It's about time I did another one of these. I've decided I want to learn to remember my games, so this time I made a new SGF and recreated it from memory instead of just downloading from KGS...

F6 still feels like a good idea, but I cant really find any good way to follow up on it so perhaps that was the mistake and D10 or something would have been better?

Don't! Not in order to post for comment anyway. The KGS file contains the timing info, which your 'from memory' file does not. It is very important to look at how you spend your time. There is a huge difference between choosing the wrong move after thinking about two candidates and playing a bad move without ever considering anything else. So do your memory work, but don't post that file.

I'm not sure that F6 was a good idea. Just on basic opening principles, you want to fight over the 3rd and 4th line, and the corner, where you can surround territory in two directions. The 6-6 point is relatively high and would need to be part of a special strategy. Is the strategy to build up the left side? But you've already finished off your upper left position with 3rd line stones (4th line to develop, 3rd line to complete). So to add some height to your position you decide to tenuki the LL to add a stone to the UL... W30&32 seem like a very aji keshi idea to me, but W ends up with three more stones than you locally (W's corner, B29 tenuki, W takes gote), so why wouldn't the LL favor W? The question is whether E14 and L5 compensate for the size of the corner, and whether stones like F6 and C7 are working efficiently.

D10 seems better than F6, but the basic idea of using C14 as the anchor for a large side doesn't seem quite right. W26 doesn't provide much corner protection, so jumping in seems like one idea. But if you aren't satisfied with the idea of making a small, stable group on the lower left side, maybe C6 is the wrong idea - why not approach from the opposite direction and make a sturdy little group on the lower side?