Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
127. ez4u vs topazg http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=4126 |
Page 1 of 11 |
Author: | topazg [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:58 am ] |
Post subject: | 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Ok, nigiri Pick even or odd Dave, and open up the box - if you're right, I can't remember if you're Black or get to pick your colour (I thought it was black but recently, someone picked), but if you're wrong, I'll take Black and we can get the game under way either way ![]() Have a great game! To observers: |
Author: | perceval [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
good game to both, all those high level are exciting ![]() |
Author: | cdybeijing [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
So, 6 dan vs 1-2 dan even? |
Author: | topazg [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
cdybeijing wrote: So, 6 dan vs 1-2 dan even? Looks that way, although Dave is very modest about his rank, so I'm surely he'll claim otherwise ![]() I suspect he's about 2-3 stones stronger than me. However, I'm hoping that make it more instructional rather than less, as it might be interesting to watch the gap develop rather than the handicap disappear - am I the only one that finds even games, even between different strength players, more instructional than handicap games ? |
Author: | ez4u [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
I picked even, so it is all yours Graham! @cdybeijing: we all know how the net is full of sandbaggers ![]() |
Author: | cdybeijing [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
topazg wrote: cdybeijing wrote: So, 6 dan vs 1-2 dan even? Looks that way, although Dave is very modest about his rank, so I'm surely he'll claim otherwise ![]() I suspect he's about 2-3 stones stronger than me. However, I'm hoping that make it more instructional rather than less, as it might be interesting to watch the gap develop rather than the handicap disappear - am I the only one that finds even games, even between different strength players, more instructional than handicap games ? No, even games are very instructional for teaching purposes. But, I would generally think that if a game was being played for the said purpose of being a teaching game, one wouldn't want it to take weeks or months to complete. Hypothetically in a teaching game between players of approximately 4 ranks difference, I would expect the teaching portion to encompass mainly the opening and early middlegame. If the same two players played a game with say a 2 stone handicap, the teaching portion might include a very instructive endgame. Different handicaps for different purposes. Just to be clear, I think this will be a very interesting game nonetheless and I'm not trying to suggest that there is really 4 stones between topazg and ez4u. I have never met either player, I just hope to learn as much as I can. |
Author: | cdybeijing [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
ez4u wrote: I picked even, so it is all yours Graham! @cdybeijing: we all know how the net is full of sandbaggers ![]() Yeah, I didn't notice that your rank says 6 dan Japanese. That's probably about 2 dan Chinese anyway, so even game seems in order. ![]() |
Author: | topazg [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
cdybeijing wrote: No, even games are very instructional for teaching purposes. But, I would generally think that if a game was being played for the said purpose of being a teaching game, one wouldn't want it to take weeks or months to complete. Hypothetically in a teaching game between players of approximately 4 ranks difference, I would expect the teaching portion to encompass mainly the opening and early middlegame. If the same two players played a game with say a 2 stone handicap, the teaching portion might include a very instructive endgame. Different handicaps for different purposes. Just to be clear, I think this will be a very interesting game nonetheless and I'm not trying to suggest that there is really 4 stones between topazg and ez4u. I have never met either player, I just hope to learn as much as I can. I guess I always saw these games as supposed to be instructional for observers, so I figured it would make better forum fodder even if I end up being Dave fodder ![]() Have a great game Dave ![]() |
Author: | ez4u [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
You too Graham ![]() |
Author: | Kirby [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
@ez4u: |
Author: | topazg [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Author: | Chew Terr [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Thank you both very much for playing this game. I highly respect both of your play, so I am looking forwards to this a lot. |
Author: | ez4u [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Kirby wrote: @ez4u: |
Author: | Kirby [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
@ez4u: |
Author: | ez4u [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Graham: We did not discuss whether our comments are open to each other or not. So far I have not been looking at yours because I wasn't sure how this works, but I am easy with handling it either way. |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Kirby, ez4u: |
Author: | topazg [ Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
I wasn't planning on reading yours Dave, and I'm not sure you'll benefit a great deal from reading mine ![]() It's up to you, I'm not too fussed - I think the observers may get better material if we are thinking less about what to give away (or not) to our opponent. |
Author: | ez4u [ Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
OK, we'll make it closed comment. |
Author: | topazg [ Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 127. ez4u vs topazg |
Author: | EdLee [ Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:56 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Page 1 of 11 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |