Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
#268 Gorim vs jlt http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=18506 |
Page 2 of 8 |
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | jlt [ Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | jlt [ Sun Dec 12, 2021 1:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Sun Dec 12, 2021 2:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
I wonder what are yours and other people thoughts about this position, but guess it is too early to talk about it |
Author: | jlt [ Sun Dec 12, 2021 1:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
Short answer: I don't know where to play. Long answer: I don't think one of us is significantly ahead at this point, however I need to decide in which direction I want to drive the game. Black has connected his stones, and I made a shape which is not yet alive but difficult to kill. In principle I could tenuki
and Black's moyo is looking scary. Maybe not scary for strong players but for me, yes. Another option is reduction at the border of the moyo:
This look playable but I might fight at a disadvantage due to Black's thickness at the top right. The problem is that if Black plays "a" then I fell forced to play at "b". Or maybe invade right now and live if I can?
A bit dangerous though. Or a shoulder hit?
Leaves a weak point around a. Or maybe a light reduction which is loosely connected to bottom right white group?
This feels a bit lukewarm and gives Black solid points. On the other hand, White can now tenuki and make a shimari on the bottom left. But Black may go for this:
I don't know if the fight is good or not. Hard to choose. I need to make a decision though.
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 7:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
The supreme stone cutting technique! |
Author: | jlt [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | jlt [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 8:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
Hmmm, I have second thoughts, so probably it was a mistake. Still if White gives me 5 line territory, guess it would be better for me. |
Author: | jlt [ Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
So he doesn't cut? Let's extend then. He gets territory while I am strengthening my position.
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 5:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | jlt [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 8:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
I really want to tenuki at C6 but don't want to get hane'd at the head of two stones either. |
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 8:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | jlt [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
At last I can tenuki. My central group is stable enough for now.
|
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
@Gorim: Did you consider this?
|
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: @Gorim: Did you consider this?
To be honest, that was the plan at the beginning, but I decided that maybe taking fifth line territory should be also good. Probably that wasn't true, because the wall seems really strong now, but lets say I wanted to try something different than normal (I play too much blitz games, where fighting starts real soon). |
Author: | Dokuganryu [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
|
Author: | Harleqin [ Tue Dec 14, 2021 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #268 Gorim vs jlt |
Aw. I wanted to see this ^^
|
Page 2 of 8 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |