Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
#237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=10468 |
Page 5 of 8 |
Author: | tj86430 [ Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
Sorry for the long delay.
I didn't spend much time on this, but this seems natural to me. I can capture his cutting stone, my group is connected and his stones are disconnected with several cutting points. I feel that his last move was a mistake. I hope I'm not missing anything. |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
My earlier misread really hurt. I am not sure if I can recover from a mistake like that, but if I can just escape with these three stones, I may be able to swing it. |
Author: | tj86430 [ Thu Aug 21, 2014 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I'm not at all sure what his plan is. I'm yet to figure out how he intends to save any of his invading stones. Of course he may force me to have an ugly dumpling:
at L3 but it still looks like he's in trouble to me. My main goal is keep him separated from his tengen stone |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
My first instinct was this:
But then I started looking whether I could play double hane, and to my astonishment I didn’t find any reason why not. My opponent can play various ataris, but I should be able to cope with everything quite effortlessly. Let’s see. |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Tue Sep 16, 2014 10:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
Initial thoughts:
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I can't allow white to make double atari at a, so I must defend. I believe this is better than a, b or c. I have a problem with my IT infra: KGS (which I use for reading these) does no longer work on my OS/X, and I'm too lazy to figure it out or use my Windows laptop (work machine) - and since I work at a customer site, I don't want to use KGS at work time. That's my excuse for being slow and not reading these properly. It's pathetic, I know |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I feel that I must prevent his weak group connecting to his tengen stone. The options seem to be:
a) seems possible:
White has many possibilities after this. While I can't see any of them directly bad for me, I fear that the connection between and the other black groups is weakish The same applies to this :
starts to look nasty This seems to be even more inefficient:
whereas:
looks very promising I believe there is some proverb that advices against attacking by attaching:
Finally, this looks even worse than c):
Therefore:
|
Author: | DJLLAP [ Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I tried to read this, but there are so many possibilities and even more variants after each possibility that I wasn't able to reach any definitive conclusion. After a short try this one looked best. Something like this may be problematic:
Now my Q10 group starts to look slightly weakish. |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I suspect something like this:
but I should be ok (I hope). |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
Well holy crap. I completely forgot about this game and I haven't even been on the forum in ages. My humblest apologies.
Time to make some magic happen. Or resign. Whichever comes sooner. |
Author: | tj86430 [ Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
No problem.
He must have some sort of plan, but I have no clue what it is. This seems most natural. If he saves his stone:
If not, I decide when I see what he does. |
Author: | DJLLAP [ Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
There seems to be some aji here.
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
I think this is unacceptable:
However, both these look ok, I guess:
|
Author: | DJLLAP [ Fri Apr 10, 2015 1:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
Trigger
Not Trigger After this sequence, I hope to either capture A, B, or C. If I can't do any of those then this game will be over.
|
Author: | tj86430 [ Sun May 03, 2015 4:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #237 DJLLAP vs tj86430 |
Sorry for the delay. Trigger accepted
|
Page 5 of 8 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |