Life In 19x19
http://www.lifein19x19.com/

I was leading with a lot or not?
http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12714
Page 1 of 1

Author:  otenki [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  I was leading with a lot or not?

Hi guys,



I thought I was winning this game by a lot but in the end I barly won by 2.5 points...
I'm black .
Any ideas what went wrong ?

Cheers,
Otenki

Author:  ez4u [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I was leading with a lot or not?

First of all realize that if White had connected at G6 instead of effectively passing at 244, White would have been 2 points better off. If play continued as in the game, but White did not give Black a free point by throwing in at M7 as a ko "threat" in a half point ko (face palm!), White would have won by half a point. So one of the main things that went wrong was Black's assessment of the position. Far from being well ahead, he was probably behind. :)

In general, however, Black failed to make make territory from the stones played. An excellent example was the invasion of Black 47. What did Black want to achieve here? Before the invasion there is a weak White group at the top and a wide White extension along the right. As a result of the invasion, White's weak group at the top links up to a new White wall in the center, making it safe. Meanwhile Black's new wall in the center accomplishes... not much. Black never finds a way to play against White's position in the lower right. It is too strong to kill. So Black's original invasion was suspect. Black's invasion stone and White's lone stone were both weak. In fact though, the White stone had somewhere to run to and in the process helped White a lot. Meanwhile, for all the sound and fury, Black really did not have a use for the invader once White's right side and top stones linked up.

Black has to learn to play more strategically and think more about where the territory is going to finally come from. It is not enough to continuously chase each other around the board. Although attacking is a huge part of Go, in the end it is a game of territory.

Author:  Kirby [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I was leading with a lot or not?

ez4u wrote:
In general, however, Black failed to make make territory from the stones played. An excellent example was the invasion of Black 47. What did Black want to achieve here? Before the invasion there is a weak White group at the top and a wide White extension along the right. As a result of the invasion, White's weak group at the top links up to a new White wall in the center, making it safe. Meanwhile Black's new wall in the center accomplishes... not much.


I mostly agree - white's weak group becomes strong, so that's not ideal.

However, maybe I have a misunderstanding, too. Like you mentioned, Go is a game of territory. While the wall does not accomplish much in gaining territory, it does accomplish something in that it prevents white from making as much territory on the right, doesn't it?

In this example, since white's weak group becomes stronger, maybe it doesn't make sense to invade - if you attack the group, maybe it'll be easier to invade later.

But in general, making territory is one way to achieve superiority in this game of territory, but preventing the opponent is another way, I would think.

Or is this line of thinking too single-purposed?

Author:  Bill Spight [ Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I was leading with a lot or not?

I think that you had the lead for much of the game, but you almost frittered it away. Here is a place where you lost a few points.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc White 154
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O . X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . . O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . . . . . . O O . |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O . . O O O X . |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X . X X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . W a . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White 154 was the descent, :wc:. To which you replied at "a".

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Correct reply
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O . X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . . O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . . . . . . O O . |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O . . O O O X . |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X . X X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . W . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b1: is correct. Now Black has 9 pts. in the corner. You ended up with 5.

Later.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Moves 165 to 172
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 7 6 8 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Black 165 ( :b1: ) is an overplay.

Author:  ez4u [ Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I was leading with a lot or not?

Bill Spight wrote:
I think that you had the lead for much of the game, but you almost frittered it away. Here is a place where you lost a few points.

...

Later.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Moves 165 to 172
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 7 6 8 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Black 165 ( :b1: ) is an overplay.


Interesting position! Can White come up with something?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 8 6 7 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O 9 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . 3 . 4 . 6 7 . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 5 1 2 0 O X 8 . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . X O X 9 . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O X O O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Author:  Bill Spight [ Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I was leading with a lot or not?

Very nice, Dave! Thanks. :D

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/