SoDesuNe wrote:
quantumf wrote:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . 3 . . 2 8 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 7 . 9 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Playing

here is "wrong" move order. You first hane above

.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . X . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . W X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Although this has been played - that's right - in a Korean game : D
The timing of the original

below is suspect. However, the story is a little more complicated. Pushing up at

at this point appears in over 300 games in GoGoD. So the problem is not obvious.

first appears in GoGoD played by Japanese amateurs at the beginning of the '70's. Kim In then came up with

as a reply. This variation was played a few times over the years in Korea but without clear success for Black. As a result, the connection at

as a reply to

has not appeared since 1990.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . X . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |[/go]
The more thematic issue is the reply of

to

below (the "normal" choice of

). Note that White can not continue with a play at 4 because

has taken away a liberty, making the cut at 'e' more threatening. So White goes back and connects at

. Play normally proceeds up to

. Black has gained in the upper right corner while

fixes White's cutting point and does a better job of undercutting the top. So why doesn't Black do this all the time? One point is that in the future White looks for the opportunity to descend at 'a' which Black can't resist too strongly because of the weakness in the shape here. So this variation is rare in the main line. However, if White first exchanges 'b' for 'c' before playing

, it is much easier for Black to descend at

because the marked White stone has been significantly weakened by the addition of a Black stone at 'c'. All that said, however, in most modern games in GoGoD Black just goes ahead and connects at 'd' anyway without attempting anything tricky. Black seems satisfied with reverting to the normal order of events.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . 1 4 . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . X . e O O X 2 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . d . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . b X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c W a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |[/go]
_________________
Dave Sigaty"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21