Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=14263 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Bonobo [ Sat May 27, 2017 6:32 am ] |
Post subject: | AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
First batch has been released: https://deepmind.com/research/alphago/a ... lay-games/ |
Author: | GoEye2012 [ Sat May 27, 2017 8:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
The SGF archive is also hosted at Go Eye's web site (And in Go Eye's live broadcast list) http://goeye-app.com/go-resources/ag.tar.gz |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat May 27, 2017 9:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Bonobo wrote: Thanks. ![]() But I am only able to play throught game 1. When I try to choose another, a new screen appears with game 1. {shrug} |
Author: | mhlepore [ Sat May 27, 2017 10:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Bill Spight wrote: ...But I am only able to play throught game 1. When I try to choose another, a new screen appears with game 1. {shrug} Clicking inside the Choose Game text-box activates the dropdown, and the different games populate just fine for me. (using Chrome on a Mac) |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat May 27, 2017 10:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
mhlepore wrote: Bill Spight wrote: ...But I am only able to play throught game 1. When I try to choose another, a new screen appears with game 1. {shrug} Clicking inside the Choose Game text-box activates the dropdown, and the different games populate just fine for me. (using Chrome on a Mac) Thanks. ![]() |
Author: | apetresc [ Sat May 27, 2017 10:38 am ] | |||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) | |||||||||||
For those who just want direct SGF downloads (and can't open .tar.gz's from the link above), here they are!
|
Author: | Krama [ Sun May 28, 2017 12:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
These games seem so strange. |
Author: | Baywa [ Sun May 28, 2017 1:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
It's Go Seigen and Kitani Minoru all over again! These games look experimental. I wonder if they don't come a little too early. Studying the five games of this tournament should take priority since they involve human players and might be more useful in the short run. One of the pros said he found many new motives. Let's find those motives and write them up for other pros (amateurs?) to use. Fan Hui could also be helpful (as after the Lee Sedol match) in supplying variations and winning percentages. |
Author: | pookpooi [ Sun May 28, 2017 4:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
10 more games released and black only won 3 of them. Maybe we'll see change in komi soon, as many pro already feel the same way as AlphaGo |
Author: | apetresc [ Sun May 28, 2017 6:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
For some reason, DeepMind seems to have gotten bored with the release schedule and they just posted all 50 games a few hours after posting 11-20. I've scraped them all and uploaded them here: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/apet ... lfplay.zip and as usual, here they are (11-50) below as well! |
Author: | Ophitoxaemia [ Sun May 28, 2017 10:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Amazing, thanks. Wild looking games. In the first game listed, white attaches or hanes 5 times in the first 10 of its moves. A later game involves a whole board semeai where the game continues after a 21 stone group is captured. Also, how do we uniquely refer to these games? |
Author: | vier [ Sun May 28, 2017 11:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Ophitoxaemia wrote: Also, how do we uniquely refer to these games? Google numbers them G1 up to G50. |
Author: | hydrogenpi7 [ Sun May 28, 2017 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Bonobo wrote: why did they release it early? they stated multiple times that it would be only ten a day?! |
Author: | lichigo [ Sun May 28, 2017 7:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Wouahhh already all games are available . Now I have an addiction. I want to see more games. Let's sign a petition hahaha |
Author: | hydrogenpi7 [ Sun May 28, 2017 7:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
lichigo wrote: Wouahhh already all games are available . Now I have an addiction. I want to see more games. Let's sign a petition hahaha they release all hundreds of millions that have been self played. in compressed format it wouldn't be unmanageable in size. no bigger than say the full bitcoin block chain which as of now is 250 GB |
Author: | Charlie [ Mon May 29, 2017 6:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
I wonder why these games feel so much more "bot-like" than the mostly-human feeling of the moves AlphaGo played against Ke Jie and Lee Sedol. The way that the players jump from area to area in the first game, for example, is reminiscent of the MCTS bots of yore. Without commentary, I can't seem to find any interest in these games. I'm probably too weak. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon May 29, 2017 8:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Charlie wrote: I wonder why these games feel so much more "bot-like" than the mostly-human feeling of the moves AlphaGo played against Ke Jie and Lee Sedol. The way that the players jump from area to area in the first game, for example, is reminiscent of the MCTS bots of yore. Without commentary, I can't seem to find any interest in these games. I'm probably too weak. I feel sure that we are going to get some pro commentary before long. ![]() Looking at these games, I can see why Fan Hui talked about AlphaGo's philosophy being different from that of humans. And that is true of the approach strictly in terms of (not well defined) probability of winning instead of territory (points). But human pros do not think strictly in terms of territory, either. As Takagawa said, you make territory through fighting. (You can make territory in a plodding fashion, but then you lose.) As for jumping around, that may be explained in human terms. In general, adding stones to a region reduces the local temperature (how many points a play gains there). So in general it makes sense to switch to a different region after a few plays. (OC, there are many exceptions to that. ![]() ![]() Eary in the last century Kitani and Go Seigen ushered in the New Fuseki, which stressed center play. Perhaps AlphaGo will usher in a kind of New New Fuseki, or Ultra-Modern Fuseki. Stay tuned. ![]() |
Author: | hyperpape [ Mon May 29, 2017 8:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Any chance we can put the large number of embedded sgfs behind hide tags? This page stops rendering halfway through on my iPhone, and I have a hunch that's the reason. It's slow but functional on my laptop. |
Author: | jeromie [ Mon May 29, 2017 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
Bill Spight wrote: Charlie wrote: I wonder why these games feel so much more "bot-like" than the mostly-human feeling of the moves AlphaGo played against Ke Jie and Lee Sedol. The way that the players jump from area to area in the first game, for example, is reminiscent of the MCTS bots of yore. Without commentary, I can't seem to find any interest in these games. I'm probably too weak. I feel sure that we are going to get some pro commentary before long. ![]() Looking at these games, I can see why Fan Hui talked about AlphaGo's philosophy being different from that of humans. And that is true of the approach strictly in terms of (not well defined) probability of winning instead of territory (points). But human pros do not think strictly in terms of territory, either. As Takagawa said, you make territory through fighting. (You can make territory in a plodding fashion, but then you lose.) As for jumping around, that may be explained in human terms. In general, adding stones to a region reduces the local temperature (how many points a play gains there). So in general it makes sense to switch to a different region after a few plays. (OC, there are many exceptions to that. ![]() ![]() Eary in the last century Kitani and Go Seigen ushered in the New Fuseki, which stressed center play. Perhaps AlphaGo will usher in a kind of New New Fuseki, or Ultra-Modern Fuseki. Stay tuned. ![]() In his commentary on AlphaGo-Ke Jie game 3, Ryan Li said the one proverb that AlphaGo consistently follows is, "If there is no local play that will allow you to gain an advantage, tenuki." (The wording may not be exactly correct - I can't find the line in his video right now.) Some of these games show that in the extreme. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon May 29, 2017 9:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: AlphaGo vs. AlphaGo: 50 Self-Play Games (May 2017) |
jeromie wrote: In his commentary on AlphaGo-Ke Jie game 3, Ryan Li said the one proverb that AlphaGo consistently follows is, "If there is no local play that will allow you to gain an advantage, tenuki." (The wording may not be exactly correct - I can't find the line in his video right now.) Some of these games show that in the extreme. Yes, as I discovered a few years ago, there is at least one actual proverb along those lines. One I can loosely translate as, "If you don't know where to play (locally), play somewhere else." ![]() OC, AlphaGo does not think locally. ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |