This move is a bit of a gamble on my part. If I attacked from the outside right away, White would build a wall facing the bottom--which has more open space than does the left side--and live relatively easily from there.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O .
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . O . X O
$$ | . 5 . . . . . . . . O X
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . X X .
$$ | . . 3 O . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . X 2 . . . 6 X . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ -------------------------[/go]
With this in mind, my hope is to force White to try to live (or run) along the left side. Essentially, I am gambling that EdLee will next respond at
or "a," upon which I can attack from the outside more severely. A significant advantage to forcing White to try to live on the left side is that I can hope to more easily generate an attack against the lone White stone on the left side.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O .
$$ | . . . . . . 3 . O . X O
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X .
$$ | . . . O 2 a . . . , . .
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . X . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ -------------------------[/go]
The problem with my move, though, is that White does not need the invasion to live. Instead, White may use the invasion to reduce Black's moyo in sente while building his own large territory in the middle. White could play something like this, for instance:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . O . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . O , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 7 . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 2 . . 5 . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 6 . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]
White's profit in the center would leave White with a hefty lead.
As a parenthetical remark, I'd like to note how different chess and Go are when it comes to defending worse positions. In chess, the best strategy is usually to go into "deep defense" mode (by building a fortress, for example). In Go, such a patient approach is rarely the appropriate choice (unless, of course, one plays the endgame as well as Lee Changho does). I quite like the "deep defense" approach of chess, but Go's active-initiation-of-complications-when-worse strategy is quite exciting, too.