Page 2 of 2
Re: Lee Sedol vs. Google DeepMind: Match 2
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 pm
by Uberdude
Yeah, I thought the 3-3 was good, and quite probably actually better than the iron pillar due to the reasons above.
Re: Lee Sedol vs. Google DeepMind: Match 2
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:43 pm
by Bonobo
From Facebook, re: move 37
- Face Washing Move.jpg (10.14 KiB) Viewed 15270 times
<edit>
OK, Lee left the room before it was played:
But imagine how strong a move must be if it does that to him even before it was played?!
</edit>
Re: Lee Sedol vs. Google DeepMind: Match 2
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 am
by seigenblues
3-3 isn't bad and it isn't great, it's totally normal. the idea was that he was too excited to play it, when really it's just a very ordinary move...
Re: Lee Sedol vs. Google DeepMind: Match 2
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:58 am
by Uberdude
In this translated article from Li Zhe 6p (the one studying philosophy at university) he said 3-3 was good, and better than the iron pillar (due to some reading that he didn't share):
https://massgoblog.wordpress.com/2016/0 ... -weakness/ (a bit over half way down under "HAS THE AI READ THROUGH?")