Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
honsuji - zokusuji problem http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2467 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | emeraldemon [ Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | honsuji - zokusuji problem |
I've been studying the tesuji book mentioned in this thread: http://www.lifein19x19.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1503 I can't read the text, but I can usually follow the answer diagrams well enough to understand what's going on. But this problem has me stumped: Here is the supposed zokusuji: And the correct variations: I understand the throw-in makes ![]() And it seems like the whole area is basically dame anyway, how can white do anything besides this: Can someone help me see the light? |
Author: | HermanHiddema [ Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: honsuji - zokusuji problem |
Your last diagram is suboptimal for white, and is the source of your confusion, I think. White can do better, white can cut: And, because of the marked stone, the cut is sente. Try out some variations to see why the cutting stone can't be captured, and what the value of ![]() Black's goal, therefore, is to protect against the cut ![]() Simply connecting is gote, so that's not good enough. In your "honsuji 1" diagram, black has connected against the cut, and gets sente after ![]() In your "honsuji 2" diagram, the presence of ![]() |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: honsuji - zokusuji problem |
White has a honsuji himself if it is his turn. Knowing that one exists, can you find it? With that in mind, I believe the reason the throw-in at ![]() ![]() Edit: Ninja'd by herman, but I've already typed all this up, so I'll post it. |
Author: | emeraldemon [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: honsuji - zokusuji problem |
Thank you both, I completely missed white's tesuji. This makes a lot more sense now. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: honsuji - zokusuji problem |
HermanHiddema wrote: Your last diagram is suboptimal for white, and is the source of your confusion, I think. White can do better, white can cut: And, because of the marked stone, the cut is sente. Try out some variations to see why the cutting stone can't be captured, and what the value of ![]() Black's goal, therefore, is to protect against the cut ![]() Simply connecting is gote, so that's not good enough. Minor nit: At the time when this play is likely to be made, the White capture will probably be sente. But that would make this a double sente, and double sente depends on the circumstances. Theoretically, this is Black's sente. I think that, theoretically speaking, Black should play ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |