Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
23. dfan (4k) vs. Loons (5k) http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=173 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Loons [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | 23. dfan (4k) vs. Loons (5k) |
Hey all, I'm a 5k KGS (who's mostly only ever played medium length automatches before). Dfan is taking white no Komi as he's slightly stronger than me. We're playing closed book and NZ rules. If anyone has any pointers on diagram manipulation, they'd be much appreciated. I downloaded Drago but I have not tricked it into exporting diagrams in a here-friendly format yet. Anyway, the game!
Safe for Dfan I'm going to call this a probe, I'll post more when I see his move. That said- By playing 4-4 I am stating my interest in playing an "influence oriented" game Good luck dfan, have fun ! |
Author: | dfan [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 dfan vs Loons |
Have a good game, Loons! I've been playing on and off for about 20 years, often taking years off at a time (my main game is chess). I started playing again a couple months ago after a one-year break, and as usual I seem to have improved by a stone by not playing for a year. I'm AGA 4k, and my KGS rank recently got to 3k; who knows if it'll stay there. Move #2
Safe for Loons I don't like playing 4-4 much; some people like to take care of the corner in one move, but I always find it hard to develop from them. If Black plays in the lower right, I'll probably play a symmetrical komoku at D3. That's about the limit of my fuseki planning. You'll also probably notice soon enough that my joseki knowledge is really small, probably about as good as most 10k players. I find that I'm happier not concentrating on remembering them, and you know what they say about studying joseki and losing two stones... I plan to annotate this mostly at my level; I think that it's most interesting to see what players actually think. If anyone wants further details of any of my thoughts, let me know. |
Author: | Loons [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 dfan vs Loons |
Haha, this is too wild. I never spend time thinking about fuseki during an actual game, I'd run out of time midgame if I did that. So, I'm a bit new to this, bear with me everyone, I've got a bit carried away- anyway, follow me to realms of fantasy; All safe for Dfan, and quite interesting considering the game Part I
Warning: My fuseki is weak. By playing a hoshi, I am obligated to try and make him happy by getting moves around the x's. He is a sideways influence oriented stone. But! Obviously I can not play at them directly, because there are still corners up for grabs! (Corner>sides>middle) So, I need to try and play corner moves that make one or more x a future good move. Some thoughts; Sanrensei?
Part II: Diagonal Fuseki
So white will probably pincer (3-4 points are pincer oriented stones anyway, hey?). That`s trickier. Pincers are tricky, so I don`t feel I can foresee this very well. Part III Applying the 1-2-3 concept to Part II - if you exchange 1 and 2 to play 3, maybe you should just play 3?
If white plays c I can play b, this transposes to a situation in II that I liked. If white plays b I might take the 5-4 as a starting corner, because of a ladder dependent joseki;
NB: If he pincered directly I would tenuki to the bottom left, creating diagonal fuseki again. If he played locally again I would tenuki to the final corner. This is a result I still feel ok about (not as much as some other variation... which is why W will avoid them). Last thought; huh, I kinda lost sight of making my top right hoshi happy. He's just going to have to man up. Post last thought last thought; I realize I didn't deal with him counter-approaching my top right, which I can see him doing, but that will very much depend on how he does it. I will aim for an early tenuki. But we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. Comments and advice on my comment-making-style would be appreciated. |
Author: | Lute [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 dfan vs Loons |
Loons wrote: [go]$$Bc Comments and advice on my comment-making-style would be appreciated. Move 2 in fuseki and so much already. It should be good. I've never seen this particular move 2 kakari before. I can only imagine it's good for W as it will likely transpose into a normal parallel fuseki but W will play already knowing the direction of B first approach. This could be a sign of black playing a fearful game, trying to hard to avoid certain positions. |
Author: | Phelan [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 3:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 dfan vs Loons |
Lute wrote: I've never seen this particular move 2 kakari before. I can only imagine it's good for W as it will likely transpose into a normal parallel fuseki but W will play already knowing the direction of B first approach. This could be a sign of black playing a fearful game, trying to hard to avoid certain positions. I don't think the position itself is bad, you can think of black 3 as a fuseki probe. Depending on how dfan plays, Loons can pick the better course of action. Psychologically, I think you're right, since he dismisses the pincer too easily on Part II of his comments. I don't think a pincer would hurt him that much, since if jumped out, he would be running towards the 4-4 on the other side of the board. I don't know the josekis for pincers as well, so I may be wrong, but it seems that playing cross fuseki is better for him at this point than it is for white. |
Author: | dfan [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Safe for Loons (Interesting that we thought about the same ladder!) On my own already! I'm not sure I've encountered this before. I figure 1) taking an empty corner can't be bad, and 2) it's fine to tenuki from the upper left, since now it's just like he played 5-4 and I played the 3-4 under him, which is totally standard. I played in the lower right corner because I couldn't find a spot in the lower left that I liked. Everything seemed to give him a nice approach, or if I played D5 he could could play D3 under me and I didn't really like the symmetry (although I guess I get to make the next move). I'm sure the lower left would be fine, it just isn't in my comfort zone. Two nice things about this spot, given that I chose the lower right: 1) He doesn't have an approach that works great with his hoshi stone at Q16 (e.g., if I played at Q3, Q5 would be really nice for him). 2) It makes the ladder of the following common joseki not work:
Not a big deal, but it's something, and makes it marginally more difficult for Black to make his two current stones work together meaningfully. (Of course my two stones don't work together at all!) I tend to concentrate (too much?) on taking territory, which means I have to be on guard that my opponent isn't getting too much influence in exchange. I can see that it's going to be another one of those games... |
Author: | Loons [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Safe for Dfan (Barely; but the board is different enough now) Okay, another directional stone, also pointing to my top right. Thus a little different to my diagram. My options, once more; Take the top left as a starting corner (but no good ladder), take the open corner and see what white does, enclose the top right. Lets review those in reverse order.
![]()
![]() Alright, reviewing, I think diagrams 1 and 3 are both unsatisfactory. I think Diagram 2, with 1 at a best addresses his directional stone in the lower right. I will aim to settle top right quickly and try and develop the left side of the board (pending his moves). |
Author: | Kirby [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
dfan wrote:
On my own already! I'm not sure I've encountered this before. I figure 1) taking an empty corner can't be bad, and 2) it's fine to tenuki from the upper left, since now it's just like he played 5-4 and I played the 3-4 under him, which is totally standard. I played in the lower right corner because I couldn't find a spot in the lower left that I liked. Everything seemed to give him a nice approach, or if I played D5 he could could play D3 under me and I didn't really like the symmetry (although I guess I get to make the next move). I'm sure the lower left would be fine, it just isn't in my comfort zone. Two nice things about this spot, given that I chose the lower right: 1) He doesn't have an approach that works great with his hoshi stone at Q16 (e.g., if I played at Q3, Q5 would be really nice for him). 2) It makes the ladder of the following common joseki not work:
Not a big deal, but it's something, and makes it marginally more difficult for Black to make his two current stones work together meaningfully. (Of course my two stones don't work together at all!) I tend to concentrate (too much?) on taking territory, which means I have to be on guard that my opponent isn't getting too much influence in exchange. I can see that it's going to be another one of those games... I would prefer to take the lower left corner as white. The reason is because, if black plays in the lower left, it goes well with his approach stone:
I think that this is nice for black. |
Author: | dfan [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
I already can't stand the fact that I can't read kibitzers' comments! Please feel free to let me know when and if things have moved on enough that I can look at some earlier comments.
I'm trying not to overthink this, since neither of us is probably strong enough for these initial moves to matter a great deal as long as we're being fairly reasonable. Plus maybe by moving fast I'll intimidate my opponent! My main reasoning is: 1) Finishing a corner can't be bad. 2) If he finishes the lower left, I'll be able to play on the point of (approximate) symmetry between our two enclosures first:
This does give him a nice followup at a or so, but there's still enough time to reduce the left, plus it would let me make a perfect double wing enclosure at b. Don't be too greedy! If your opponent is making a nice framework but you're making one that's just as nice, there's no reason to be dissatisfied. |
Author: | Kirby [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
I want to play F16 next as black. Also, I felt like posting another hidden comment to add to dfan's paranoia. |
Author: | Loons [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
I am also very interested to know what people`ve thought, I can sympathize with the other Malkovichers now. Safe for Dfan He is buying this Shimari by letting me play first in three corners. I will talk quickly about some other possibilities that I have elected not to play.
So, we're at the press. Where to from here?
I respect that as he is higher rank than me and has been playing longer, playing for future fights while he has concrete territory is dangerous, but I will not back down. |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
This would be a good time to actually know some joseki! Shamefully, I am already pretty much on my own here. First of all, now it does seem urgent to respond. 1-on-1 no, 3-on-1 no, 2-on-1 yes. My recollection is that I have two main moves here locally.
Either way, I think Black can hane afterwards. He is going to make good thickness, but hey, I have two corners (and probably three, since a 3-3 invasion in the upper right is likely eventually); I just have to make sure I don't let his influence get out of hand. I chose a because it encloses the corner more securely, and in playing around with it a little on a board it seemed like it will be easier to reconstruct decent moves than with b. I expect something like
and then (since I have to try to reconstruct the joseki from scratch) I have to decide whether to reinforce my group now or play on the left side before he gets to extend from his wall. Right now I'm leaning toward the former since in a territory-oriented game I really want to minimize my weak groups, and playing on the side would both create a weakish group there and leave my corner group vulnerable. I could possibly see a continuation like this:
in which 3 is a plan I just learned from a Battousai lecture on the Chinese opening. Black has a large side but it is still vulnerable, plus I have a big side myself and have avoided fighting on his terms. But that's probably much too far to pretend to look ahead... |
Author: | Loons [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
GGRRRRRrrrr window crashed while I was tabbed into drago and I lost my post ... I'm going to start saving drafts as my posts get longish. Sorry dfan, I'm going to take a bit longer thinking of my move... I want to actually predict what you play this time! Both Safe for Dfan ...So forgive me if I seem a bit terse this post. (After I've done some writing; evidently no fear of that) I am considering two positions here, both of which are transpositions from 3-4 high approach joseki.
D is certainly tempting (approaches and enclosures are very high value...) but I feel it's contrary to my game plan (large knight's shimari to diminish a white wedge around e), and I would rather set up a Chinese-esque environment with e if I play over there (seems really good, I want to do that, but not the most urgent). An invasion is invited... But hey, getting invaded is what framework's all about, eh? C is the same as C before, but without b already in place I feel it lacks merit. My initial instinct was to try and seal white in at a, but I feel that is gote and redundant with B, which seems like a wonderful move to me and what I believe I will/would play. B starts making my hoshi happy. I realize this direction leaves my 3-4 in the woods, but he needs support less urgently than my hoshi, who is fundamentally a framework stone. I'd still like to pincer from my 3-4, distantly. I am quite familiar with 5-3 joseki which I think distant high pincers often resemble there, so I think we should be good. Part II: Looking at lute's game got me thinking about avalanches... Which brings me to another weird transposition in the top left.
White at A, a possible continuation;
Black has a group on each side, and the possibility of starting to realize profit (on top). Black's c13 group is light but perhaps heavy and will ask for further development. I'm not convinced white's corner is necessarily alive here; I will investigate this a bit further and perhaps report back. White's floating middle stones are gaining influence, but are thin/ will require fixing; this will be serendipitous to the two also weak black groups. White can not play at b as per large avalanche because of the extra black play.
The small avalanche hane now has similar issues
This move recently occured to me for white;
I /think/ the extra black move here is too good, but I'm going to take a bit of a break and then reevaluate this. |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Loons wrote: Sorry dfan, I'm going to take a bit longer thinking of my move... I want to actually predict what you play this time! No problem, and I'm glad to hear that my moves are unexpected ![]() Safe for Loons Largely just here to make Loons nervous ![]()
|
Author: | Loons [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Ok, here we go. Also, I'm going to go back and start marking comments as safe for you to read as they lose relevance.
Now safe for Dfan: The verdict of my reading;
Safe for Dfan: Where do I get my go moves? ![]() |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Safe for Loons Only move. |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
I bet you were able to successfully predict that move ![]() |
Author: | Loons [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
dfan wrote: I bet you were able to successfully predict that move ![]() Oh no, how did I overlook this ?! I look forward to how our reading coincides.
Safe for Dfan Oh, something I think I failed to convey before; I am expecting him to take c14 and allow me to capture at the top. The group I get out of this is way better than the one he does, I believe. |
Author: | dfan [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
OK, I'm going to stop and actually think about this. I've marked a couple earlier posts safe to read as well, and I'll continue to do that throughout the game. |
Author: | Kirby [ Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Malkovich #23 - dfan vs Loons |
Loons wrote: Ok, here we go. Also, I'm going to go back and start marking comments as safe for you to read as they lose relevance.
In this situation, I might prefer playing here directly as black:
The reason I like F16 in the first place is to create influence that works with the bottom left star point. My opinion is that playing directly as above achieves this more efficiently. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |