Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
??. mic (9k) vs. Chew Terr (6k) (Open) http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=511 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | mic [ Wed May 12, 2010 1:57 am ] |
Post subject: | ??. mic (9k) vs. Chew Terr (6k) (Open) |
Hello, this will be an open Malkovich game between Chew Terr and me, suggested by topazg. Open does mean that we both can read all comments of other posters (and of course from the other one). Chew Terr, I wish you a lot of fun. I'm quite curious how this will work. Cheers, Mic |
Author: | topazg [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Good luck both ![]() |
Author: | Solomon [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
It will be very bizarre to see Black lose with 2 stones under such circumstances. |
Author: | topazg [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Araban wrote: It will be very bizarre to see Black lose with 2 stones under such circumstances. I'm not so sure - as long as people aren't saying "X should play here next" it doesn't have as much of an impact as you'd think. I play a lot of similar games as teaching games on DGS, and it tends to knock about 30 or 40 percent off the rank difference. Besides, 2 stones is not so much at 7k to 9k even for two players of the same grade ![]() |
Author: | Solomon [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
topazg wrote: Araban wrote: It will be very bizarre to see Black lose with 2 stones under such circumstances. I'm not so sure - as long as people aren't saying "X should play here next" it doesn't have as much of an impact as you'd think. I play a lot of similar games as teaching games on DGS, and it tends to knock about 30 or 40 percent off the rank difference. Besides, 2 stones is not so much at 7k to 9k even for two players of the same grade ![]() Touché, I forgot to take into consideration the player ranks and that comments don't have to be novels containing every detailed variation inside the players' minds ![]() ![]() |
Author: | mic [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Araban wrote: It will be very bizarre to see Black lose with 2 stones under such circumstances. That does not put any pressure on me ![]() |
Author: | mic [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Araban wrote: I'd say W's chances are maximized if he writes as succinctly as some other particular Malkovich player and stronger players don't offer too much guidance for B ![]() For Chew Terr and me it's not so much about winning or loosing but more about the process. So hopefully he will write insightful comments as I will try to do, too ![]() - Mic |
Author: | Solomon [ Wed May 12, 2010 2:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
mic wrote: Araban wrote: I'd say W's chances are maximized if he writes as succinctly as some other particular Malkovich player and stronger players don't offer too much guidance for B ![]() For Chew Terr and me it's not so much about winning or loosing but more about the process. So hopefully he will write insightful comments as I will try to do, too ![]() - Mic Hehe I was just joking ![]() |
Author: | Chew Terr [ Wed May 12, 2010 7:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Top of the morning! Thanks for setting up the board, Mic. To be honest, I expect that I will lose, but I may be able to pull something nasty, so we'll see. Read on: Observers and mic, feel free to question or comment on any of this. As an aside, if mic thrashes me soundly, I intend to take it as a compliment to my comments and explanations (in addition to MHO's skill). I am quite interested in this as a learning format. |
Author: | mic [ Wed May 12, 2010 9:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Hello, first a technical question: If I can/should read your comments, too, what's the point in hiding them using the hide-tags? Or am I missing something? Quote: As an aside, if mic thrashes me soundly, I intend to take it as a compliment to my comments and explanations (in addition to MHO's skill). I am quite interested in this as a learning format. Me too. I'm really curios how my playing style changes when I can look into my opponent's mind. What's a MHO? My normal 4-3 opening. Nothing spectacular to say about this. If White approaches (which he probably will, because it is the last big point of the corners) I'll pincer; unfortunatly, I really don't like pincers, that's why I am going to play them much more (thanks, topazg ![]() |
Author: | Chew Terr [ Wed May 12, 2010 9:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
MHO = (correct me if I'm wrong) My honorable opponent. I think I'm remembering it right. Just an amusing abbreviation I learned from Sol and Joaz's Malkovich game. I'm going to keep putting any long analysis into hide tags, just to keep the posts smaller and more organized. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Wed May 12, 2010 10:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Chew Terr wrote: Top of the morning! Thanks for setting up the board, Mic. To be honest, I expect that I will lose, but I may be able to pull something nasty, so we'll see. Read on: Observers and mic, feel free to question or comment on any of this. As an aside, if mic thrashes me soundly, I intend to take it as a compliment to my comments and explanations (in addition to MHO's skill). I am quite interested in this as a learning format. Approaching one of the Black corners at move 1 is, OC, OK. ![]() For instance, Black might make a knight's reply and then White can play ![]() Here is an ancient 2 stone game where White approached the Black corner first. The opening is rather interesting, I think. ![]() |
Author: | mic [ Wed May 12, 2010 10:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Hiding comments to keep post short is a good idea. |
Author: | Chew Terr [ Wed May 12, 2010 12:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Mic, you chose my personal favorite pincer. I had expected a closer one because it's what I'm used to seeing, but this one's a bit more stable and works well with your bottom stone. Also, mic: your hidden diagram has stones marked 1-2-3. However, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Edit: Bill: That game gets complicated quick. Scary =) |
Author: | mic [ Fri May 14, 2010 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Hello, |
Author: | topazg [ Fri May 14, 2010 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
I'm pretty sure you can extend quite happily: This looks very joseki to me - I'd be happy enough with this as Black. However, as you say, if you push, you must cut: This is a joseki when the marked Black stone is at "a", but like this, I have no idea if it loses the merit that makes it joseki normally. Knowing how some of the insidiously complicated squeezes turn out, I would suspect it does, but it takes off the urgency Black has to defend when his stone is at "a". Certainly, this will go off joseki and very complicated quite quickly I would have thought ![]() |
Author: | mic [ Fri May 14, 2010 2:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
topazg wrote: Problem is, that I had the cut at F17 open and eventually have to play B17. Some variations I read out when White plays there make it complicated (even though I did not read as deep as you). Quote: Certainly, this will go off joseki and very complicated quite quickly I would have thought ![]() It seems that all variations in this game get rather complicated ... probably is a general property of Go ![]() - Mic |
Author: | topazg [ Fri May 14, 2010 2:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
As long as Black blocks at "a" and doesn't extend again, White loses this race. Because of this, Black can connect at "13" safely, and just has to remember there's some aji left. If this was bad for Black, the answer is to play "9" at "10" and jump ahead on the next move ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Fri May 14, 2010 6:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
topazg wrote: This is a joseki when the marked Black stone is at "a", but like this, I have no idea if it loses the merit that makes it joseki normally. Knowing how some of the insidiously complicated squeezes turn out, I would suspect it does, but it takes off the urgency Black has to defend when his stone is at "a". Certainly, this will go off joseki and very complicated quite quickly I would have thought ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | topazg [ Fri May 14, 2010 6:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: (Open) Malkovich Game: mic vs. Chew Terr |
Yeah, I figured White wouldn't play that with Black's stone moved away, forcing himself through the gap like that isn't necessary now, but I was trying not to say until they'd played out My White 10: |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |