Re: Walls, extensions, and frameworks
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:54 pm
emeraldemon wrote:Not exactly the same, but I've been thinking about & researching extensions from and against the 3-4 enclosure.
With the 4-4 stone at least, the extension is where it is because if white invades at the 3-3, the resulting wall for black will be perfectly distanced from the extension. If white invades with an inside approach move, black can force white to overconcentrate (that is, the extension stone acts as a ready-made pincer). Further away and it wouldn't act as a pincer. eg:
Which means that on a huge board, I'll bet when you extend from a 4-4 stone, you don't chose the middle of a side, but chose the 7 point jump from the corner (the middle of a side is more like forming a vast moyo ie: something like niren-sei).
Not sure about the 3-4, but I bet it follows similar logic. It's not about forming the largest moyo possible (if it was, you'd approach the far corner it's facing). It's not about securing territory (if it was you'd make a tighter extension). It's about forming the largest area with a pre-existing pincer stone that will make white reluctant to invade, because he'll be concerned about becoming overconcentrated so early in the fuseki, or just helping black form secure territory. And if you expand to the other side and reinforce both wings, you've just about got a huge solid territory moyo that covers about an 8th of the board for the cost of only 6-7 stones.
does not become sente.
is an extension from the top right corner. It may also be considered an extension from the Black wall.
is too far away to be considered an extension from the wall (more than 5 spaces).
is still a good play. As always, no guarantee of correctness.