<html> <head><title>301 Moved Permanently</title></head> <body bgcolor="white"> <center><h1>301 Moved Permanently</h1></center> <hr><center>nginx</center> </body> </html>
eu, i wanted to embed it in the post like SodesuNe did in his journal.
Re: New Super Meijin Tournament (interviews)
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:28 pm
by Harleqin
Magicwand wrote:White is in bad shape and needs to play one more move.
Could you provide some hint as to what Black threatens? My diagram is a somewhat unusual or archaic joseki, but it has been played several times not too long ago, for example, by Park Jung-Sang in 2005 (although it appears more often in older games). I have never seen the keima.
Re: New Super Meijin Tournament (interviews)
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:29 pm
by Magicwand
Harleqin wrote:
Magicwand wrote:White is in bad shape and needs to play one more move.
Could you provide some hint as to what Black threatens? My diagram is a somewhat unusual or archaic joseki, but it has been played several times not too long ago, for example, by Park Jung-Sang in 2005 (although it appears more often in older games). I have never seen the keima.
to all go players who whats to improve: whether you seen the keima shape or not i dont care. i am sure you can read why i am suggesting keima. i really dont care if the professionals played such move before. it leaves cutting point aji and i think white's shape is bad so i dont like it. why are people trying to copy professionals? many times they expriment with new shape and later conclude it to be suboptimal. if you can not feel the weakness with your own skin you will never imporve. have your own opinion and do not accept the joseki just because it is written. many times i experiment with new shapes and josekies before i accept the the fact the shape is bad or good. i am thinking that is one of the reason why i improved faster than others.
The only difference is that is now at 'a'. Can this difference mean that the white stones are now weaker?
Also, White has a stone on the left edge. I think White's must be fine in this diagram, and Black's shape feels more acceptable. The cut at "a" if White pushes feels very hairy to me.
The only difference is that is now at 'a'. Can this difference mean that the white stones are now weaker?
Also, White has a stone on the left edge. I think White's must be fine in this diagram, and Black's shape feels less vulnerable now. The cut at "a" if White pushes feels very hairy to me. However, I do much prefer Gu Li's variation
Re: New Super Meijin Tournament (interviews)
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:46 am
by palapiku
The most important thing for me is to be the strongest player in China. I am focused on improving my skill to achieve bigger successes. I believe that the best women seek successful men, and I have not yet achieved enough success.
So he admits that his goal with improving his Go skill is to get the best women. Refreshingly frank, though not surprising of course.
Re: New Super Meijin Tournament (interviews)
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:36 pm
by kokomi
palapiku wrote:
The most important thing for me is to be the strongest player in China. I am focused on improving my skill to achieve bigger successes. I believe that the best women seek successful men, and I have not yet achieved enough success.
So he admits that his goal with improving his Go skill is to get the best women. Refreshingly frank, though not surprising of course.
insightful interpretation
Re: New Super Meijin Tournament (interviews)
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:04 pm
by Bantari
Magicwand wrote:
Harleqin wrote:I think that cutting would have been fine, but the idea might have been that the far pincer would reduce the usefulness of Black's resulting strength (I have the impression that Gu Li's style is more on the grab-territory-then-shinogi side). However, for that I think that it would have been better to play this:
Strange... I distinctly remember the move in-game as a joseki. After that, if memory serves, Black should play somewhere around the White stone along the left... but now there is this White stone there, of course, so it seems good for White. Anybody can do their google magic and confirm that?
The 3 you suggest looks really weak... no need to play a 2nd line move like that in this position... yuck.
is now at 'a'. Can this difference mean that the white stones are now weaker?
insightful interpretation