Page 9 of 12
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:25 pm
by Phelan
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:12 pm
by Marcus
approved
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:00 pm
by Phelan
Bump. It's Violence's turn, right?
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:24 pm
by jts
Phelan wrote: Bump. It's Violence's turn, right?
Yes.
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:58 am
by dangomango
seems like this game is going to break
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:02 pm
by jts
Well, Violence hasn't signed on in nearly a month. From his posts it seems like he occasionally gets busy times, work-wise.
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:19 pm
by Violence
My bad guys. Work is busier, and I had net problems, and I just plain forgot about this Malkovich(I've been thinking about Malkovich 1 much more often) I'll reply more frequently.
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:06 pm
by jts
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:53 pm
by jts
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Eh. This is a phase of the game that I have trouble with. I genuinely have trouble telling the difference between what's playable and what's unplayable, let alone what's great versus merely good, at junctures like this. This was my first instinct; further analysis suggests that we're weakening our group by playing this way. Yet further analysis reveals that it would be risky for W to seal us into the corner, since if our group lives between his two groups, he's got nothing.
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:05 pm
by Shaddy
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:54 pm
by Violence
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:14 pm
by dangomango
denied
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
c17 is definitely an option but it doesn't seem to gain much
but also seems to be aji keshi
i rather keep c17 an open option
I'm thinking this plan to get more territory while keeping whit e groups weak like below
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)and if we move elsewhere, white gets to play somewhere around o4 area
and a move like this not only strengthens whites weak groups but also try to build some type of moyo in the center and black will likely be sealed off
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-7(3) W-6(8)these are my major thoughts when i picked this L3 move
any thoughts especially from spectators are welcome
i think this is near the turning point of middle game which is why i made the change
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:51 pm
by Shaddy
Approved.
$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-6(10) W-6(8)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm20 Move 20... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-6(10) W-6(8)
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:13 am
by Phelan
$$Wcm22 Move 22... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-6(10) W-6(7)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm22 Move 22... P: B-0, W-0... C: B-6(10) W-6(7)
Re: Big Brother Malkovich #3
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:43 am
by Marcus
