Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
What to do http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=13671 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | dfan [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | What to do |
Here's an interesting situation from a tournament game I played on Sunday. I'm Black with a 3-stone handicap. White has just played the marked stone. How would you respond and what do you think the next few moves will be? I'll post the actual game continuation later. At the time this game was played, I was 4k and my opponent was 1k (AGA), though we both entered the tournament one rank higher ![]() |
Author: | DrStraw [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
I just glanced at it quickly without much analysis, but here was my first reaction, followed by a. I wouldn't play that in a tournament without more analysis, but I probably would in a fast online game. |
Author: | lightvector [ Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
My own thought after a little bit of staring at the position was this: Yay I got the same first four moves. Is ![]() ![]() As a bit of exposition for beginners about the first four moves in case it's not clear, the idea behind the push and cut is to get a free stone at B6 as aji to enable a later possible forcing move at "a", as in DrStraw's sequence. If white engulfs that stone with ![]() |
Author: | mongus [ Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
lightvector wrote: As a bit of exposition for beginners about the first four moves in case it's not clear, the idea behind the push and cut is to get a free stone at B6 as aji to enable a later possible forcing move at "a", as in DrStraw's sequence. If white engulfs that stone with ![]() Interesting. So essentially this works because you have a wall of three against a wall with a hole and two stones on either side? You can then get a choice of a free move at a or b. That is a pattern well worth remembering. Thanks. |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
mongus, that's the basic idea, but your diagram is a bit too general with too much open space: in your diagram if black plays b white just turns and splits and walks into the joyful fields of liberties and sunshine. So black needs something around there too. (Also b is usually near the edge of the board). See this joseki for example: http://josekipedia.com/#path:qepcodocndmc and also similar ones starting with 3-4, some pincer and then the press. |
Author: | dfan [ Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
Thanks for the replies! This makes it clear that I have something to work on. Both of you (apparently) immediately gave up on the F3/F2 stones, except perhaps as a threat, and worked on using the existing threats to stabilize the black group. I had already (incorrectly) decided the F3 stone was captured, and freaked out when White extended, unable to get out of the mindset of "I have to capture those stones!". The next few moves: |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
dfan, who do you think you diagram is good for at the end? Answer: |
Author: | dfan [ Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
Uberdude wrote: dfan, who do you think you diagram is good for at the end? I was certainly happy about it at the time, although things went a little sour a bit later. I had a different response to B3, which I thought worked (and still do), though I'd be happy to learn if it wasn't optimal. Coming up: Part III: White Fights Back If White had played at G2, I had something like this in mind, although I guess all it really does is take a few points and make half an eye. So I'm lucky he responded as he did ![]() |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Oct 15, 2016 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What to do |
A couple updates after spending a little time with Crazy Stone: 1. The position in the real game after I played at B2 (where Uberdude said that White is big trouble) is actually not so terrible for White if he sacrifices his four stones: These weaknesses cropped up in the actual game as well. 2. In my proposed followup if White had played at G2 in response to C2: I should have omitted the 5-6 pair (standard "omit the 1-2 in 1-2-3" reasoning). Since the position didn't actually come up, I'm not sure what I would have played in reality if we got here. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |