Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=15569 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Gomoto [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
Why is the marked move a very bad idea? White has to play at a instead of the marked stone at all costs. |
Author: | Gomoto [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
I thought it is good enough for black to get in move 1 (hane at the head of 3 stones). But if white plays move 8 in this variation, a critical position arises on the board. |
Author: | Gomoto [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
The next moves are forced and black has to start this sequence at once. White plays at a,b or c but black has reached a lead early in the game. Thats why the marked move was a bad idea! possible continuation: |
Author: | Gomoto [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
Additional Info: Most of the time white should play the double hane instead of a. |
Author: | EdLee [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Gomoto, Thanks. For the less experienced who may not be able to read as far, there's a nice heuristic in the early chapters of Bruce Wilcox's Contact Fights: the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() and he suggests it could be a warning for ![]() and that ![]() to decide if tenuki is wise for ![]() ( Of course, he emphasizes all these heuristics are merely guidelines, and extensive reading and global evaluation are key. ) |
Author: | Gomoto [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
The fuseki continues. This is not good for white. White should have played different Josekis. |
Author: | Gomoto [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
But be aware that black should not play the marked stone in this fuseki. This is not a good move. The better options for black are the moves a,b or c. |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
Gomoto wrote: The fuseki continues. This is not good for white. White should have played different Josekis. However, check out this KGS 9d beating a KGS 6d as white with this opening (but double black 4-4). |
Author: | Gomoto [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
If white wants to win it plays like this. This position is very good for white. (black should not follow whites plan like this) |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gomoto's Fuseki Studies Vol. 7: Early 3-3 invasion * 2 |
Gomoto wrote: The next moves are forced and black has to start this sequence at once. White plays at a,b or c but black has reached a lead early in the game. Nice shortage of liberties tesuji with 7 there. Interestingly enough, I saw AQ play Yoda Norimoto a few days ago (unfortunately game now gone from WBaduk) and AQ as white played the hane block exchange above 7 before tenukiing and allowing black the painful hane at the head of the 3 stone wall (Yoda played marked stone as extend to hoshi though instead of keep pushing). At the time I thought it might be silly bot flitting, but if it was foresight to prevent the tesuji of 7 that's impressive! (AQ made a big centre but not big enough I think, until Yoda made some really dumb misread in yose and a bunch of his stones got captured on the 1st line). |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |