Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
After a common joseki http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=10299 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Ares89 [ Thu May 15, 2014 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | After a common joseki |
Greetings, I was recently introduced to a sequence(after joseki) to a fairly common joseki. However I have gotten mixed feedback on which sequence that can be considered better/correct. The sequence starts with move ![]() At that time I was taught that this is the correct sequence for black & white. Later I was "re-taught" that black ![]() Over to some full board positions played in a recent game, three stones handicap against 2dan EGF. I played black. Is there anything I am missing, maybe a sequence which is more common that I have missed? What is to expect and which of the two sequences looks better for black? Locally and globally? Thanks for any feedback. - Ares89 |
Author: | oca [ Thu May 15, 2014 12:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: After a common joseki |
In this variation, why not ![]() In that one, I suppose this is what we call a table shape... a good shape is it ? |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu May 15, 2014 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Ares89 wrote: I was first taught that black should not answer with Hi Ares, who taught you ? What was (were) the level(s) of the person(s) who taught you these things ?
|
Author: | Ares89 [ Thu May 15, 2014 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: After a common joseki |
EdLee wrote: Ares89 wrote: I was first taught that black should not answer with Hi Ares, who taught you ? What was (were) the level(s) of the person(s) who taught you these things ?To tell the truth, I'm not 100% sure. If I remember correctly, call me out if I'm mistaken, I do think I saw this in one of SandStorm3[AGA 5dan/KGS 4dan] lectures. The second variation I was told that Hwang In-seong[8dan EGF?] had taught in one of his lectures. Which I do not have access to. Edit: It was in SandStorm's lectures, he did not directly say that the move was bad, but the way he presented it, it seemed like that was what he was trying to express. Showing what I mean in the spoiler below: oca wrote: In this variation, why not ![]() In that one, I suppose this is what we call a table shape... a good shape is it ? Oca I believe this is the reason for why black should not play like that. |
Author: | Ares89 [ Thu May 15, 2014 2:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: After a common joseki |
After looking at more pro games it seems there are a little mistake in my diagram: Some links to similar pro games: |
Author: | Uberdude [ Sat May 24, 2014 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: After a common joseki |
You can't say hane under or nobi is correct, it depends on the position. There is also the option of hane on top. With hane under and then push up after the cut you can connect and keep the territory but white gets thickness. With nobi you get split (bad in your game) but don't fall behind in influence. How much you can profit from the fight after nobi depends on the rest of the board. As for your game, ![]() |
Author: | Bantari [ Sat May 24, 2014 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: After a common joseki |
Brings back memories. When I was starting playing Go, this way of playing was very common, happened a lot. Especially after those two joseki: and The game often went something like that: Or the admittedly less severe but still possibly playable: The idea was to mess up Black's side a little while getting outside influence in sente. Sort-of similar to Black's plan in the below diagram. But I have not seen such plays in ages, and so never really thought much about the viability. When i was playing this myself I was too weak to really evaluate, and later my ideas became a little more complex (or even convoluted, depending on who you ask.) |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |