Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:21 am

This is something I played recently. I was black, and I eventually won by 0,5 points. I was quite pleased with my play, but I'm sure there are plenty of mistakes waiting to be pointed out, so all comments are welcome.

EdLee · Post by **EdLee** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:10 am

216 moves in 10 minutes = less than 5.6 secs/move. A few quick ideas:

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:21 am

Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

lefuet · Post by **lefuet** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:31 am

tj86430 wrote:Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

your move dos not prevent D7 either.

EdLee · Post by **EdLee** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:37 am

tj86430 wrote:Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

You're welcome. Once W is out, your 2 B stones are no longer cutting stones (see note at :b99:

).
If your 2 B stones were important to you, you could've just connected at :b85:

.

emeraldemon · Post by **emeraldemon** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:16 am

A few thoughts:

:b39:

You might think about a move like J17 instead. The right side seems smaller than the top to me.

:b45:

I prefer approaching the lower left (C6), you have more support there. Maybe that's just style, though.

:b53:

I still prefer C6, or maybe F3 now. This slide is big, but can he afford to tennuki? A sequence like C6-K18-F3 seems better for black.

Why not :b75:

at A10? It seems to catch the stones without ko. Am I missing something?

:b129: H17 seems bigger.

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:27 am

lefuet wrote:
tj86430 wrote:Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

your move dos not prevent D7 either.

You are absolutely right. I totally misread it while playing, and didn't bother to read again afterwards.

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:29 am

EdLee wrote:
tj86430 wrote:Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?
You're welcome. Once W is out, your 2 B stones are no longer cutting stones (see note at ).

Thanks again. I saw the note, but I thought that at that point white was "more" out than at 89.

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:30 am

emeraldemon wrote:A few thoughts:

You might think about a move like J17 instead. The right side seems smaller than the top to me.

I prefer approaching the lower left (C6), you have more support there. Maybe that's just style, though.

I still prefer C6, or maybe F3 now. This slide is big, but can he afford to tennuki? A sequence like C6-K18-F3 seems better for black.

Why not at A10? It seems to catch the stones without ko. Am I missing something?

:b129: H17 seems bigger.

Thank you. As for B45, I thought I need to do something in the upper left before it develops to a big moyo.

tj86430 · Post by **tj86430** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:32 am

I'll respond to this, too:

EdLee wrote:216 moves in 10 minutes = less than 5.6 secs/move.

It's true that 10 mins games are awfully quick, but I seldom have time to play a long game, and I thought I rather post this than nothing.

Post by **Joaz Banbeck** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:44 pm

At move 17, P10 is probably necessary. But then he is ahead of you. So if you keep pushing, he gets more out of it then you do. Move 19 should be at N9.
Again, 21 should be at M9.

57 is not necessary. He can't cut: S16 and R15 are miai. You could play F4 or C6.

Life In 19x19

Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re:

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Re:

Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted