Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
WBaduk common pattern http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12461 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | siowy [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:44 am ] |
Post subject: | WBaduk common pattern |
Hi all. I have been playing more wbaduk in the korean servers. I'm about 4k on kgs but about 12k on wbaduk. They often do these following noseki which I don't know the best way of punishing. Looking for advice on the best to punish each of these. Thanks very much in advance! I'm not sure what is the right continuation after a. I normally try a. I usually follow with a, but I'm not sure if I should try b or something else. I normally answer with a or b but I'm not sure if there are better options or if I'm doing the right continuation. I'm not sure whether to reply ![]() ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi siowy, One variation: |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Hi siowy, Early in the opening, ![]() ( Joseki is ![]() ![]() Your reply is OK, too: After all that, B still needs an extension, otherwise if W pincers around (a) direction, the entire B group is not settled. |
Author: | siowy [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Thanks! I will remember that reply for scenario 1. Looks good! For scenario 4, I guess I shouldn't fear ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi siowy, You have to be prepared if W wants to fight: But W first has to make a dumpling shape. |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi siowy, |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
My feeling: If anything, White has the edge. ![]() Look at ![]() |
Author: | siowy [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Bill Spight wrote: My feeling: Look at ![]() Thanks! Any ideas for scenarios 2 and 3? ![]() |
Author: | skydyr [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
For scenario two, A is fine. For scenario 3, either A or B seem fine to me. B should be played with an aim at central influence, not points on the side, since white is undercutting it. A is more active and may start a fight, but helps black keep white confined to the corner and makes white's 2nd line move look not so good. Honestly, though, by playing on the 2nd line white's move kind of punishes itself. You could even consider treating A and B as miai and playing elsewhere, if it's big enough. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Scenario 2 is easy. The extension to "a" is fine. White's thinness in the corner can be exploited in various ways, but there is no hurry. If White wastes a move to secure the corner, you can say thank you. ![]() I am leery of playing at "a" now because of the possibility that White can make ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | siowy [ Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Thanks for all the super helpful replies! I didn't expect to get answers so fast! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | zac [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WBaduk common pattern |
Another possibility + variation for scenario 4. With thanks to Guo Juan/internetgoschool.com I've noticed these are fairly common on Tygem, too. As well as this; |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |