It is currently Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:50 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #1 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:24 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2180
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Liked others: 237
Was liked: 662
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
I very rarely have time to devote more than a few minutes to playing go. That is why I play predominantly on DGS. But once or twice a month I have an hour to spare and put up a game on KGS with time limits such as 1/10 Canadian. Early this year I was so busy I did not play at all and only logged on to preserve my account. (Not DrStraw, btw. My playing account is anonymous.) I lost the last game I played back before this break. This is causing problems.

So here is the problem. Because I have so few game it seems that every time I play a game I get a solid rank. A few days ago I had a solid 3d. But today I logged on and found I am 3d?. This has happened over and over again at whatever level I am at. I play a game, get a solid rank and a few days later it has a ? on it. The ? itself does no bother me as I long ago quit worrying about rank, but it is extremely annoying as most of my game challenges are refused on those rare occasions when I want to play. And setting up a game is even worse as it gets relegated to bottom and no one wants to accept it.

There are times when I just feel like playing a real-time game without spending age trying to find one. But this is becoming extremely annoying to me. Sorry about the rant, but I just needed to get it off my chest.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #2 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:14 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
I am in a very similar situation, and so, not surprisingly, I have had some very similar thoughts at one point, some time back.

How I overcame my frustration was to try to come up with the system which would remedy the "problem". I could not really come up with a satisfactory idea which would be less irritating for me and still uphold the overall ranking strategy of KGS... so I just realized the problem was me, my playing pattern, and as long as I don't change that it will cause me some frustration.

These days, more often than not, I just play either somewhere else, where people are not so rank-greedy, and/or within a close-knit group of friends who know me well enough and the ? by my rank (or no rank at all when it expires) doesn't bother them very much.

In your case, you can always play as DrStraw - and I bet enough people know you by that name that you will always find willing opponents regardless of what rank you are or aren't.

Other than this, I am not sure what to tell you.
Good rant, though. ;)

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #3 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:50 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2356
Location: Ireland
Liked others: 662
Was liked: 442
Universal go server handle: Boidhre
Automatch (if you could accept playing on the preset time limits) is the best away around the "?" problem. It's only if you get a "full" ? that even this option becomes limited.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #4 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 9:19 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 602
Location: Denver, CO
Liked others: 4
Was liked: 47
Rank: 1 kyu KGS
Universal go server handle: djllap
You could choose to simply "unrank" your account. I see many players on KGS that choose not to have a rank - some of them quite strong. I have never done this to my account, so I can't say that people are extremely keen to play these kind of accounts, but it doesn't hurt to try.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #5 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:20 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1515
Liked others: 111
Was liked: 317
The rating mechanism hasn't changed since you were an admin :)

_________________
North Lecale

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #6 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:34 pm 
Dies with sente

Posts: 94
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 4
Since the problem is caused by KGS calculating rank only from games played in the last 6 months, the easiest solution seems to be to play a lot of games right now to make it easier for the server to determine your rank (otherwise it has too little info to rank you). One way might be to take an afternoon/evening and play a lot of ranked blitz. Even if you are not a blitz player and lose most games, several ranked games should stabilise your rank for months and help you to solve your problem.

_________________
“Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; argument an exchange of ignorance.” ― Robert Quillen

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #7 Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 4:45 am 
Oza

Posts: 2180
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Liked others: 237
Was liked: 662
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Quote:
You could choose to simply "unrank" your account. I see many players on KGS that choose not to have a rank - some of them quite strong. I have never done this to my account, so I can't say that people are extremely keen to play these kind of accounts, but it doesn't hurt to try.

I already have one unranked account ("DrStraw"). It is impossible to get games with it because of that. This is why I have a ranked account for actual playing.

Quote:
The rating mechanism hasn't changed since you were an admin

Never said it had. It was a problem back then and still is a problem now.

Quote:
Since the problem is caused by KGS calculating rank only from games played in the last 6 months, the easiest solution seems to be to play a lot of games right now to make it easier for the server to determine your rank (otherwise it has too little info to rank you). One way might be to take an afternoon/evening and play a lot of ranked blitz. Even if you are not a blitz player and lose most games, several ranked games should stabilise your rank for months and help you to solve your problem.

I already said I don't have time to do this. And I don't like blitz anyway - it is basically a random outcome.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #8 Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 12:26 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2777
Location: Seattle, WA
Liked others: 251
Was liked: 549
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
I almost always have a ? rank but get matches on automatch fairly quickly. It doesn't bother me.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #9 Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:02 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2180
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Liked others: 237
Was liked: 662
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
oren wrote:
I almost always have a ? rank but get matches on automatch fairly quickly. It doesn't bother me.


None of the automatch time limits fit my schedule. They are all to slow for the time I have or too fast for a comfortable game.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #10 Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 4:58 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 653
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Liked others: 54
Was liked: 216
DrStraw wrote:
oren wrote:
I almost always have a ? rank but get matches on automatch fairly quickly. It doesn't bother me.


None of the automatch time limits fit my schedule. They are all to slow for the time I have or too fast for a comfortable game.


What time settings do you usually use on KGS?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #11 Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 7:12 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9550
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
I agree with Bantari - just play as DrStraw and people will play with you.

If you really can't get over the issue, just play on a different server - there are several options these days.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #12 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 1:22 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 499
Location: Germany
Liked others: 213
Was liked: 96
Rank: Fox 3D
GD Posts: 325
Just play on Tygem, your rank will stay stable there. It is also the technically superior server (which is why I prefer it over KGS).

_________________
Stay out of my territory! (W. White, aka Heisenberg)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #13 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:24 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2508
Liked others: 1304
Was liked: 1128
SpongeBob wrote:
Just play on Tygem, your rank will stay stable there. It is also the technically superior server (which is why I prefer it over KGS).


Off topic, thus hidden.
How is it technically superior, and why does that make a difference? (not challenging, just curious)

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #14 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:55 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 499
Location: Germany
Liked others: 213
Was liked: 96
Rank: Fox 3D
GD Posts: 325
Off-topic response for daal:
On KGS there is the always present problem of lagging. Not on Tygem, where your stone is placed immediately, not after a response from the server reaches you. This makes for a whole different playing experience, imo. Another aspect is byo-yomi voice- and mouse-cursor-counting.

_________________
Stay out of my territory! (W. White, aka Heisenberg)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #15 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 2:45 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Hi SpongeBob,
SpongeBob wrote:
On KGS there is the always present problem of lagging. Not on Tygem, where your stone is placed immediately, not after a response from the server reaches you. This makes for a whole different playing experience, imo.
But that's an illusion, isn't it. No server can guarantee zero lag, because there are always intermediaries -- say, your ISP crashes; or any hiccup anywhere between your client and the server half the globe away -- so the author has to make a choice: either show the new move immediately on the client side, regardless of whether the move itself has actually reached the server, or, wait for the server response, then show the move.

Some people, like you, are happy to see the immediate placement of the move on your client, even if it takes a minute or longer to receive the server response. Even if it never reaches the server in the first place.

Another choice is to wait for the server response.
In this second option, if there is indeed a lag,
you find out about it sooner, because you experience the delay.

In the first option, you see your move immediately on your client,
but if there's a minute (or, infinite) delay,
you won't notice something has happened until later (could be much later).
You prefer this option.

So the issue here is not about the lag, which can happen
any time, anywhere, beyond the control of any client
Tygem or otherwise, but people's preferences for the UI.

Another approach, which I have never seen but maybe someone has already done it:
show the move immediately on the client side, and simultaneously show the server response; and if there is any lag at all, show the lag in real time.
So if the client does not receive a server response,
then start a stopwatch and display the lag, in real time.
If/when the client finally gets the server response,
then close and reset the stopwatch.
This seems to get the best of both worlds.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #16 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:32 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
@SpongeBob:
SpongeBob wrote:
Off-topic response for daal:
On KGS there is the always present problem of lagging. Not on Tygem, where your stone is placed immediately, not after a response from the server reaches you. This makes for a whole different playing experience, imo. Another aspect is byo-yomi voice- and mouse-cursor-counting.

Not sure any of that has anything to do with being "technologically superior." To me its user/programmer preference which options you implement or not, and how.
Do you even know what technology is Tygem based on? Just curious, since I don't have a clue.
And what is KGS Server? C? C++? Java? I don't remember...
Once we know, we can discuss.

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #17 Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:16 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9550
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Somebody expressed their preferred server - and it wasn't KGS. I think we all know where this thread is headed! Take cover before the flame war ignites!

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #18 Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:44 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 28
Liked others: 7
Was liked: 41
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: calantir
You could also try OGS. Once you clear your initial provisional games, you're non-provisional for good, no matter how infrequently you play. I'd be happy to clear the provisional games for you since your rank is well established (if you're AGA 4d or so, you're probably OGS 2d). The only drawback is that it might take you a bit longer to find a game on OGS than on KGS, as the dan population is still growing.


This post by calantir was liked by: Bonobo
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re:
Post #19 Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:48 am 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 130
Location: UK, Nr. London
Liked others: 163
Was liked: 67
Rank: 3k EGF 3k KGS
EdLee wrote:
Hi SpongeBob,
SpongeBob wrote:
On KGS there is the always present problem of lagging. Not on Tygem, where your stone is placed immediately, not after a response from the server reaches you. This makes for a whole different playing experience, imo.
But that's an illusion, isn't it. No server can guarantee zero lag, because there are always intermediaries -- say, your ISP crashes; or any hiccup anywhere between your client and the server half the globe away -- so the author has to make a choice: either show the new move immediately on the client side, regardless of whether the move itself has actually reached the server, or, wait for the server response, then show the move.

Some people, like you, are happy to see the immediate placement of the move on your client, even if it takes a minute or longer to receive the server response. Even if it never reaches the server in the first place.

Another choice is to wait for the server response.
In this second option, if there is indeed a lag,
you find out about it sooner, because you experience the delay.

In the first option, you see your move immediately on your client,
but if there's a minute (or, infinite) delay,
you won't notice something has happened until later (could be much later).
You prefer this option.

So the issue here is not about the lag, which can happen
any time, anywhere, beyond the control of any client
Tygem or otherwise, but people's preferences for the UI.

Another approach, which I have never seen but maybe someone has already done it:
show the move immediately on the client side, and simultaneously show the server response; and if there is any lag at all, show the lag in real time.
So if the client does not receive a server response,
then start a stopwatch and display the lag, in real time.
If/when the client finally gets the server response,
then close and reset the stopwatch.
This seems to get the best of both worlds.


This does seem to be a UI issue. My suggestion would be to show the stone placement in the client immediately, but with a spinning line on it. Then when the confirmation is received back from the server, remove the spinning line. i.e. trying to have the best of both worlds.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Anyone else have a problem with this?
Post #20 Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 4:24 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 499
Location: Germany
Liked others: 213
Was liked: 96
Rank: Fox 3D
GD Posts: 325
Continuation off-topic discussion :-)
You are right, EdLee, to some degree this is an illusion - the signal still has to go to the server and back (latest when my oppent has played his response). But this illusion works perfectly. You just never experience any lag and can click on the last second of your byo-yomi period. I would rather avoid that on KGS ;-). Maybe their servers do have a better response time than KGS's, too.

_________________
Stay out of my territory! (W. White, aka Heisenberg)

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group