Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=8665 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | tekesta [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
I know I'm not 三段, but I just had to try this one out ![]() My answer: 1@AB, 2@AC, 3@DC, 4@CC, 5@DB, 6@DA, 7@EC I chose Black 1 @ AB since Black threatens to connect out. White plays @ AC to prevent it. Black 3 puts the 4 Whites into atari. White 4 connects. Black 5 extends to the 2nd line. White 6 @ EC is not an option due to shortage of liberties, so White plays @ DA to atari the 2 Blacks. Black 7 at EC puts 4 Whites into atari. Another answer: 1@AB, 2@AC, 3@DB, 4@DC, 5@EC, 6@DA, 7@BB, 8@CC, 9@BA White 4 @ EC will result in two White groups in atari once Black plays at DC, so White plays at DC. Double atari after Black 5. White captures @ DA. Atari on 2 White stones with Black 7. White 8 is at CC to connect. After Black 9 White group cannot atari 3 Black stones in the corner due to shortage of liberties. |
Author: | Sverre [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
tekesta wrote: My answer: 1@AB, 2@AC, 3@DC, 4@CC, 5@DB, 6@DA, 7@EC I chose Black 1 @ AB since Black threatens to connect out. White plays @ AC to prevent it. Black 3 puts the 4 Whites into atari. White 4 connects. Black 5 extends to the 2nd line. White 6 @ EC is not an option due to shortage of liberties, so White plays @ DA to atari the 2 Blacks. Black 7 at EC puts 4 Whites into atari. Another answer: 1@AB, 2@AC, 3@DB, 4@DC, 5@EC, 6@DA, 7@BB, 8@CC, 9@BA White 4 @ EC will result in two White groups in atari once Black plays at DC, so White plays at DC. Double atari after Black 5. White captures @ DA. Atari on 2 White stones with Black 7. White 8 is at CC to connect. After Black 9 White group cannot atari 3 Black stones in the corner due to shortage of liberties. I tried to translate your variations to diagrams, is this correct? If so, I think the first variation is wrong because White can sacrifice his 4 stones. How do you play after ![]() |
Author: | Shaddy [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
My attempt: |
Author: | illluck [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
Shaddy wrote: My attempt: @Shaddy: |
Author: | illluck [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
Shaddy's variation is quite valuable as that idea didn't even occur to me. Using his variation as the basis: |
Author: | tekesta [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
@Sverre: Yes, that is the problem depicted in the photo. The diagrams correctly depict the sequences I mentioned. Thank you for producing the diagrams. -------------------------------- I had a feeling that the first answer would not work since White can live by sacrificing the top 4 stones. The second answer would be closer to the correct solution, although seki is probably not the answer that the author of the problem wants. Shaddy's answer with throw-in as final move never occurred to me. Now I see why it's rated 3-dan. In any case it's fun to play around with these tsumego ![]() |
Author: | Shaddy [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: My attempt at a 3-dan problem (black to play) |
Damn, I got the order wrong. I'm really rusty, it seems.. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |