It is currently Sun May 25, 2025 11:42 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #1 Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 8:07 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 415
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
Liked others: 43
Was liked: 32
Rank: EGF 2k
Universal go server handle: tygempanda
Hi guys,



I thought I was winning this game by a lot but in the end I barly won by 2.5 points...
I'm black .
Any ideas what went wrong ?

Cheers,
Otenki

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #2 Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:22 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2351
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
First of all realize that if White had connected at G6 instead of effectively passing at 244, White would have been 2 points better off. If play continued as in the game, but White did not give Black a free point by throwing in at M7 as a ko "threat" in a half point ko (face palm!), White would have won by half a point. So one of the main things that went wrong was Black's assessment of the position. Far from being well ahead, he was probably behind. :)

In general, however, Black failed to make make territory from the stones played. An excellent example was the invasion of Black 47. What did Black want to achieve here? Before the invasion there is a weak White group at the top and a wide White extension along the right. As a result of the invasion, White's weak group at the top links up to a new White wall in the center, making it safe. Meanwhile Black's new wall in the center accomplishes... not much. Black never finds a way to play against White's position in the lower right. It is too strong to kill. So Black's original invasion was suspect. Black's invasion stone and White's lone stone were both weak. In fact though, the White stone had somewhere to run to and in the process helped White a lot. Meanwhile, for all the sound and fury, Black really did not have a use for the invader once White's right side and top stones linked up.

Black has to learn to play more strategically and think more about where the territory is going to finally come from. It is not enough to continuously chase each other around the board. Although attacking is a huge part of Go, in the end it is a game of territory.

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21


This post by ez4u was liked by 3 people: Bill Spight, gowan, otenki
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #3 Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 8:48 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
ez4u wrote:
In general, however, Black failed to make make territory from the stones played. An excellent example was the invasion of Black 47. What did Black want to achieve here? Before the invasion there is a weak White group at the top and a wide White extension along the right. As a result of the invasion, White's weak group at the top links up to a new White wall in the center, making it safe. Meanwhile Black's new wall in the center accomplishes... not much.


I mostly agree - white's weak group becomes strong, so that's not ideal.

However, maybe I have a misunderstanding, too. Like you mentioned, Go is a game of territory. While the wall does not accomplish much in gaining territory, it does accomplish something in that it prevents white from making as much territory on the right, doesn't it?

In this example, since white's weak group becomes stronger, maybe it doesn't make sense to invade - if you attack the group, maybe it'll be easier to invade later.

But in general, making territory is one way to achieve superiority in this game of territory, but preventing the opponent is another way, I would think.

Or is this line of thinking too single-purposed?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #4 Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:38 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
I think that you had the lead for much of the game, but you almost frittered it away. Here is a place where you lost a few points.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc White 154
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O . X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . . O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . . . . . . O O . |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O . . O O O X . |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X . X X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . W a . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White 154 was the descent, :wc:. To which you replied at "a".

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Correct reply
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O . X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . . O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . . . . . . O O . |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O . . O O O X . |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X . X X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . W . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b1: is correct. Now Black has 9 pts. in the corner. You ended up with 5.

Later.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Moves 165 to 172
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 7 6 8 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Black 165 ( :b1: ) is an overplay.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #5 Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:31 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2351
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
Bill Spight wrote:
I think that you had the lead for much of the game, but you almost frittered it away. Here is a place where you lost a few points.

...

Later.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Moves 165 to 172
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 7 6 8 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Black 165 ( :b1: ) is an overplay.


Interesting position! Can White come up with something?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 8 6 7 . O X . . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O 9 5 4 1 . . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O 3 2 O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X X . . |
$$ | . . O . . . O . X O . . O . O X O . . |
$$ | O . O . O O . X . O . . O O X X . X . |
$$ | . O X X X X . . . , X X . . . , . . X |
$$ | X X X . . X . X X X . . O O . . X X O |
$$ | . O X O O . . . O O X X . . . . . O O |
$$ | . X . X . O . . O X O O O . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O X . . . O O O . . . |
$$ | X . . . X O . . . X X O O X O X X . . |
$$ | O X X , X . O O O O X X X X X , . X . |
$$ | O O X X . X X . . . X . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . O O X . X O O O . . X . . . O O . |
$$ | . O O . O X X X X O . 3 . 4 . 6 7 . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O X 5 1 2 0 O X 8 . |
$$ | . O O . . . . . . O . X O X 9 . O O O |
$$ | . X O O O O . . . , . O X O O O O X O |
$$ | . X X X . X X . X . . O X X O X X X X |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I was leading with a lot or not?
Post #6 Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:55 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Very nice, Dave! Thanks. :D

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group