Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
A game without fights http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6497 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | lemmata [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:12 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | A game without fights | ||
I had an opportunity to play an even game against a stronger player online. It was a quick (10m + 3x30s) and unrated game, so my opponent probably didn't play up to his true strength. Nevertheless, such games are good learning opportunities, so I am posting it here hoping to get some reviews from stronger players. Thanks in advance! ![]() I thought the game was pretty even for a long time. I thought that I was behind when white played 88. I was probably behind before that, but I can't quite pinpoint the moment I started falling behind.
|
Author: | Magicwand [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
black was ahead and started to lose from 51. almost all moves after 51 seems timid or wrong direction. |
Author: | Eizero [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
since I can't figure out how to post sgf files. I'll just comment here. Move 14 - looks like the wrong move by white. Move 24 - seems wrong by white again. Move 46- The lower left joseki is obviously unfavorable for white . He had c8 already, so he should have played different to get sente. Move 49 - doesn't seem necessary. Move 51- This is definitely not necessary now. You lost a move here, this is where white starts catching up. Instead of this move you could have played the move white played at 52. Move 57 - This move seems too loose. After white invades I can't see any good responses for black. Move 65 - your peep move seems aji keshi. see below Move 73 - this diagonal move seems really small, a jump to the center like k11 seems bigger. |
Author: | Shaddy [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
I agree entirely with magicwand (I had the same thought and then read his post) |
Author: | lemmata [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
Thanks for the comments! Eizero wrote: Move 49 - doesn't seem necessary. I missed these in the game. One of my bigger weaknesses is playing slow/unnecessary moves. Should I have played on the bottom side instead? Or is it bigger to protect that gap on the top side?Move 51- This is definitely not necessary now. You lost a move here, this is where white starts catching up. Instead of this move you could have played the move white played at 52. Eizero wrote: Move 57 - This move seems too loose. After white invades I can't see any good responses for black. What would be a good move instead and what do you think my most important in-game goal should be at that point?Eizero wrote: Move 65 - your peep move seems aji keshi. see below I always forget about this descent...
|
Author: | Eizero [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
at Move 51 you definitely should have went l6 it looks huge. For move 57? I'm not sure actually. maybe this? In bottom left his shape is defective. edit: Maybe 3 for black instead of 1 is better. black plays 3 first, then white goes 5 and then play the point to the right of 1. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
Maybe your opponent let you beat yourself. ![]() Edited goof. ![]() |
Author: | lemmata [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A game without fights |
Bill Spight wrote: ... Wow, thanks a lot. I really appreciated the details. I'll learn quite a bit from this. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |