What does that mean to you in the context of a go game? What makes a game of go formal, informal, or casual?SmoothOper wrote:So whats the difference between casual and informal? I'm fine with an informal game of go.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/informal
It seems the dictionary makes a distinction: "suitable to or characteristic of casual and familiar, but educated, speech or writing."
",but educated "
A Casual Trend in Games
-
skydyr
- Oza
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: skydyr
- Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
- Location: DC
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
-
Polama
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:47 pm
- Rank: DGS 2 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Polama
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 148 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
My understanding is that casual and informal both mean a range of things, and that there's a nexus where they mean the same thing, basically: without prescribed regulation or ceremony. A formal dinner has rules about dress and etiquette and using your forks in the right order. An informal dinner or a casual dinner mean basically the same thing: don't worry about that stuff.SmoothOper wrote:So whats the difference between casual and informal? I'm fine with an informal game of go.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/informal
It seems the dictionary makes a distinction: "suitable to or characteristic of casual and familiar, but educated, speech or writing."
",but educated "
In this context, informal seems more focused on the lack of a larger structure to the games, or say, a pre-agreed upon super-ko rule. Casual seems more focused on the lack of ceremony: Maybe played without clocks, with new matches being struck up at random after the previous one ended, and results remembered but not recorded.
You can of course also describe a game as casual to mean the players weren't really trying.
So a casual club could be that they don't try hard, or it could be that there's no ceremony and little structure. So it might be different than informal or synonymous. I tend to interpret casual in this context to mean informal, but it's not the only possible reading.
-
SmoothOper
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:38 am
- Rank: IGS 5kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: KoDream
- IGS: SmoothOper
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
I don't think casual denotes a lack of structure, but simply denotes lack of stated structure, which is another annoying aspect of casualness, though some people prefer the cliquishness, gold chains, petty politics and such.Polama wrote:My understanding is that casual and informal both mean a range of things, and that there's a nexus where they mean the same thing, basically: without prescribed regulation or ceremony. A formal dinner has rules about dress and etiquette and using your forks in the right order. An informal dinner or a casual dinner mean basically the same thing: don't worry about that stuff.SmoothOper wrote:So whats the difference between casual and informal? I'm fine with an informal game of go.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/informal
It seems the dictionary makes a distinction: "suitable to or characteristic of casual and familiar, but educated, speech or writing."
",but educated "
In this context, informal seems more focused on the lack of a larger structure to the games, or say, a pre-agreed upon super-ko rule. Casual seems more focused on the lack of ceremony: Maybe played without clocks, with new matches being struck up at random after the previous one ended, and results remembered but not recorded.
You can of course also describe a game as casual to mean the players weren't really trying.
So a casual club could be that they don't try hard, or it could be that there's no ceremony and little structure. So it might be different than informal or synonymous. I tend to interpret casual in this context to mean informal, but it's not the only possible reading.
- Bantari
- Gosei
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:34 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Bantari
- Location: Ponte Vedra
- Has thanked: 642 times
- Been thanked: 490 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
That.Polama wrote:I think in this context "casual" is being used as the antonym to "formal", not "serious".SmoothOper wrote:I don't think it is the word casual that I have a problem with as much as the antonym being "Serious". Do you seriously think people who like to study, are taking the game seriously?
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!
- Bantari
- Gosei
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:34 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Bantari
- Location: Ponte Vedra
- Has thanked: 642 times
- Been thanked: 490 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
I still think that its a matter of a word, nothing more.SmoothOper wrote:So whats the difference between casual and informal? I'm fine with an informal game of go.
People say baduk or go, why?
People say goban or go board, why?
People say kifu or game record, why?
And does it matter?
For whatever reason the informal games are called "casual" games.
Do you really think it is worth to make a fuss over that?
If you can show that the word has some negative effects on something, acquisition of beginners for example, then you might have a point. Otherwise, it is just some little thing that everybody is ok with but for some reason it bugs you personally. I'd say - get over it, it is really not very important.
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!
-
SmoothOper
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:38 am
- Rank: IGS 5kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: KoDream
- IGS: SmoothOper
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
Well, I just think that people playing online seem to prefer(if not preferring, at least being accustomed to) a less casual style of play, why wouldn't that also be the case in person.Bantari wrote:I still think that its a matter of a word, nothing more.SmoothOper wrote:So whats the difference between casual and informal? I'm fine with an informal game of go.
People say baduk or go, why?
People say goban or go board, why?
People say kifu or game record, why?
And does it matter?
For whatever reason the informal games are called "casual" games.
Do you really think it is worth to make a fuss over that?
If you can show that the word has some negative effects on something, acquisition of beginners for example, then you might have a point. Otherwise, it is just some little thing that everybody is ok with but for some reason it bugs you personally. I'd say - get over it, it is really not very important.
- Monadology
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:26 pm
- Rank: KGS 7 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Krill
- OGS: Krill
- Location: Riverside CA
- Has thanked: 246 times
- Been thanked: 79 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
Bantari's point was that you can't just infer from the use of the word any particular or significant consequence. So unless you've played most of these people and thus have empirical evidence that they prefer a "more casual style of play" (whatever that is), it's bizarre that you're getting worked up about it.SmoothOper wrote:
Well, I just think that people playing online seem to prefer(if not preferring, at least being accustomed to) a less casual style of play, why wouldn't that also be the case in person.
-
SmoothOper
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:38 am
- Rank: IGS 5kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: KoDream
- IGS: SmoothOper
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
I'm starting to think casualness is bigger problem than just games...Monadology wrote:Bantari's point was that you can't just infer from the use of the word any particular or significant consequence. So unless you've played most of these people and thus have empirical evidence that they prefer a "more casual style of play" (whatever that is), it's bizarre that you're getting worked up about it.SmoothOper wrote:
Well, I just think that people playing online seem to prefer(if not preferring, at least being accustomed to) a less casual style of play, why wouldn't that also be the case in person.
-
skydyr
- Oza
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: skydyr
- Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
- Location: DC
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: A Casual Trend in Games
Like casual thinking?SmoothOper wrote:I'm starting to think casualness is bigger problem than just games...Monadology wrote:Bantari's point was that you can't just infer from the use of the word any particular or significant consequence. So unless you've played most of these people and thus have empirical evidence that they prefer a "more casual style of play" (whatever that is), it's bizarre that you're getting worked up about it.SmoothOper wrote:
Well, I just think that people playing online seem to prefer(if not preferring, at least being accustomed to) a less casual style of play, why wouldn't that also be the case in person.