Is there any free software available that would enable more computer-generated insight, such as:

- The suggested move from a computer Go engine
- Territory predictions
- Highlight dead or alive groups
- Anything else I don’t even know I want yet

The "make fuego play the other side for half a dozen moves" could help with fights, though.

I currently use Panda to review my games as sgf files. This works well enough at a basic level, but all it is doing is presenting the raw information from the sgf: a simple board, a move tree, and the comments.

- The suggested move from a computer Go engine
- Territory predictions
- Highlight dead or alive groups

Those are bad things to want from a program to review games. There are programs how can do that, but you don't want to trust their judgement.

You may want to try to do those things yourself and write in the game file your thoughts. Something like "Here I read [A] as alive, and I think I'm ahead by about 5 points". Then post your game in the appropriate forum or upload it in the teaching ladder to verify your ideas.
I think with each of those "set your thought in writing" reviews you'd get much more strength than ten reviews with automated estimations.

I respectfully disagree with this. I do agree that you need to be cautious with those suggestions, but I've found that move suggestions from stronger computer programs can help by giving you ideas you perhaps didn't consider. But you must look at the suggested move, and read through it, and make sure you understand why it is better than your move. If you can't understand why, then it may or may not be a better move. Granted, even if you think you understand, the program *could* be wrong, but if you're considering alternative moves and thinking them through, it is a good thing. In my own games, I find that Many Faces and Zen Go (hard to get, unless you're in Japan) suggest a few moves every game that give me an "ah ha" moment.

One useful tool when reviewing your own games is to compare your moves to moves professionals might make in similar situations. Programs that do this in one way or another all use a database of professional games.

Territory estimates are also *okay* when reviewing, but count on your own first. Then look at why the computer's estimate is different (if it is). Finally, marking dead or alive groups can also be good--but again, confirm for yourself whether it is right.

I take your point, but this is mostly for fairly disposable, 9x9 games against igowin. I don't think they are worthy of a proper game review by another person, or is that the wrong way to look at it?

This is probably a long shot, but is there any software that shows a graph of a game, with each move along the x-axis and the predicted final territory up the y-axis? This would be really useful for seeing the flow of the game, and picking out the good and bad moves.

This is probably a long shot, but is there any software that shows a graph of a game, with each move along the x-axis and the predicted final territory up the y-axis? This would be really useful for seeing the flow of the game, and picking out the good and bad moves.