Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=2526 |
Page 1 of 7 |
Author: | Laman [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:32 am ] |
Post subject: | 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Dusk Eagle agreed to play with me an even game. Dusk Eagle: i propose joseki dictionaries and offline analysis on a real board allowed. let me know if you disagree let start with nigiri - choose, even or odd, then Show: 6
|
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Even. *Checks* That makes me black. Have a good game Laman!
Lately, my favorite opening as black has been the double-komoku orthodox fuseki:
I find it to be a good opening to get some quick territory for me. If he doesn't approach one of my corners before move 4, I'll play like this and go into a bit more detail about how I will respond to various moves from him. |
Author: | Laman [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
have a good game
every move is good at the opening, but this is my favourite answer to black komoku - my closed side facing his opened side, preventing mini chinese, allowing tasuki (diagonal opening), looking forward to P16 kakari. i mostly expect black komoku or star in the lower right corner, which i will answer with my own komoku or star (not decided yet) in the lower left corner. i also expect early kakari from black i briefly checked Dusk Eagle's previous games, he seems to have an active, perhaps even aggresive style - it should give me a chance to launch an attack on some weak group he will eventually create. i think we will have much fun. |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
All is good so far. If he plays a 4-4 in the bottom right, I might also switch to playing ![]()
It's all very speculative at this point, so I don't want to go too deep into variations. I'll just see what he decides to play. Judging by his last game against emeraldemon, I half expect him to play 5-3 in the lower corner. |
Author: | Laman [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
i choose hoshi, because i feel that komoku would lead to a game black is more familiar with, while i prefer a star point. this allows black to play Kobayashi fuseki, but i believe i can fight Kobayashi and i can also still prevent it by answering black's kakari with a pincer if i want and i am not even sure black will play the F3 kakari to get Kobayashi, i suspect him to play D15 kakari - i have no reason to be unhappy in such case either, i could get sente to play P16 last move i would consider being black is shimari P17, which i would answer with approaching lower right corner, but i don't think black will play this way |
Author: | Perception [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Laman: Is there any particular reason you think black won't play p17? It's a pretty common opening.
I like this opening for white and I've been playing it a lot recently. |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
In my last comment I mentioned playing a high approach to his left-corner stone. I considered it, but decided I would rather play the game like this. I'll save playing that move for another day. Anyway, he most likely is going to make a high approach to my corner. If he does this, I will simply attach underneath like this:
Or, at some point he could probe my corner (this is often done after ![]()
I've seen both these openings in professional games, so I'm pretty confident that both sequences are perfectly fine ways for both of us to play. Or, if he instead approaches low, I will most definitely play a pincer. I haven't put much thought into deciding which one to use should this occur. Finally, if he decides to enclose his own corner (at ![]() ![]()
I think ![]() Edit: Of course, there are a bunch of other moves he could play, including wedging onto my side. If he does that, I plan to try to get a second shimari in the lower-right while pressuring the wedging stone(s). I'll go into more details if he wedges. |
Author: | Laman [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Perception: Perception wrote: Laman: Is there any particular reason you think black won't play p17? It's a pretty common opening. well, indeed there is no problem with b P17. i wrote that under impression i got from Dusk Eagle's games - he plays really fast and actively - many kakaris, tenukis, etc. so i think that the shimari would be too slow for him playing black, i would be ok with P17 - i like to just lay down a strong formation and then wait and see how opponent will handle it anyway, perhaps i should not have written predictions about my opponent moves from the very beginning, i can't say i would really know Dusk Eagle or his playing style perhaps he will write something about his choice with the next move or you could ask him if not, then we could see if i was correct or not EDIT: before i submitted this, Dusk Eagle played and just his move. previous paragraph still applies ![]()
my most common approach to komoku and if i recall correctly, also the most common move in this situation. there are more possible moves for black now (at least R5, Q8, R7) and i don't have much time now, so i will write more with next move |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Most of the times when I play this opening, my opponents seem to like to wedge in on the right side. However, Laman's move appears much more common in the pro games I've seen with this opening, when black has a 3-4 stone in the lower-right corner. Anyway, I have an option here of whether to pincer or attach underneath. Attaching underneath seems like a simple way of play that is just fine for me. I could pincer, but it's not really the way I set out to play. In this game, I'd rather just play like this. |
Author: | Jedo [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Just wanted to say I'm really looking forward to this game ![]() |
Author: | Laman [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
if you agree there is an article about this fuseki on senseis. i am pretty sure most played sequence in this position goes like this:
where 3 is a probe which then allows white to choose optimal continuation depending on black's answer. too bad i don't remmember the continuation - and in situations like this i usually can't find the correct move myself. but luckily there is another possiblity - to play my actual moves. there are many answers for black now, so i can't really predict how will it continue:
black can choose a to play small avalanche, b to play large avalanche or simpler moves like c or d, which would make me satisfied, giving black corner territory for a small white wall facing my hoshi Jedo: glad to hear that |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Hmm, so he decided to play the avalanche instead of what I expected. That's fine, but I had to choose between three common responses to his last move.
The first was the simple extension. I figured white would follow it up with ![]() ![]() ![]() The next possible variation is the simple connection below:
I'm not sure where he would play ![]()
I figure this much is guaranteed, after which I have to decide whether to play at 'a' or 'b'. I'll decide for certain once we get there. |
Author: | Laman [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
so black chooses the small avalanche. next few moves are again straightforward:
then black can choose from several branches. i don't have deeply knowledge of small avalanche, but i like turn-based games (if not for other reasons) because they make me study joseki and i remember them at least for some following time. one of the most common variations goes like this:
my stones would face the opposite direction than i intended at the beginning, but it is ok, as it still keeps the overall ballance - my stones face black shimari, black stones face my star, so a and b are pretty much miai (with exception that black a has better continuation than white b). i guess i will try to find something even better |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
I've actually seen a ~4k not save this stone. |
Author: | Laman [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
Dusk Eagle: you are too fast ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
![]() ![]()
|
Author: | Laman [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
hmm, i was deciding between this move and O3 (one point below), but this should be a better. one possible outcome i have already showed in Move 12, Diagram 2, another is this one:
black can deviate at least in 13 if not elsewhere. b 19 is then unpleasant, but i think ok, because black has an unsettled group in the center if i played O3, i wouldn't like this outcome:
|
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
If he had extended instead of playing the hanging connection for his last move, it would have been bad for him:
This ladder works for me.
I kill the corner like this. Anyway, I had to choose between two options for this move. Often when I'm playing a Malkovich game I reach a point where I wish I could just fork the game, as multiple sequences seem very interesting. The sequence I didn't play goes like this:
The game would probably unfold like this (most of these moves are forced, I think) and I would try to profit from playing a pincer around 'a' rather soon. The game would get complicated, but that's fine by me. However, I have a gut feeling playing like this might be slightly better:
After this, I will probably play around 'a', looking to make a very big area which will he will feel forced to reduce. It'd be interesting to know which of these variations is actually better in this situation (if either). I had actually finished this whole writeup from the perspective of playing the other sequence, but I decided against it before posting. If you're reading this, feel free to post how you would play (either one of these two variations or something else entirely). It doesn't really matter how strong you are, it'd still be interesting to read what others think about this position once the game is done. |
Author: | Laman [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
no choice here |
Author: | Dusk Eagle [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 84. Laman (1d) vs. Dusk Eagle (1d) |
I normally don't like triggers, but I assume you will want to save these stones ![]() |
Page 1 of 7 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |