Hi Joaz Banbeck, thanks for the review!
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
9: Your hoshi stone is afflicted with a double high approach. You could get locked in the corner.
The theoretically ideal play - if O17 were not there - would be to split him with P15.
I hadn't heard of the double high approach. I will keep in mind to prevent it in the future
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Your play is generally in the right direction, but lacks tactical punch.
Thanks, and I am not surprised

Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Since O17 is there, P16 may be best. It keeps your stones connected, makes territory, and prepares attacks on both of his. He can play P15 himself, but now you can cut him apart if he does.
Interesting. I like this much better
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
13: You have contact moves in three different locations. The first player to make a hane in such a situaion gets a big advantage. N16 is probably best, although R14 or P14 or R11 are strong too.
See
https://senseis.xmp.net/?WrapAroundTheContactPlayI hadn't even thought to follow up my own attachments with a hane later on
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
19: I agree with BlindGroup on this: O15 is the standard tesuji in such a position, and when used here it connects all of your stones by ensuring the death of his.
See
https://senseis.xmp.net/?BellyAttachmentI will do that. I feel like I should just crawl into Sensei's Library and not come out for a long while.

Joaz Banbeck wrote:
And if you must tenuki from the upper right, plays like R4 or F3 or C14 or C10 look better.
I like those variations
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
23: Step back a bit, look at the whole board. You have all of your stones on one half of the board.
Unless they are participants in a major fight, this is no good for you.
Agreed, and with

at K3 I began following him around for a bit so it seems like I waited just a bit too long to get my stones onto the other side
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
27: Split him with L4. This is elementary go strategy.
I'm trying to look for the large moves and think globally, but I'm not yet a good judge of which groups can be left alone for a move and which can't
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
31: Good! You extended from a crosscut.
Thanks!
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
39: H6 would be a hane at the head of two stones. It is a crushing move. But D6 is not bad.
Yes, I definitely missed that one, and with it some of that 'tactical punch' you mentioned earlier
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
43: Try to connect your stones with F6. ( Remember, go is sometimes referred to as 'The Surrounding Game" )
Will do
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
55: Were they going someplace? You already trapped them. You are ahead in liberties. You do not have to follow up here.
Better is Q4 or Q5. ( Q4 is tolerable because you have Q7 )
Ha, no they were not. I must admit that the beginner's bloodthirst clouded my judgement here.
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
57: Good! You are playing a hane against a contact move.
( The other hane might be better, but that is a minor quibble at this level )
My thinking with haneing on this side was to split his stones and force him into my stones above
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
59: The lower right is not settled. One move there could be the difference between life and death.
I'll grant you that it is a good extension from your left side strength, but the lower right is still urgent.
Clearly I need to work on when to look for large global moves vs. finish playing locally
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
61: This is the right area. Q5 would be better.
Duly noted
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
1) You could become a lot stronger if you adopt the fundamental idea of connect your groups and separate his. This is a really basic idea in go.
Thank you. I will spend some quality time with this strategy
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
2) On a one-on-one contact move, try to be the first one to hane.
Also duly noted
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
3) You are tenukiing a lot - which is a good policy for you. Too many players of your strength get stuck in the habit of following the other player around.
But you can get the greatest profit from this if you put a bit more thought into what is going to happen when you do tenuki. Is the position stable? Or can one more move by either side tip the scales dramatically?
Try to fine tune your tenuki judgement.
Yes, definitely. If nothing else your review has illustrated that I'm going too far out on the tenuki limb too often, and a stronger opponent is going to make me pay for it
Thanks again,
sleepy