It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:42 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #1 Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:13 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Position at move 216
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . O O X . . . . . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O X O O O O . . O O X . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X X X O X O O . O X . X . X . |
$$ | O O . O c . . X X X O . O . . O X X . |
$$ | X O O . O X X . . . X X O . . O O O . |
$$ | X X O X X O . . . . X O O . . O X O . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . X O . X O X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . X X X . O X O . |
$$ | . a X . . . . . . . . . O X X X b X . |
$$ | . O X , . . . . . O . . O X . X X X . |
$$ | . O O X . . . . X . . . O X X O O X X |
$$ | . O X . X . . X . X X . X O O . O O X |
$$ | . O O X . . . O X . X . X O . O O X . |
$$ | . O X X . . . O X X O O X X O . O X X |
$$ | . . O X . . X X O O X X X . . . O X . |
$$ | . . O X O . X O O , O O O X X X X O O |
$$ | . . O O X X X O . O O . X O O O X O . |
$$ | . X O . O X X O O . . . X . . O O . . |
$$ | . O . O O O X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I'm taking this position from an AI Sensei discussion. I'd like to get anyone's idea on what's the biggest endgame move: A or B? In particular I'd like to get expert opinion on the miai values. Here's my analysis:

A is ambiguous. If considered White's sente, then Black makes 3 points by playing there. White's follow-up, if Black doesn't answer White A, is also about 3 points. So the miai value is 3/1 or 6/2 = 3.

B is gote. A White play would shift the count by 4+1/6 so the miai value is 2+1/12.

By miai value analysis A is bigger than B. But when I verify that by playing out the board, Black B seems to give a result that's 1 point better.
C plays a role: it's also ambiguous, being a 2 point move with a 2 point follow-up.

If these 3 are the only moves on the board then let's see the difference

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . O O X . . . . . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O X O O O O . . O O X . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X X X O X O O . O X . X . X . |
$$ | O O . O 3 . . X X X O . O . . O X X . |
$$ | X O O 4 O X X . . . X X O . . O O O . |
$$ | X X O X X O . . . . X O O . . O X O . |
$$ | C X X C . . . . . . . X O . X O X O . |
$$ | C C C X . . . . . . . X X X . O B O . |
$$ | . 1 X . . . . . . . . . O X X X 2 X . |
$$ | . O X , . . . . . O . . O X . X X X . |
$$ | S O O X . . . . X . . . O X X O O X X |
$$ | S O X . X . . X . X X . X O O . O O X |
$$ | . O O X . . . O X . X . X O . O O X . |
$$ | . O X X . . . O X X O O X X O . O X X |
$$ | . . O X . . X X O O X X X . . . O X . |
$$ | . . O X O . X O O , O O O X X X X O O |
$$ | . . O O X X X O . O O . X O O O X O . |
$$ | . X O . O X X O O . . . X . . O O . . |
$$ | . O . O O O X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Black recaptures at BB


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Position at move 216
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . O O X . . . . . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O X O O O O . . O O X . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X X X O X O O . O X . X . X . |
$$ | O O . O 3 . . X X X O . O . . O X X . |
$$ | X O O 5 O X X . . . X X O . . O O O . |
$$ | X X O X X O . . . . X O O . . O X O . |
$$ | . X X C . . . . . . . X O . X O X O . |
$$ | . 4 . X . . . . . . . X X X . O X O . |
$$ | . 2 X . . . . . . . . . O X X X 1 X . |
$$ | S O X , . . . . . O . . O X . X X X . |
$$ | S O O X . . . . X . . . O X X O O X X |
$$ | S O X . X . . X . X X . X O O . O O X |
$$ | . O O X . . . O X . X . X O . O O X . |
$$ | . O X X . . . O X X O O X X O . O X X |
$$ | . . O X . . X X O O X X X . . . O X . |
$$ | . . O X O . X O O , O O O X X X X O O |
$$ | . . O O X X X O . O O . X O O O X O . |
$$ | . X O . O X X O O . . . X . . O O . . |
$$ | . O . O O O X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Between these two

In situation A Black is 5 points better
In situation B White is 2 + 2/3 points better
In situation C White is 2 points better


This post by Knotwilg was liked by: dany
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #2 Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 9:50 am 
Gosei

Posts: 1733
Location: Earth
Liked others: 621
Was liked: 310
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Position at move 216
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . O O X . . . . . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O X O O O O . . O O X . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X X X O X O O . O X . X . X . |
$$ | O O . O . . . X X X O . O . . O X X . |
$$ | X O O . O X X . . . X X O . . O O O . |
$$ | X X O X X O . . . . X O O . . O X O . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . X O . X O X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . X X X . O X O . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . O X X X . X . |
$$ | . O X , . . . . . O . . O X . X X X . |
$$ | . O O X . . . . X . . . O X X O O X X |
$$ | . O X B X . . X . X X . X O O . O O X |
$$ | . O O X . . . O X . X . X O . O O X . |
$$ | . O X X . . . O X X O O X X O . O X X |
$$ | . . O X . . X X O O X X X . . . O X . |
$$ | . . O X O . X O O , O O O X X X X O O |
$$ | . . O O X X X O . O O . X O O O X O . |
$$ | . X O . O X X O O . . . X . . O O . . |
$$ | . O . O O O X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #3 Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:39 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
It's really an endgame question. Not "what's the most secure way to carry the 20+ lead into victory"

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #4 Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:28 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1733
Location: Earth
Liked others: 621
Was liked: 310
move d is not the best and not the worst of (a,b,d) :-)

a > b in my humble opinion

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #5 Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 7:29 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 111
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 12
Rank: IGS 4 dan
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Position at move 216
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . O O X . . . . . O X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O X O O O O . . O O X . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X X X O X O O . O X . X . X . |
$$ | O O . O c . . X X X O . O . . O X X . |
$$ | X O O . O X X . . . X X O . . O O O . |
$$ | X X O X X O . . . . X O O . . O X O . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . X O . X O X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . X X X . O X O . |
$$ | . a X . . . . . . . . . O X X X b X . |
$$ | . O X , . . . . . O . . O X . X X X . |
$$ | . O O X . . . . X . . . O X X O O X X |
$$ | . O X . X . . X . X X . X O O . O O X |
$$ | . O O X . . . O X . X . X O . O O X . |
$$ | . O X X . . . O X X O O X X O . O X X |
$$ | . . O X . . X X O O X X X . . . O X . |
$$ | . . O X O . X O O , O O O X X X X O O |
$$ | . . O O X X X O . O O . X O O O X O . |
$$ | . X O . O X X O O . . . X . . O O . . |
$$ | . O . O O O X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I'm taking this position from an AI Sensei discussion. I'd like to get anyone's idea on what's the biggest endgame move: A or B? In particular I'd like to get expert opinion on the miai values. Here's my analysis:



A miai value is about 2.8
B miai value is 1.92 https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList ... o199#toc16

Knotwilg wrote:
By miai value analysis A is bigger than B. But when I verify that by playing out the board, Black B seems to give a result that's 1 point better.
C plays a role: it's also ambiguous, being a 2 point move with a 2 point follow-up.


No, B is 1 point worse. White 4 move from A sequence is a mistake


This post by dany was liked by: Knotwilg
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #6 Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:58 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
OK so B is 1.92 or 1+11/12 which is well documented.
Let me then try getting to your 2.8 for A, reducing the diagram to the local position and taking a little of the complexity out (perhaps affecting the value you got)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | C X X C . .
$$ | C C C X . .
$$ | a 1 X . . .
$$ | b O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


This branch is easy: we can assume A and B as boundaries since the hanes cancel out. The net result (count) is 4.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | C X X C . .
$$ | a 2 C X . .
$$ | b 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


this is also easy for the same reason. The count is 1.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2

So we have, with value and (count)

2.25 (1.75)
/ \
1.5(-0.5) (4)
/ \
(-2)(1)

The value of A is 2.25 and the count is 1.75

Could it be that your 2.8 is a rounding of 2.75 and that you have mistakenly calculated the average between the value 1.5 and the count 4?

I think it's more likely that you are the expert and I made a mistake. Please correct!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #7 Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 3:20 pm 
Dies with sente

Posts: 111
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 12
Rank: IGS 4 dan
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2


In similar positions b > a. It is easy to verify this by constructing https://senseis.xmp.net/?DifferenceGame
So black or white play b instead of a

And in the current position white b is sente

Knotwilg wrote:
So we have, with value and (count)

2.25 (1.75)
/ \
1.5(-0.5) (4)
/ \
(-2)(1)

The value of A is 2.25 and the count is 1.75

Could it be that your 2.8 is a rounding of 2.75 and that you have mistakenly calculated the average between the value 1.5 and the count 4?

I think it's more likely that you are the expert and I made a mistake. Please correct!


I'm definitely not an expert and I don't fully understand how all this counts.

But after reading the articles https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiCountingWithTrees and https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList%2FDiscussion (especially the section "For instance, suppose that you start with this tree"), something cleared up and now I understand the calculation process better.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X . . .
$$ | . 2 . X . .
$$ | . 1 X . . .
$$ | . O X , . .
$$ | . O X . . .[/go]

After White 1, the temperature has increased. Therefore it's sente and Black has to answer 2.
So A miai value is (4+1)/2 = 2.5

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #8 Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2023 7:30 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Thanks a lot!

But still not sure: how does the temperature increase?

Let me explain the tree in words:

The count of Black first is 4
The count of White first is -0.5, because next White going first the count is -2 and Black going first the count is 1; (-2+1)/2=-0.5
Therefore the value of the second move is 1.5 (moving the count from -0.5 to either -2 or 1)

The count of the original position is (4-0.5)/2 = 1.75
Therefore the value of the first move is 2.25 (moving the count to either 4 or -0.5)

The value of the first move (2.25) is larger than the value of the second move (1.5)
So the temperature decreases and the move is gote.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #9 Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2023 9:17 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 111
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 12
Rank: IGS 4 dan
Knotwilg wrote:
But still not sure: how does the temperature increase?

Maybe we are talking about different "temperatures". Mine from https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiCountingWithTrees.
Temperature = (blackcount-Whitecount)/(blacktally-whitetally)
And calc from bottom to top.

Follow the algorithm from https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList%2FDiscussion (the section "For instance, suppose that you start with this tree").

1) build a tree of moves assuming all moves are gote
2) check that the temperature in the tree decreases from top to bottom
3) if at some node constraint 2) is violated, then the tree of moves (and values) is inconsistent and this move is sente
4) if 3) then "cut" branches and recalc values and temperatures. make the tree consistent

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #10 Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2023 3:12 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
dany wrote:
Knotwilg wrote:
But still not sure: how does the temperature increase?

Maybe we are talking about different "temperatures". Mine from https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiCountingWithTrees.
Temperature = (blackcount-Whitecount)/(blacktally-whitetally)
And calc from bottom to top.

Follow the algorithm from https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList%2FDiscussion (the section "For instance, suppose that you start with this tree").

1) build a tree of moves assuming all moves are gote
2) check that the temperature in the tree decreases from top to bottom
3) if at some node constraint 2) is violated, then the tree of moves (and values) is inconsistent and this move is sente
4) if 3) then "cut" branches and recalc values and temperatures. make the tree consistent


Hehe :) I'm under the - possibly false - belief that is exactly what I did ...

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #11 Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2023 11:35 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 757
Liked others: 114
Was liked: 916
Rank: maybe 2d
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2


I'm skeptical of this, unless this is intended to be an approximation rather than to be exactly accurate?

Playing A and B here are not independently 50-50able, because playing A may affect the liberties that determine whether B is sente atari on the whole group, and vice versa whoever plays B first affects the value of the situation at A.

Additionally, if we completely ignore black's possible liberty shortage from B and just focus on the shape at A by itself, this is not a situation where you can take the average of 3 and 2 points for white. This is because if black plays A first and white blocks, that itself is already a slight local gain and the temperature drops, leaving a remaining ko mouth where black can tenuki. (See the fifth diagram on the 0.67 section at https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList%2F000To099#toc7, "Make ko"). The value of this resulting ko mouth position has a 1/3 in it, so if you don't end up with a factor of 3 in the denominator finally after doing the full calculation, something may be off.

For an accurate evaluation of the miai value, rather than just an approximation, due to these details you may need to expand the tree out a bit further. (And in the process, determine actually what the correct first move for each side is here!)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #12 Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 3:52 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
lightvector wrote:
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2


I'm skeptical of this, unless this is intended to be an approximation rather than to be exactly accurate?

Playing A and B here are not independently 50-50able, because playing A may affect the liberties that determine whether B is sente atari on the whole group, and vice versa whoever plays B first affects the value of the situation at A.

Additionally, if we completely ignore black's possible liberty shortage from B and just focus on the shape at A by itself, this is not a situation where you can take the average of 3 and 2 points for white. This is because if black plays A first and white blocks, that itself is already a slight local gain and the temperature drops, leaving a remaining ko mouth where black can tenuki. (See the fifth diagram on the 0.67 section at https://senseis.xmp.net/?MiaiValuesList%2F000To099#toc7, "Make ko"). The value of this resulting ko mouth position has a 1/3 in it, so if you don't end up with a factor of 3 in the denominator finally after doing the full calculation, something may be off.

For an accurate evaluation of the miai value, rather than just an approximation, due to these details you may need to expand the tree out a bit further. (And in the process, determine actually what the correct first move for each side is here!)


Thanks

I gave it a try here: https://senseis.xmp.net/?BQM606

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #13 Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:53 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 211
Liked others: 16
Was liked: 62
Rank: KGS 1k EGF 2k
KGS: Schachus12
In the diagram undertitled WWBW, imo white 5 should be destroying the eye at a instead of blocking the side, which also protects the side at the same time, because of blacks damezumari. This is also the reason why imo black 4 should also be making the eye at a instead of a hane on the side)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #14 Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 7:38 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Schachus wrote:
In the diagram undertitled WWBW, imo white 5 should be destroying the eye at a instead of blocking the side, which also protects the side at the same time, because of blacks damezumari. This is also the reason why imo black 4 should also be making the eye at a instead of a hane on the side)


Thanks for spotting it. I changed accordingly.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #15 Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 7:40 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 111
Liked others: 33
Was liked: 12
Rank: IGS 4 dan
Schachus wrote:
In the diagram undertitled WWBW, imo white 5 should be destroying the eye at a instead of blocking the side, which also protects the side at the same time, because of blacks damezumari. This is also the reason why imo black 4 should also be making the eye at a instead of a hane on the side)


Yes

dany wrote:
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2


In similar positions b > a. It is easy to verify this by constructing https://senseis.xmp.net/?DifferenceGame
So black or white play b instead of a


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Endgame position and miai value analysis
Post #16 Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 12:35 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2408
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
dany wrote:
Schachus wrote:
In the diagram undertitled WWBW, imo white 5 should be destroying the eye at a instead of blocking the side, which also protects the side at the same time, because of blacks damezumari. This is also the reason why imo black 4 should also be making the eye at a instead of a hane on the side)


Yes

dany wrote:
Knotwilg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ | O O O O O .
$$ | X X O X X X
$$ | . X X C . .
$$ | a 3 b X . .
$$ | S 1 X . . .
$$ | S O X , . .
$$ | S O X . . .[/go]


Here I'm giving both 1/2 a chance to play A, so for White to make 3 points instead of 2, and also 1/2 a chance to play B, so for Black to make 1 point instead of 0. On average, the count is -2


In similar positions b > a. It is easy to verify this by constructing https://senseis.xmp.net/?DifferenceGame
So black or white play b instead of a



Indeed. I have adapted it accordingly in the page.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group