Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
#231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=9917 |
Page 6 of 16 |
Author: | EdLee [ Tue Aug 05, 2014 6:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Bill, Instead of trying to cap and split W: Bill Spight wrote:
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
and plant B stones facing the top ? |
Author: | EdLee [ Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: the theory is simple for me: I should push his heavy eyeless stones toward my wall, ( Emphasis added. )and make territory while attacking. ( For beginners. ) In JB's diagrams in post 99, he is not making territory. Not directly, anyway. He is expanding his top moyo via his attack. The moyo is not cash. Not yet. His hope is that in the future, his moyo will somehow result in more cash for him. This distinction is subtle, but important. Joaz Banbeck wrote:
more influence, a bigger moyo, strengthening a weak group, connecting back to our friends, cutting off an enemy group, reducing an enemy moyo, etc. We can consider these as profit for the attacker. (Of course, if an attack fails, the attacker may suffer a loss, too. ) In JB's variations, the profit is a bigger moyo for B, not direct cash. Whether or not B can use his bigger moyo to bring in more cash later depends on how B uses his moyo. If B fails to use his moyo well, he may not end up with more cash from his attack. If B uses his moyo well, he may. When we discuss attack and defense, especially with beginners, it's important to make this distinction. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Aug 05, 2014 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
Hi, Ed. Since Joaz posted before I did, I edited my post to comment on his . In brief, he is not driving the White stones towards the Black wall, but towards the White position on the right side, where they can help build a White moyo. However, Black is building his own moyo, so it's not a crazy plan. |
Author: | drmwc [ Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
I was supposed to spend the weekend scuba diving with seals in Scotland, but Hurricane Bertha has blown it out. Joaz' move is a reasonable idea. My reply is multi-prurpose: 1) Indirectly strengthen my group 2) Stop Black connecting, which would be a lot of territory for him 3) Give me some nice pushes later on to make Black more over-concentrated and increase my thickness. For example, suppose black plays as shown:
44 here strneghtens black and tries to take some terrtiroy whilst attacking. So it's not a ridiculous move. But then I can bodge up my grooup in sente and take the big point at the top. I think this is a reasonably sound approach to ultilising my thickness - ignoring it and using it to justify that my group on the other side of the board is strong. I have a little aji left in the diagram too:
This sequence mya become viable. At the moment, Black doesn't need to answer 1 at 2, so it doesn't yet work. But it may work eventually. Joaz can also side-step this issue by playing slightly more crudely earlier:
The 46-47 exchange isn't obviously good for black (although it may not be bad). I ssem to pick up an endgame move at a, although the cut at b is potential niggle. Which means maybe I shouldn't play the knight's move, I should push:
This line in certainly possible. I still get endgame at a, and the push at b mighjt become fun. cutting at c could also be entertaining. I don't think my group is weak. |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
How about...
|
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
drmwc wrote:
- Is there a more severe counter than ( that ends in sente for B ) ? - Is overplay ? |
Author: | Uberdude [ Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
Ignoring the urgency of defending the centre stones, on the top side 47 is if anything an underplay for a handicap game to me in that it makes it rather easy for black to find good moves:
Both 48 and 50 make some nice territory and strength and aren't hard for a ~1d like Joaz to find (though maybe white would play 49 as 2-4 or something more exotic). Instead I would be tempted to try to start at a, aiming to not allow black such a large top right territory and sabaki in sente somehow to then take the top left 3-3 at b. Yes it's a bit of a greedy dream, but this kind of thing tends to work in handicap games. Then again after the lower side disaster white is catching up nicely so perhaps can take the more relaxed wedge in the middle. That does also settle more easily to avoid any splitting attacks with the centre group in the future. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
Make fist before striking. I know that I told the gallery that I would lean on him with a keima, but after playing out many scenarios, I have realized that his last move makes D8 too strong for him. When he does, I can't even hane. This also makes a bit of territory, and makes the eventual leaning/capping attack even stronger. The perceptive observer may note the word 'cap' has seeped in to the discourse. That is because I am still thinking - as mentioned a week or so back - that I would like to neutralize his strength on the right. I may allow him to escape to the north if I can get a few stones in the center in sente. Furthermore, I might even be able to sneak up on him if he is not paying attention. My stone at O8 has some aji. I'm thinking of something like this:
And as a further fantasy: if I can make that cut hold, even S12 becomes a threat. |
Author: | EdLee [ Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: Make fist before striking. I don't think that describes .Seems -- wrong direction, slow, and over concentrated ? |
Author: | drmwc [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
I am leaning towards this move:
I think my three stones are relatively strong. Note that they have the following resource available:
I'm not too keen on this sequence for me, since it gives me terrible shape. But the message is that I have easy access to the centre, so finding an effective attack for black is difficult. Following my approach move, if black pincers I can nab some territory:
I've bodeged the diagram to put on a possible continuation beyond move 10. Next I can choose an invasion point on the upper side (a, b, c etc.) The move at d is big but is a bit slow. Alternatviely, I could double approach in reply to the pincer:
This looks reasonably fun - it will generate some confusion, which typically favours white in a handicap game. Black may look for other moves:
The iron pillar move is sensible for black. Following it, I could try to expand on the upper side as much as possible. The move at a and b are miai for me next - if black prevents one, I get the other. Another idea is a two space extension, and if blac blocks invade the LHS.
Finally, black could play a 1 point jump or knight's move.
I could contemplate a plain sequence like the one above in reply. (Or course, black may diverge by pincering or attaching at move 4.) The drawbck with this sequence is that I''m behind and there are no immediate fights for me to dive into. I'd like to invade at a, but I may be becoming a little thin for this. SO I woulkd probably llok to avoid this ultra-calm line.
This may be more fun. The three point is big, so if black protect I get to scoop a bit out of his top right group. Alternatively, I could go in at the 3-3 immiediately. This is currently quite fashionable in pro games. It's closed book, so I can't look up those games. |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
drmwc wrote: Note that they have the following resource available: Only if B cooperates ?
|
Author: | drmwc [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
As discussed - I decided it was the most fun move here. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
He has a heavy three-stone group pincered against a solid group of mine, and he starts another group?? This can't be theoretically sound. He must be trying to complicate. I'll be happy to oblige him. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
I'm keeping my groups strong. If he wants to complicate things, he'll have to do it with weak groups. |
Author: | drmwc [ Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
AS planned. Next the following moves are miai:
If I invade at the 3-3 immediately, black can just play solidly and I think it's no good for me:
I can't find a good invasion at the top: 9 as shown gets 10, and black is thick with lots of territory. Or I could do this:
Black will make territory whilst attacking. Another idea I rejected is this:
This feels a little too simple - black's moves are natural and take territory whilst attacking. Next a doubela attack is likely aginst my top group and my LHS group, which I'm no keen on. I could stengthen either group with the next move, but I'm not in brilliant shape territorially so this isn't clearly good. One other idea is to overplay a bit:
The aim here is to settle my RHS bit in sente, and then play a, b or c to look after the other bit. But it may be a little too energetic. So the move as played is my favourite ot the avialable options. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
For observers: There are three options: push from the left, push from the right, or split him. ( Actually, tenuki is a fourth, but the temperature is just too high along the top. ) My current thinking is that my upper right group has no future toward the right side and very little in the center. Thus, if it is going to mean anything, it will have to be used to make territory. So a move like 48 below is my current top candidate.
Not only does it secure 15 or 20 points in the upper right, but it threatens to invade at 'a'. This seems to leave white in an unpleasant situation. First, he is behind on territory: I have 15 solid points in the lower left side. I have 15 to 20 in the upper right. I have 20+ in the lower right. That is minimum 50 points, maybe 60ish. And I'm going to get a few more in the upper left. He has about 15 in the lower left, and maybe 15 on the right side - but the right side is hard to measure. So at best he has 30 solid points. If he plays very greedily on the top, he might get another 15. But he would have to end in gote. Second, he has at least one weak group, maybe two if he plays too riskily on the top. I have no weak groups. ( If he finishes in gote up top, his three stones on the left are sitting ducks. ) |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
This still looks best. He has to complicate soon if he wants to catch up, and this - with all my groups safe - is the most difficult position for him to do so. |
Author: | drmwc [ Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
I have a few options. First move
This gives me very good shape. Being solid helps the 3 stones at the top. I still have vague ambitions for a cntreal moyo. However, I'm clearly behind. Rough count (on a slightly optimistic basis, since future gains are likely): W: 10 point top, 10-25 points RHS (including a moyo allowance in the upper estimate), 15-20 points lower side, total 35-55 points. B: 15-20 points upper RHS, 5-15 points upp left, 15 point lower right, 15-20 points lower left. Total 45-70 points. But there are clearly chances just through efficient large end-game moves. For example:
If this happens, white's RHS group is closer to the 20 point estimate; the 10 point top group estimate may be low; and black's upper RHS is closer to the 15 point estimate. So some slight black passivity gets me into the game, so this approach is very viable. I need to consider the impact of black counter-attack:
White gets more territroy than the previous variation. However, black is very thick and can easily alos get more territroy. White's moyo potential is woth less heree. So this may be playable for white, although again white is behind and has a lot of work to do. Second move
I am less keen on this line due to amount of territory black amasses. Third move
I rejected a line very similar to thi in an earlier comment (with a different move order.) I still don't like the amount of thickness black makes here - my next move is very difficult. Of course, black may choose a compromsie e.g. playing 3 at a, which if realitvely good for white. However, I prefer to plan handicap games on the basis of best response from my opponent. And finally...
I can contemplate hane. Then if black resistes there are two lines to consider - going for the corner or going for the outside. I've shown the ouside line here, and it looks reasonably fun for white. My moyo look good; my three stones are definitely strong. So black may need a less trong line e.g.
The question is for me is how this compares to the very first line - the weakness at a is irritating, for example. But if I get b in, the whole black group may become weak. So my choice is between option 1) lines and option 4) lines. I am currently undecided. |
Author: | drmwc [ Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
|
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck |
This is the current candidate:
But it can get really complicated. So I may take a few days to analyze. |
Page 6 of 16 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |