because then White plays as many net local plays as when White plays first. If you want to consider a Black play elsewhere at this point, it must be part of the ko ensemble.

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
My feeling is that white must play in the corner as soon as she cannot afford to give up the corner. IOW I see a miai value far higher than yours and probably near from 6½. Are you sure white has better to play in the environment if temperature is between 3 and 6½ ?


When you can read the play out you don't need theory. Both thermography and the traditional way of estimating territory and the value of plays only promise estimates and heuristics. So whenever you ask me whether I am sure that a heuristic is right, regardless of the rest of the board, I have to say no.

But looking at this corner with no ko threats, we found that the three hottest positions probably belong in the ko ensemble. Maybe in this case the two hottest positions belong in the ko ensemble. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #909 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:11 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Bill Spight wrote:
It is sente, isn't it?

To find the local territorial count you play out the sente.


I do dot understand Bill.
OC it is sente but that does not mean that you have to play it to find the territorial count.
Let's take a very simple example

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 1 X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 2 O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


After :w1: the move :b2: is sente but looks quite bad. In order to count the local territory will you assume this sente move or will you assume a ko fight?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #910 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 12:08 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
It is sente, isn't it?

To find the local territorial count you play out the sente.


I do dot understand Bill.
OC it is sente but that does not mean that you have to play it to find the territorial count.
Let's take a very simple example

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 1 X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 2 O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


After :w1: the move :b2: is sente but looks quite bad. In order to count the local territory will you assume this sente move or will you assume a ko fight?


It's a bad play at territorial scoring, because it gains nothing. {shrug} We do not play it for that reason.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 1 X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | 3 O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Result: -4 in 2 plays by White.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | 1 O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Result: +12 in 1 play by Black.

The ko has a mast value when

-4 + 2t = 12 - t, that is, when

t = 5⅓ , and the mast value, m, is

m = 6⅔

:)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #911 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:16 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
OK, let's at the simple gote, U = {u|-u}, u > 0, to the ko ensemble. U is not shown on the board.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | 1 . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O a . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b2: = u

If White plays in the ko corner, Black replies in U when u > 1. That yields a sente sequence with the result, u - 8.

If White plays first in U, then the mast value is -5 - u in gote. Playing first in U dominates when

u - 8 ≥ -5 - u , that is, when

u ≥ 1½

Next, let Black play first.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | X O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 4 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b15: = u

Note that :b11: gains 1 point at territorial go. :)

The result is u - 5 in 1 net Black play.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | X O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 4 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b11: = u

Note that :b13: gains 1 point at territorial go.

The result is u - 6 in sente.

The play in U dominates when

u - 5 ≥ u - 6 , that is, always. :cool:

Last, suppose that Black plays in U first. Then White will play in the top left corner and the result will be u - 8 in sente. Obviously, variation 2 dominates that, as well.

Now to find the mast value of the ko ensemble.

When u > 1½ the mast value of the ko ensemble happens when

u - 5 = -5 - u , that is, when

u = 0 , that is, never.

So let 1½ > u > 1. The the mast value of the ko ensemble occurs when

u - 5 = u - 8, that is, never.

Maybe I have goofed again, but it seems like adding a simple gote to the ko ensemble does not produce a mast value for it. {shrug}

Give me a while and I'll try adding two simple gote to the ko ensemble.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #912 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:48 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Before analysing your last post I give you my own analysis:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | . . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


white plays first in the corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | 1 . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b2: tenuki
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t


Black plays first in the corner and white saves his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 8 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 7 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b11: tenuki
:b13: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t


Black plays first in the corner and white gives up his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B black first, white killed
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:w6: tenuki
:w8: tenuki
:w10: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

The three scores are:
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

Obviously scoreBlackFirstKo is not good for white if t > 1.
The two other scores have to be compared:
scoreWhiteFirst = scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled <=>
-7 + t = +18 - 3t <=>
t = 6¼ and m = -¾

In the last sequence you can argue that :b9: may be omitted because black's ko threat is still available. If it is playable then
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilledBis = +18 - 2t and
scoreWhiteFirst = scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilledBis <=>
-7 + t = +18 - 2t <=>
t = 8⅓ and m = 1⅓

The miai value is probably somewhere between 6¼ and 8⅓.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #913 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:52 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Many thanks, Gérard. :)

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Before analysing your last post I give you my own analysis:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | . . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


white plays first in the corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | 1 . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b2: tenuki
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t


I think you misremembered that the average value of the top left corner is -5. The average value for the ko ensemble is -5 - 3 = -8. Result: -8 + t.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . 4 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 3 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 4 3 1 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white saves his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 8 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 7 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b11: tenuki
:b13: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t


Again, your counting seems off by 1. :scratch: White has 6 points of territory and has captured 4 stones, for -10, and Black has 1 point of territory and has captured 2 stones, for +3. Result -7 + 2t.

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white gives up his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B black first, white killed
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:w6: tenuki
:w8: tenuki
:w10: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t


Here we agree on the score. :)

The three scores are:
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Obviously scoreBlackFirstKo is not good for white if t > 1.
The two other scores have to be compared:
scoreWhiteFirst = scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled <=>
-7 + t = +18 - 3t <=>
t = 6¼ and m = -¾


That should be, I think,

countWhiteFirst = -8 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -7 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

When t > 1 then scoreBlackFirstKo is better for White than countWhiteFirst. That is, in the BlackFirstKo sequence Black has made a mistake or White has made a mistake in the countWhiteFirst sequence.

The temperature of indifference between the WhiteFirst sequence and the BlackFirstWhiteKilled sequence occurs when

-8 + t = +18 - 3t , that is, when

t = 6½.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #914 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 3:14 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Bill Spight wrote:
Many thanks, Gérard. :)

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Before analysing your last post I give you my own analysis:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | . . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


white plays first in the corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | 1 . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b2: tenuki
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t


I think you misremembered that the average value of the top left corner is -5. The average value for the ko ensemble is -5 - 3 = -8. Result: -8 + t.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . 4 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 3 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 4 3 1 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white saves his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 8 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 7 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b11: tenuki
:b13: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t


Again, your counting seems off by 1. :scratch: White has 6 points of territory and has captured 4 stones, for -10, and Black has 1 point of territory and has captured 2 stones, for +3. Result -7 + 2t.

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white gives up his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B black first, white killed
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:w6: tenuki
:w8: tenuki
:w10: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t


Here we agree on the score. :)

The three scores are:
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Obviously scoreBlackFirstKo is not good for white if t > 1.
The two other scores have to be compared:
scoreWhiteFirst = scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled <=>
-7 + t = +18 - 3t <=>
t = 6¼ and m = -¾


That should be, I think,

countWhiteFirst = -8 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -7 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

When t > 1 then scoreBlackFirstKo is better for White than countWhiteFirst. That is, in the BlackFirstKo sequence Black has made a mistake or White has made a mistake in the countWhiteFirst sequence.

The temperature of indifference between the WhiteFirst sequence and the BlackFirstWhiteKilled sequence occurs when

-8 + t = +18 - 3t , that is, when

t = 6½.


Thank you for correcting my count Bill.
with the t = 6½ conclusion I am satisfied.
As we can see the situation with a black ko threat is very different. When no black ko threat white will not play in the corner (unless temperature is very low) but with one black ko threat white must play in the corner as soon as temperature drops under t = 6½.
BTW with more than one black ko threat, black is komaster and again white must play in the corner when temperature drops under t = 6½.
Finally with only one ko threat black is "almost" komaster isn't she?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #915 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 4:20 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Many thanks, Gérard. :)

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Before analysing your last post I give you my own analysis:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | . . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


white plays first in the corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White first
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . . X X O O . |
$$ | 1 . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b2: tenuki
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t


I think you misremembered that the average value of the top left corner is -5. The average value for the ko ensemble is -5 - 3 = -8. Result: -8 + t.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . . . 4 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | 2 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 3 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . 4 3 1 X X O O . |
$$ | O . O O X X O O O |
$$ | . . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white saves his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Black first, ko
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 8 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 7 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b11: tenuki
:b13: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t


Again, your counting seems off by 1. :scratch: White has 6 points of territory and has captured 4 stones, for -10, and Black has 1 point of territory and has captured 2 stones, for +3. Result -7 + 2t.

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Black plays first in the corner and white gives up his corner:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B black first, white killed
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:w6: tenuki
:w8: tenuki
:w10: tenuki
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t


Here we agree on the score. :)

The three scores are:
scoreWhiteFirst = -7 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -8 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Obviously scoreBlackFirstKo is not good for white if t > 1.
The two other scores have to be compared:
scoreWhiteFirst = scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled <=>
-7 + t = +18 - 3t <=>
t = 6¼ and m = -¾


That should be, I think,

countWhiteFirst = -8 + t
scoreBlackFirstKo = -7 + 2t
scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +18 - 3t

When t > 1 then scoreBlackFirstKo is better for White than countWhiteFirst. That is, in the BlackFirstKo sequence Black has made a mistake or White has made a mistake in the countWhiteFirst sequence.

The temperature of indifference between the WhiteFirst sequence and the BlackFirstWhiteKilled sequence occurs when

-8 + t = +18 - 3t , that is, when

t = 6½.


Thank you for correcting my count Bill.
with the t = 6½ conclusion I am satisfied.
As we can see the situation with a black ko threat is very different. When no black ko threat white will not play in the corner (unless temperature is very low) but with one black ko threat white must play in the corner as soon as temperature drops under t = 6½.
BTW with more than one black ko threat, black is komaster and again white must play in the corner when temperature drops under t = 6½.
Finally with only one ko threat black is "almost" komaster isn't she?


I am sorry, my statement about one player or other, given the results, having made a mistake, is wrong. :oops: After :b7: Black can kill the corner without playing :b9:, so :b9: is a mistake. Black should wait until White eliminates the ko threat to play :b9:. That yields scoreBlackFirstWhiteKilled = +19 - 2t. The temperature of indifference occurs when

-8 + t = +19 - 2t , that is, when

t = 9.

When should :w6: eliminate the ko threat after :b5:? If, indeed, White's best play afterwards is the sequence in BlackFirstKo, it is when

-7 + 2t < +19 - 2t , that is, when

t < 6½.

So, given that assumption, if :w6: does not eliminate the ko threat, :b7: should not kill the corner unless t < 9, and :w6: should not eliminate the ko threat until t < 6½. Between those two temperatures Black wins the ko, even though White can prevent it, a case of tunneling. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #916 Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 5:40 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Our discussion of Gérard's last post has revealed that the question of :w6: filling the ko threat is open with a larger ko ensemble, so let me revisit it when we add a simple gote, U = {u|-u}, u > 0.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Result: +19 - u + t

There are a number of transpositions to get that result.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Result when t > 0: u - 8 + 3t

Alternate results after :b7:.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Result when t > 1: u - 7 + 2t

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 3
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | 4 O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | 6 X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Result when t > 1: u - 6 + t

OC, the best result when Black takes U and t > 1 is the first. :)

So it looks like, even with the humungous threat, we want to add 3 simple gote to the ko ensemble, U = {u|-u}, V = {v|-v}, and W = {w|-w}, u ≥ v ≥ w > 1. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #917 Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:50 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Bill Spight wrote:
Our discussion of Gérard's last post has revealed that the question of :w6: filling the ko threat is open with a larger ko ensemble, so let me revisit it when we add a simple gote, U = {u|-u}, u > 0.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Result: +19 - u + t

There are a number of transpositions to get that result.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

your move :b9: = u and the following :w10: seem to me bad moves.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X . X O X X O O . |
$$ | . X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | a O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
The point is to compare the black hane at "a" immediatly or one move later as you suggest.
Let's take the environment g1, g2, g3, ...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black begins by hane
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b3: takes g1
:b5: takes g2
:b7: takes g3
scoreHaneImmediately = -7 + g1 + g2 + g3 - g4 + g5 - g6 ...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black plays hane later
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 4 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 6 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 8 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 3 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b1: takes g1
:w2: takes g2 (the point!)
:b5: takes g3
:b7: takes g4
:b9: takes g5

scoreHanelater = -7 + g1 - g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 - g6 ...

scoreHaneImmediately - scoreHanelater = -7 + g1 + g2 + g3 - g4 + g5 - g6 ... - -7 + g1 - g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 - g6 ... = 2(g2 -g4)

You see that by delaying black hane you lose 2(g2 -g4) points.
I perfectly know that you may have g2=g4 but for a technical point of view delaying the hane looks bad and it is dominated by the immediat hane.



Bill Spight wrote:
So it looks like, even with the humungous threat, we want to add 3 simple gote to the ko ensemble, U = {u|-u}, V = {v|-v}, and W = {w|-w}, u ≥ v ≥ w > 1. :)


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


In this very simple ko, with the same arguement, why don't you want to add to the ko ensemble the simple gote U = {u|-u} ?

When your are facing a ko with a non ideal environment it is obviously a good idea to add some simple gote in order deal with such special environment. In our case why not considering simply an ideal environment? OC if you encounter a real difficulty you can always change your mind and add simple gote to the ko ensemble. Is it the case here or do you want really to study non ideal environment for this position?


This post by Gérard TAILLE was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #918 Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:07 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
Gérard TAILLE wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Our discussion of Gérard's last post has revealed that the question of :w6: filling the ko threat is open with a larger ko ensemble, so let me revisit it when we add a simple gote, U = {u|-u}, u > 0.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Result: +19 - u + t

There are a number of transpositions to get that result.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 1
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 9 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 8 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:w6: = -u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | 5 2 7 8 X X O O . |
$$ | 4 1 O O X X O O O |
$$ | 3 . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | . O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O 6 . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm10 Black first, var. 2
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 1 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 3 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 5 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 2 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]

:b9: = u

your move :b9: = u and the following :w10: seem to me bad moves.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X . X O X X O O . |
$$ | . X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X . O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | a O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
The point is to compare the black hane at "a" immediatly or one move later as you suggest.
Let's take the environment g1, g2, g3, ...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black begins by hane
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 2 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 4 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 6 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 1 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b3: takes g1
:b5: takes g2
:b7: takes g3
scoreHaneImmediately = -7 + g1 + g2 + g3 - g4 + g5 - g6 ...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black plays hane later
$$ ---------------------
$$ | X 4 X O X X O O . |
$$ | 6 X O O X X O O O |
$$ | X 8 O X X X O O O |
$$ | . O O X . X O O O |
$$ | 3 O X X . X O O O |
$$ | . X . . . X O O . |
$$ | . X . . . X X O O |
$$ | X X . . . . X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]
:b1: takes g1
:w2: takes g2 (the point!)
:b5: takes g3
:b7: takes g4
:b9: takes g5

scoreHanelater = -7 + g1 - g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 - g6 ...

scoreHaneImmediately - scoreHanelater = -7 + g1 + g2 + g3 - g4 + g5 - g6 ... - -7 + g1 - g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 - g6 ... = 2(g2 -g4)

You see that by delaying black hane you lose 2(g2 -g4) points.
I perfectly know that you may have g2=g4 but for a technical point of view delaying the hane looks bad and it is dominated by the immediat hane.


You make some good points. :) But, as I said before, we have different objectives. I am looking to evaluate the ko ensemble. Without adding any simple gote to the one with just the ko corner and the humungous threat, I already did so, and maybe that's good enough. It's a 3 point Black sente. :) (Edit: That may not be so. I have not bothered to work out the thermograph the old fashioned way. I think I better just do that. It would have saved a lot of time, but not been as interesting. :lol: ) Adding U it is surprising how many sequences lead to no mast at a non-negative temperature. I have been playing around with adding two simple gote. It is an improvement, but still not simple. Maybe it's just not a great idea. {shrug}

I started off using von Neuman game theory and an environment of simple gote, but frankly, in trying to find a mast value for the ko ensemble, I did not work anything out from that perspective. I appreciate your pointing out what can be gleaned from that approach. :)

Bill Spight wrote:
So it looks like, even with the humungous threat, we want to add 3 simple gote to the ko ensemble, U = {u|-u}, V = {v|-v}, and W = {w|-w}, u ≥ v ≥ w > 1. :)


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------
$$ | . X O X . . . . . |
$$ | X O O X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------[/go]


In this very simple ko, with the same arguement, why don't you want to add to the ko ensemble the simple gote U = {u|-u} ?[/quote]

In the late 1980s I struggled with finding the best play for what Berlekamp called hyperactive ko positions, with an environment of simple gote and simple ko threats. They are deucedly difficult. I often resorted to finite environment, adding one gote or one ko threat at a time. Even so, they quickly became intractable. Since learning CGT and Berlekamp's komaster analysis, things which were difficult became easy. I have avoided complicating things.

So I find it very interesting how, with this particular ko position, it has seemed like a good idea to add a few gote to the ko ensemble. I appreciate your insights. :bow: But in general I try to avoid complications. :) KISS = keep it simple, sister. ;)

As for the admittedly simple ko above, it is easy to evaluate without reference to any gote.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #919 Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:43 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 514
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 30
Rank: 1er dan
Yes Bill, we have to make our maximum to keep things as simple as possible.

When I analyse a position in order to discover the best moves, the miai value and the mast value, the first phase consists of finding the best sequences. Here my view is that we must make our maximum to play the technically best moves. We must avoid technically bad moves as for example a bad order of the moves. In order to reach this goal I prefer to use a rich environment ε, 2ε, 3ε, 4ε ...
That way I can see a difference between the sequences
g1 + g2 + g3 - g4 + g5 - g6 ... and g1 - g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 - g6 ... = 2(g2 -g4) = 4ε
As soon as the best sequence has been discovered then I prefer to use the usual ideal environment to give a result as simple as possible.

OC if I want to show a small particularity of the position, depending of the environment, then I can build a complete environment.

What is your own approach Bill?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: This 'n' that
Post #920 Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:33 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10902
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3364
First, to all readers, let me apologize for any crankiness and resulting errors recently. I am not well, and have not been for some time. It's not too serious, but it has affected my motivation and concentration. :(

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1057 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 53  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group