Pan Narrans, the Storytelling Chimp.hyperpape wrote:It's what we are--the human type of chimp.
I seem to recall there being a biologist or primatologist who referred to us as the third species of chimpanzee.
IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
- Phelan
- Gosei
- Posts: 1449
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:15 pm
- Rank: KGS 6k
- GD Posts: 892
- Has thanked: 1550 times
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
- Fedya
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:21 pm
- Rank: 6-7k KGS
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 139 times
Re:
Watson's relay presumably operates at whatever speed electrons in a current can move, which is relatively close to c. That would be much faster than human reflexes.EdLee wrote:How do you mean? I thought they built a mechanical buzzer for Watson so Watson had to buzz just like all the human contestants.fwiffo wrote:I wonder if he'd still win if they eliminated the buzzer as a factor.
The same buzzer rules applied to Watson, too.
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
Watson's mechanical solenoid finger has better reflexes than a human finger. That doesn't tell us anything about AI - just that we can build mechanical things that are better than humans at some tasks, which we already knew.
I'm suggesting that you could ask every clue in the format of Final Jeopardy, where all the players answered and the buzzer isn't a factor. That would be a more interesting test of its language understanding and answering ability.
I'm suggesting that you could ask every clue in the format of Final Jeopardy, where all the players answered and the buzzer isn't a factor. That would be a more interesting test of its language understanding and answering ability.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3374 times
Re: Re:
A built in delay of around 0.1 sec. seems reasonable to me.Fedya wrote:Watson's relay presumably operates at whatever speed electrons in a current can move, which is relatively close to c. That would be much faster than human reflexes.EdLee wrote:How do you mean? I thought they built a mechanical buzzer for Watson so Watson had to buzz just like all the human contestants.fwiffo wrote:I wonder if he'd still win if they eliminated the buzzer as a factor.
The same buzzer rules applied to Watson, too.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
hyperpape
- Tengen
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 65
- OGS: Hyperpape 4k
- Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
It would be nice to know how Watson would perform in a final jeopardy like format. But from the perspective of AI research, isn't the really important thing that Watson can answer Jeopardy questions on a level roughly comparable to (very very talented) humans? Winning is just icing on the cake.
P.S. Are any of Jennings, Watson or R.whatshisname? good enough that they could just buzz in on every question and end up with a positive score? I read speculation that Jennings was intentionally buzzing in before he'd confirmed that he knew the answer, just for the sake of beating Watson to the punch.
P.S. Are any of Jennings, Watson or R.whatshisname? good enough that they could just buzz in on every question and end up with a positive score? I read speculation that Jennings was intentionally buzzing in before he'd confirmed that he knew the answer, just for the sake of beating Watson to the punch.
- jts
- Oza
- Posts: 2672
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
- Rank: kgs 6k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 637 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
In buzzer competitions you usually want to buzz in before you know the answer. Then you figure it out while they call on you.hyperpape wrote:It would be nice to know how Watson would perform in a final jeopardy like format. But from the perspective of AI research, isn't the really important thing that Watson can answer Jeopardy questions on a level roughly comparable to (very very talented) humans? Winning is just icing on the cake.
P.S. Are any of Jennings, Watson or R.whatshisname? good enough that they could just buzz in on every question and end up with a positive score? I read speculation that Jennings was intentionally buzzing in before he'd confirmed that he knew the answer, just for the sake of beating Watson to the punch.
-
hyperpape
- Tengen
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 65
- OGS: Hyperpape 4k
- Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
That's true, but there's still some variable under the player's control here. There are questions where none of the players buzz in. They're obviously waiting for some information, at least in some categories (perhaps Jennings decides he's going to buzz in every time on the category "Biographical Facts Concerning Jennings").
-
ethanb
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:15 am
- Rank: AGA 2d
- GD Posts: 0
- IGS: ethanb
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test
IIRC if somebody buzzes in before the (human) person behind the switch decides the question has fairly been asked, they get a 3 second penalty before they can buzz in again. If they try again before the penalty is up, they get another second or two added. Maybe the man behind the curtain was a fraction slow activating the buzzers for a question and everybody's buzzer got locked down?hyperpape wrote:That's true, but there's still some variable under the player's control here. There are questions where none of the players buzz in. They're obviously waiting for some information, at least in some categories (perhaps Jennings decides he's going to buzz in every time on the category "Biographical Facts Concerning Jennings").
Actually, I think I remember reading that Watson has an unfair advantage there too; he senses the current when his buzzer is live.