Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
196: Kirby vs. mw42 http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=7421 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | Kirby [ Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
I feel I have few options, so this is: 1.) an easy decision. I scratched out number #2, above, because what's past is past. I only have the present board position in front of me. Given that mindset, I considered a few things in making this move. First of all, playing away from my two stones is not an option. For example:
Clearly, black is at a disadvantage here. Locally, it's basically a disaster for black. So I considered helping out the stones in a way that took away his liberties:
But I don't like this scenario:
So, I played the other "normal" local move I could think of. Let's see what develops. |
Author: | mw42 [ Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
I often wonder what my opponent says during straightforward exchanges. I'm more tempted to peak at those comments then the ones made during fighting.
Testing Kirby's resolve to maintain his "only-on-Wednesdays" rule. |
Author: | Kirby [ Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Now it's ok, I think. |
Author: | mw42 [ Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
|
Author: | Kirby [ Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Dude... This sucks. |
Author: | mw42 [ Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
|
Author: | Kirby [ Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Sorry, I didn't see that you had moved.
|
Author: | mw42 [ Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Playing atari at (a) or (b) doesn't seem like a good idea as it pushes black into one my groups giving him good continuation moves against it. I feel it is important to help my three stones on the right as they have less shape then the bottom one. Naturally (c) is the shape move, but it feels slow, so I think is a good compromise between safety and speed. |
Author: | Kirby [ Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
I've gotta admit, this is not my style of playing. Seems really passive to me. Normally, I'd naturally play something like this:
Or maybe this:
But I've gotta deviate from that. If I try to quantify the difference in position, I'd say that white is about 15 points ahead right now. Maybe a little more. He's got influence up the wazoo, my cutting stone is pretty useless here, and if things go at this rate, I'll be resigning quickly. So I need something to kind of counter his influence. I'm maybe 20 points behind, but I've gotta stay calm. I want to play a move with influence. I want to wait for him to make a mistake. I already feel sour about this. It's no fun being 30 points behind. But if I go in aggressively and try to get more points, he could easily increase his lead. He has influence, so he could turn his advantage into real, irreversible profit. So I must be calm. Hopefully he makes a mistake. If we play several more moves, he'll make a mistake, right? I hope I can catch it. |
Author: | The Intrepid [ Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Kirby wrote: ... I'd say that white is about 15 points ahead right now. Maybe a little more ... I'm maybe 20 points behind, but I've gotta stay calm ... I already feel sour about this. It's no fun being 30 points behind. Kirby's position is getting worse by the minute! |
Author: | mw42 [ Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
W(abc) seems playable as it's similar to the chinese variation with a stone at , but I felt like this would probably be following black's plan and rejected it. Now, I imagine black will slide at (a). His shape will be a bit thin. |
Author: | Kirby [ Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 196: Kirby vs. mw42 |
Interesting move by mw42. I really don't know how to respond. As such, this post is kind of useless. I thought I'd indicate that I'd seen the move, at least, however. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |